<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org">
<title>Annals of Internal Medicine Articles</title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org</link>
<description>Annals of Internal Medicine RSS feed -- recent Articles articles</description>
<prism:publicationName>Annals of Internal Medicine</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0003-4819</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/9/593?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/9/602?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/9/612?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/8/517?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/8/528?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/8/538?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/7/437?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/7/447?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/7/456?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/6/369?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/6/379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/6/386?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.annals.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Annals of Internal Medicine</title>
<url>http://hwmaint.annals.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/9/593?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Community-Based Interventions to Promote Blood Pressure Control in a Developing Country: A Cluster Randomized Trial]]></title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/9/593?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Despite convincing evidence that lowering blood pressure decreases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, the hypertension burden remains high and control rates are poor in developing countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective:</st>
<p>To assess the effectiveness of 2 community-based interventions on blood pressure in hypertensive adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design:</st>
<p>Cluster randomized, 2&nbsp;<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>&nbsp;2 factorial, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00327574)</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting:</st>
<p>12 randomly selected communities in Karachi, Pakistan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients:</st>
<p>1341 patients 40 years or older with hypertension (systolic blood pressure &ge;140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure &ge;90 mm Hg, or already receiving treatment).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measurements:</st>
<p>Reduction in systolic blood pressure from baseline to end of follow-up at 2 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention:</st>
<p>Family-based home health education (HHE) from lay health workers every 3 months and annual training of general practitioners (GPs) in hypertension management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>The age, sex, and baseline blood pressure&ndash;adjusted decrease in systolic blood pressure was significantly greater in the HHE and GP group (10.8 mm Hg [95% CI, 8.9 to 12.8 mm Hg]) than in the GP-only, HHE-only, or no intervention groups (5.8 mm Hg [CI, 3.9 to 7.7 mm Hg] in each; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt; 0.001). The interaction between the main effects of GP training and HHE on the primary outcome approached significance (interaction <I>P</I>&nbsp;= 0.004 in intention-to-treat analysis and <I>P</I>&nbsp;= 0.044 in per-protocol analysis).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Limitations:</st>
<p>Follow-up blood pressure measurements were missing for 22% of patients. No mechanism was detected by which interventions lowered blood pressure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>Family-based HHE delivered by trained lay health workers, coupled with educating GPs on hypertension, can lead to significant blood pressure reductions among patients with hypertension in Pakistan. Both strategies in combination may be feasible for upscaling within the existing health care systems of Indo-Asian countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary Funding Source:</st>
<p>Wellcome Trust.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jafar, T. H., Hatcher, J., Poulter, N., Islam, M., Hashmi, S., Qadri, Z., Bux, R., Khan, A., Jafary, F. H., Hameed, A., Khan, A., Badruddin, S. H., Chaturvedi, N., for the Hypertension Research Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:06:36 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1059/0003-4819-151-9-200911030-00004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Community-Based Interventions to Promote Blood Pressure Control in a Developing Country: A Cluster Randomized Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>151</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>601</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>593</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/9/602?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Specialty Differences in Primary Care Physician Reports of Papanicolaou Test Screening Practices: A National Survey, 2006 to 2007]]></title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/9/602?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Cervical cancer screening guidelines were substantially revised in 2002 and 2003. Little information is available about primary care physicians' current Papanicolaou (Pap) test screening practices, including initiation, frequency, and stopping.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective:</st>
<p>To assess current Pap test screening practices in the United States.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design:</st>
<p>Cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting:</st>
<p>Nationally representative sample of physicians during 2006 to 2007.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants:</st>
<p>1212 primary care physicians.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measurements:</st>
<p>The survey included questions about physician and practice characteristics and recommendations for Pap screening presented as clinical vignettes describing women by age and by sexual and screening histories. A composite measure&mdash;guideline-consistent recommendations&mdash;was created by using responses to vignettes in which major guidelines were uniform.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Most physicians reported providing Pap tests to their eligible patients (91.0% [95% CI, 89.0% to 92.6%]). Among Pap test providers (<I>n</I>&nbsp;= 1114), screening practices, including number of tests ordered or performed, use of patient reminder systems, and cytology method used, varied by physician specialty (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt; 0.001). Although most Pap test providers reported that screening guidelines were very influential in their clinical practice, few had guideline-consistent recommendations for starting and stopping Pap screening across multiple vignettes (22.3% [CI, 19.9% to 25.0%]). Guideline-consistent recommendations varied by specialty (obstetrics/gynecology, 16.4%; internal medicine, 27.5%; and family or general practice, 21.1%). Compared with obstetricians/gynecologists, internal medicine specialists and family or general practice specialists were more likely to have guideline-consistent screening recommendations (odds ratio, 1.98 [CI, 1.22 to 3.23] and 1.45 [CI, 0.99 to 2.13], respectively) in multivariate analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Limitation:</st>
<p>Physician self-report may reflect idealized rather than actual practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>Primary care physicians' recommendations for Pap test screening are not consistent with screening guidelines, reflecting overuse of screening. Implementation of effective interventions that focus on potentially modifiable physician and practice factors is needed to improve screening practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary Funding Source:</st>
<p>National Cancer Institute, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yabroff, K. R., Saraiya, M., Meissner, H. I., Haggstrom, D. A., Wideroff, L., Yuan, G., Berkowitz, Z., Davis, W. W., Benard, V. B., Coughlin, S. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:06:36 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1059/0003-4819-151-9-200911030-00005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Specialty Differences in Primary Care Physician Reports of Papanicolaou Test Screening Practices: A National Survey, 2006 to 2007]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>151</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>611</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>602</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/9/612?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment of Very Early Rheumatoid Arthritis With Symptomatic Therapy, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs, or Biologic Agents: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis]]></title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/9/612?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Long-term control or remission of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be possible with very early treatment. However, no optimal first therapeutic strategy has been determined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective:</st>
<p>To assess the potential cost-effectiveness of major therapeutic strategies for very early RA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design:</st>
<p>Decision analytic model with probabilistic sensitivity analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data Sources:</st>
<p>Published data, the National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, and actual 2007 hospital costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Target Population:</st>
<p>U.S. adults with very early RA (symptom duration &le;3 months).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Time Horizon:</st>
<p>Lifetime.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Perspective:</st>
<p>Health care provider and societal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention:</st>
<p>3 management strategies were compared: a symptomatic or "pyramid" strategy with initial nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, patient education, pain management, and low-dose glucocorticoids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at 1 year for nonresponders; early DMARD therapy with methotrexate; and early therapy with biologics and methotrexate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome Measures:</st>
<p>Cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results of Base-Case Analysis:</st>
<p>By reducing the progression of joint erosions and subsequent functional disability, both early intervention strategies increase quality-adjusted life more than the pyramid strategy and save long-term costs. When the cost of very early intervention is factored in, the cost-effectiveness ratio of the early DMARD strategy is $4849 per QALY (95% CI, $0 to $16&nbsp;354 per QALY) compared with the pyramid strategy, whereas the benefits gained through the early biologic strategy come at a substantial incremental cost. The early DMARD strategy maximizes the effectiveness of early DMARDs and reserves the use of biologics for patients with more treatment-resistant disease of longer duration, for which the incremental benefit of biologics is greater.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results of Sensitivity Analysis:</st>
<p>The early biologic strategy becomes more cost-effective if drug prices are reduced, risk for death is permanently lowered through biologic therapy, patients experience drug-free remission, responders can be selected before therapy initiation, or effective alternative antirheumatic agents are available for patients for whom several biologics have failed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Limitations:</st>
<p>Data on the long-term effect of very early therapeutic interventions on the natural progression in disability and joint erosions are limited. The study considered only tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and not the newer biologics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>According to the most objective measures of RA progression, very early intervention with conventional DMARDs is cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness of very early intervention with biologics remains uncertain.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finckh, A., Bansback, N., Marra, C. A., Anis, A. H., Michaud, K., Lubin, S., White, M., Sizto, S., Liang, M. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:06:36 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1059/0003-4819-151-9-200911030-00006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment of Very Early Rheumatoid Arthritis With Symptomatic Therapy, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs, or Biologic Agents: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>151</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>621</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>612</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/8/517?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Fluticasone With and Without Salmeterol on Pulmonary Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Trial]]></title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/8/517?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background: </b> Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and long-acting &beta;<SUB>2</SUB>-agonists (LABAs) are used to treat moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p>
<p><b>Objective: </b> To determine whether long-term ICS therapy, with and without LABAs, reduces inflammation and improves pulmonary function in COPD.</p>
<p><b>Design: </b> Randomized, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00158847)</p>
<p><b>Setting: </b> 2 university medical centers in The Netherlands.</p>
<p><b>Patients: </b> 114 steroid-naive current or former smokers with moderate to severe COPD.</p>
<p><b>Measurements: </b> Cell counts in bronchial biopsies and sputum (primary outcome); methacholine responsiveness at baseline, 6, and 30 months; and clinical outcomes every 3 months.</p>
<p><b>Intervention: </b> Random assignment by minimization method to receive fluticasone propionate, 500 &micro;g twice daily, for 6 months (<I>n</I> = 31) or 30 months (<I>n</I> = 26); fluticasone, 500 &micro;g twice daily, and salmeterol, 50 &micro;g twice daily, for 30 months (single inhaler; <I>n</I> = 28); or placebo twice daily (<I>n</I> = 29).</p>
<p><b>Results: </b> 101 patients were greater than 70% adherent to therapy. Fluticasone therapy decreased counts of mucosal CD3<sup>+</sup> cells (&ndash;55% [95% CI, &ndash;74% to &ndash;22%]; <I>P</I> = 0.004), CD4<sup>+</sup> cells (&ndash;78% [CI, &ndash;88% to 60%]; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001), CD8<sup>+</sup> cells (&ndash;57% [CI, &ndash;77% to &ndash;18%]; <I>P</I> = 0.010), and mast cells (&ndash;38% [CI, &ndash;60% to &ndash;2%]; <I>P</I> = 0.039) and reduced hyperresponsiveness (<I>P</I> = 0.036) versus placebo at 6 months, with effects maintained after 30 months. Fluticasone therapy for 30 months reduced mast cell count and increased eosinophil count and percentage of intact epithelium, with accompanying reductions in sputum neutrophil, macrophage, and lymphocyte counts and improvements in FEV<SUB>1</SUB> decline, dyspnea, and quality of life. Reductions in inflammatory cells correlated with clinical improvements. Discontinuing fluticasone therapy at 6 months increased counts of CD3<sup>+</sup> cells (120% [CI, 24% to 289%]; <I>P</I> = 0.007), mast cells (218% [CI, 99% to 407%]; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001), and plasma cells (118% [CI, 9% to 336%]; <I>P</I> = 0.028) and worsened clinical outcome. Adding salmeterol improved FEV<SUB>1</SUB> level.</p>
<p><b>Limitations: </b> The study was not designed to evaluate clinical outcomes. Measurement of primary outcome was not available for 24% of patients at 30 months.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion: </b> ICS therapy decreases inflammation and can attenuate decline in lung function in steroid-naive patients with moderate to severe COPD. Adding LABAs does not enhance these effects.</p>
<p><b>Primary Funding Source: </b> Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, Netherlands Asthma Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline of The Netherlands, University Medical Center Groningen, and Leiden University Medical Center.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lapperre, T. S., Snoeck-Stroband, J. B., Gosman, M. M.E., Jansen, D. F., van Schadewijk, A., Thiadens, H. A., Vonk, J. M., Boezen, H. M., ten Hacken, N. H.T., Sont, J. K., Rabe, K. F., Kerstjens, H. A.M., Hiemstra, P. S., Timens, W., Postma, D. S., Sterk, P. J., the GLUCOLD (Groningen Leiden Universities Corticosteroids in Obstructive Lung Disease) Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:11:57 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Fluticasone With and Without Salmeterol on Pulmonary Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>151</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>527</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>517</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/8/528?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Collaborative Meta-analysis: Associations of 150 Candidate Genes With Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fracture]]></title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/8/528?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background: </b> Osteoporosis is a highly heritable trait. Many candidate genes have been proposed as being involved in regulating bone mineral density (BMD). Few of these findings have been replicated in independent studies.</p>
<p><b>Objective: </b> To assess the relationship between BMD and fracture and all common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in previously proposed osteoporosis candidate genes.</p>
<p><b>Design: </b> Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data.</p>
<p><b>Setting: </b> 5 international, multicenter, population-based studies.</p>
<p><b>Participants: </b> Data on BMD were obtained from 19&nbsp;195 participants (14&nbsp;277 women) from 5 populations of European origin. Data on fracture were obtained from a prospective cohort (<I>n</I> = 5974) from the Netherlands.</p>
<p><b>Measurements: </b> Systematic literature review using the Human Genome Epidemiology Navigator identified autosomal genes previously evaluated for association with osteoporosis. We explored the common SNPs arising from the haplotype map of the human genome (HapMap) across all these genes. BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Fractures were defined as clinically apparent, site-specific, validated nonvertebral and vertebral low-energy fractures.</p>
<p><b>Results: </b> 150 candidate genes were identified and 36&nbsp;016 SNPs in these loci were assessed. SNPs from 9 gene loci (<I>ESR1</I>, <I>LRP4</I>, <I>ITGA1</I>, <I>LRP5</I>, <I>SOST</I>, <I>SPP1</I>, <I>TNFRSF11A</I>, <I>TNFRSF11B</I>, and <I>TNFSF11</I>) were associated with BMD at either site. For most genes, no SNP was statistically significant. For statistically significant SNPs (<I>n</I> = 241), effect sizes ranged from 0.04 to 0.18 SD per allele. SNPs from the <I>LRP5</I>, <I>SOST</I>, <I>SPP1</I>, and <I>TNFRSF11A</I> loci were significantly associated with fracture risk; odds ratios ranged from 1.13 to 1.43 per allele. These effects on fracture were partially independent of BMD at <I>SPP1</I> and <I>SOST</I>.</p>
<p><b>Limitation: </b> Only common polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with SNPs in HapMap could be assessed, and previously reported associations for SNPs in some candidate genes could not be excluded.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion: </b> In this large-scale collaborative genome-wide meta-analysis, 9 of 150 candidate genes were associated with regulation of BMD, 4 of which also significantly affected risk for fracture. However, most candidate genes had no consistent association with BMD.</p>
<p><b>Primary Funding Source: </b> European Union, Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly, Netherlands Genomics Initiative, Wellcome Trust, National Institutes of Health, deCODE Genetics, and Canadian Institutes of Health Research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richards, J. B., Kavvoura, F. K., Rivadeneira, F., Styrkarsdottir, U., Estrada, K., Halldorsson, B. V., Hsu, Y.-H., Zillikens, M. C., Wilson, S. G., Mullin, B. H., Amin, N., Aulchenko, Y. S., Cupples, L. A., Deloukas, P., Demissie, S., Hofman, A., Kong, A., Karasik, D., van Meurs, J. B., Oostra, B. A., Pols, H. A.P., Sigurdsson, G., Thorsteinsdottir, U., Soranzo, N., Williams, F. M.K., Zhou, Y., Ralston, S. H., Thorleifsson, G., van Duijn, C. M., Kiel, D. P., Stefansson, K., Uitterlinden, A. G., Ioannidis, J. P.A., Spector, T. D., for the GEFOS (Genetic Factors for Osteoporosis) Consortium]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:11:57 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Collaborative Meta-analysis: Associations of 150 Candidate Genes With Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fracture]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>151</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>537</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>528</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/8/538?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Older Than 30 Years in the United States]]></title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/8/538?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background: </b> Women older than 30 years are the main beneficiaries of improved cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing. The role of vaccination against HPV types 16 and 18, which is recommended routinely for preadolescent girls, is unclear in this age group.</p>
<p><b>Objective: </b> To assess the health and economic outcomes of HPV vaccination in older U.S. women.</p>
<p><b>Design: </b> Cost-effectiveness analysis with an empirically calibrated model.</p>
<p><b>Data Sources: </b> Published literature.</p>
<p><b>Target Population: </b> U.S. women aged 35 to 45 years.</p>
<p><b>Time Horizon: </b> Lifetime.</p>
<p><b>Perspective: </b> Societal.</p>
<p><b>Intervention: </b> HPV vaccination added to screening strategies that differ by test (cytology or HPV DNA testing), frequency, and start age versus screening alone.</p>
<p><b>Outcome Measures: </b> Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (2006 U.S. dollars per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained).</p>
<p><b>Results of Base-Case Analysis: </b> In the context of annual or biennial screening, HPV vaccination of women aged 35 to 45 years ranged from $116&nbsp;950 to $272&nbsp;350 per QALY for cytology with HPV DNA testing for triage of equivocal results and from $193&nbsp;690 to $381&nbsp;590 per QALY for combined cytology and HPV DNA testing, depending on age and screening frequency.</p>
<p><b>Results of Sensitivity Analysis: </b> The probability of HPV vaccination being cost-effective for women aged 35 to 45 years was 0% with annual or biennial screening and less than 5% with triennial screening, at thresholds considered good value for money.</p>
<p><b>Limitation: </b> The natural history of the disease and the efficacy of the vaccine in older women are uncertain.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion: </b> Given currently available information, the effectiveness of HPV vaccination for women older than 30 years who are screened seems to be small. Compared with current screening that uses sensitive HPV DNA testing, HPV vaccination is associated with less attractive cost-effectiveness ratios in this population than those for other, well-accepted interventions in the United States.</p>
<p><b>Primary Funding Source: </b> National Cancer Institute, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the American Cancer Society.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, J. J., Ortendahl, J., Goldie, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:11:57 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Older Than 30 Years in the United States]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>151</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>545</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>538</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/7/437?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Facemasks and Hand Hygiene to Prevent Influenza Transmission in Households: A Cluster Randomized Trial]]></title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/7/437?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background: </b> Few data are available about the effectiveness of nonpharmaceutical interventions for preventing influenza virus transmission.</p>
<p><b>Objective: </b> To investigate whether hand hygiene and use of facemasks prevents household transmission of influenza.</p>
<p><b>Design: </b> Cluster randomized, controlled trial. Randomization was computer generated; allocation was concealed from treating physicians and clinics and implemented by study nurses at the time of the initial household visit. Participants and personnel administering the interventions were not blinded to group assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00425893)</p>
<p><b>Setting: </b> Households in Hong Kong.</p>
<p><b>Patients: </b> 407 people presenting to outpatient clinics with influenza-like illness who were positive for influenza A or B virus by rapid testing (index patients) and 794 household members (contacts) in 259 households.</p>
<p><b>Intervention: </b> Lifestyle education (control) (134 households), hand hygiene (136 households), or surgical facemasks plus hand hygiene (137 households) for all household members.</p>
<p><b>Measurements: </b> Influenza virus infection in contacts, as confirmed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or diagnosed clinically after 7 days.</p>
<p><b>Results: </b> Sixty (8%) contacts in the 259 households had RT-PCR&ndash;confirmed influenza virus infection in the 7 days after intervention. Hand hygiene with or without facemasks seemed to reduce influenza transmission, but the differences compared with the control group were not significant. In 154 households in which interventions were implemented within 36 hours of symptom onset in the index patient, transmission of RT-PCR&ndash;confirmed infection seemed reduced, an effect attributable to fewer infections among participants using facemasks plus hand hygiene (adjusted odds ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.87]). Adherence to interventions varied.</p>
<p><b>Limitation: </b> The delay from index patient symptom onset to intervention and variable adherence may have mitigated intervention effectiveness.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion: </b> Hand hygiene and facemasks seemed to prevent household transmission of influenza virus when implemented within 36 hours of index patient symptom onset. These findings suggest that nonpharmaceutical interventions are important for mitigation of pandemic and interpandemic influenza.</p>
<p><b>Primary Funding Source: </b> Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cowling, B. J., Chan, K.-H., Fang, V. J., Cheng, C. K.Y., Fung, R. O.P., Wai, W., Sin, J., Seto, W. H., Yung, R., Chu, D. W.S., Chiu, B. C.F., Lee, P. W.Y., Chiu, M. C., Lee, H. C., Uyeki, T. M., Houck, P. M., Peiris, J. S. M., Leung, G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:01:57 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Facemasks and Hand Hygiene to Prevent Influenza Transmission in Households: A Cluster Randomized Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>151</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>446</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>437</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/7/447?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of Alcohol and Sleep Restriction on Simulated Driving Performance in Untreated Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea]]></title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/7/447?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background: </b> Because of previous sleep disturbance and sleep hypoxia, patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) might be more vulnerable to the effects of alcohol and sleep restriction than healthy persons.</p>
<p><b>Objective: </b> To compare the effects of sleep restriction and alcohol on driving simulator performance in patients with OSA and age-matched control participants.</p>
<p><b>Design: </b> Driving simulator assessments in 2 groups under 3 different conditions presented in random order.</p>
<p><b>Setting: </b> Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Sleep Laboratory, Adelaide, Australia.</p>
<p><b>Participants: </b> 38 untreated patients with OSA and 20 control participants.</p>
<p><b>Measurements: </b> Steering deviation, crashes, and braking reaction time.</p>
<p><b>Intervention: </b> Unrestricted sleep, sleep restricted to a maximum of 4 hours, and ingestion of an amount of 40% vodka calculated to achieve a blood alcohol level of 0.05 g/dL.</p>
<p><b>Results: </b> Patients with OSA demonstrated increased steering deviation compared with control participants (mean, 50.5 cm [95% CI, 46.1 to 54.9 cm] in the OSA group and 38.4 cm [CI, 32.4 to 44.4 cm] in the control group; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt; 0.01) and significantly greater steering deterioration over time (group by time interaction, <I>P</I>&nbsp;= 0.02). The increase in steering deviation after sleep restriction and alcohol was approximately 40% greater in patients with OSA than in control participants (group by condition interaction, <I>P</I>&nbsp;= 0.04). Patients with OSA crashed more frequently than control participants (1 vs. 24 participants; odds ratio [OR], 25.4; <I>P</I>&nbsp;= 0.03) and crashed more frequently after sleep restriction (OR, 4.0; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt; 0.01) and alcohol consumption (OR, 2.3; <I>P</I>&nbsp;= 0.02) than after normal sleep. In patients with OSA, prolonged eye closure (&gt;2 seconds) and microsleeps (&gt; 2 seconds of theta activity on electroencephalography) were significant crash predictors (OR, 19.2 and 7.2, respectively; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt; 0.01). Braking reaction time was slower after sleep restriction than after normal sleep (mean, 1.39 [SD, 0.06] seconds vs. 1.22 [SD, 0.04] seconds; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt; 0.01) but not after alcohol consumption. No group differences were found.</p>
<p><b>Limitation: </b> Simulated driving was assessed rather than on-road driving.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion: </b> Patients with OSA are more vulnerable than healthy persons to the effects of alcohol consumption and sleep restriction on various driving performance variables.</p>
<p><b>Primary Funding Source: </b> Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vakulin, A., Baulk, S. D., Catcheside, P. G., Antic, N. A., van den Heuvel, C. J., Dorrian, J., McEvoy, R. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:01:57 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of Alcohol and Sleep Restriction on Simulated Driving Performance in Untreated Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>151</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>455</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>447</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/7/456?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations Between Structural Capabilities of Primary Care Practices and Performance on Selected Quality Measures]]></title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/7/456?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background: </b> Recent proposals to reform primary care have encouraged physician practices to adopt such structural capabilities as performance feedback and electronic health records. Whether practices with these capabilities have higher performance on measures of primary care quality is unknown.</p>
<p><b>Objective: </b> To measure associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on commonly used quality measures.</p>
<p><b>Design: </b> Cross-sectional analysis.</p>
<p><b>Setting: </b> Massachusetts.</p>
<p><b>Participants: </b> 412 primary care practices.</p>
<p><b>Measurements: </b> During 2007, 1 physician from each participating primary care practice (median size, 4 physicians) was surveyed about structural capabilities of the practice (responses representing 308 practices were obtained). Data on practice structural capabilities were linked to multipayer performance data on 13 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) process measures in 4 clinical areas: screening, diabetes, depression, and overuse.</p>
<p><b>Results: </b> Frequently used multifunctional electronic health records were associated with higher performance on 5 HEDIS measures (3 in screening and 2 in diabetes), with statistically significant differences in performance ranging from 3.1 to 7.6 percentage points. Frequent meetings to discuss quality were associated with higher performance on 3 measures of diabetes care (differences ranging from 2.3 to 3.1 percentage points). Physician awareness of patient experience ratings was associated with higher performance on screening for breast cancer and cervical cancer (1.9 and 2.2 percentage points, respectively). No other structural capabilities were associated with performance on more than 1 measure. No capabilities were associated with performance on depression care or overuse.</p>
<p><b>Limitation: </b> Structural capabilities of primary care practices were assessed by physician survey.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion: </b> Among the investigated structural capabilities of primary care practices, electronic health records were associated with higher performance across multiple HEDIS measures. Overall, the modest magnitude and limited number of associations between structural capabilities and clinical performance suggest the importance of continuing to measure the processes and outcomes of care for patients.</p>
<p><b>Primary Funding Source: </b> The Commonwealth Fund.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Friedberg, M. W., Coltin, K. L., Safran, D. G., Dresser, M., Zaslavsky, A. M., Schneider, E. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:01:57 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations Between Structural Capabilities of Primary Care Practices and Performance on Selected Quality Measures]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>151</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>463</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>456</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/6/369?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Case Management for Depression by Health Care Assistants in Small Primary Care Practices: A Cluster Randomized Trial]]></title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/6/369?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background: </b> Case management by health care assistants in small primary care practices provides unclear benefit for improving depression symptoms.</p>
<p><b>Objective: </b> To determine whether case management provided by health care assistants in small primary care practices is more effective than usual care in improving depression symptoms and process of care for patients with major depression.</p>
<p><b>Design: </b> Cluster randomized, controlled trial. A central automated system generated the randomization scheme, which was stratified by urban and rural practices; allocation sequence was concealed until groups were assigned.</p>
<p><b>Setting: </b> 74 small primary care practices in Germany from April 2005 to September 2007.</p>
<p><b>Patients: </b> 626 patients age 18 to 80 years with major depression.</p>
<p><b>Intervention: </b> Structured telephone interview to monitor depression symptoms and support for adherence to medication, with feedback to the family physician.</p>
<p><b>Measurements: </b> Depression symptoms at 12 months, as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); secondary outcomes were patient assessment of chronic illness care, adherence to medication, and quality of life.</p>
<p><b>Results: </b> A total of 310 patients were randomly assigned to case management and 316 to usual care. At 12 months, 249 intervention recipients and 278 control patients were assessed; 555 patients were included in a modified intention-to-treat-analysis (267 intervention recipients vs. 288 control patients). Compared with control patients, intervention recipients had lower mean PHQ-9 values in depression symptoms (&ndash;1.41 [95% CI, &ndash;2.49 to &ndash;0.33]; <I>P</I>&nbsp;= 0.014), more favorable assessments of care (3.41 vs. 3.11; <I>P</I>&nbsp;= 0.011), and increased treatment adherence (2.70 vs. 2.53; <I>P</I>&nbsp;= 0.042). Quality-of-life scores did not differ between groups.</p>
<p><b>Limitation: </b> Patients, health care assistants, family physicians, and researchers were not blinded to group assignment, and 12-month follow-up of patients was incomplete.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion: </b> Case management provided by primary care practice&ndash;based health care assistants may reduce depression symptoms and improve process of care for patients with major depression more than usual care.</p>
<p><b>Primary Funding Source: </b> German Ministry of Education and Research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gensichen, J., von Korff, M., Peitz, M., Muth, C., Beyer, M., Guthlin, C., Torge, M., Petersen, J. J., Rosemann, T., Konig, J., Gerlach, F. M., for PRoMPT (PRimary care Monitoring for depressive Patients Trial)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:36:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Case Management for Depression by Health Care Assistants in Small Primary Care Practices: A Cluster Randomized Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>151</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>378</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>369</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/6/379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ambulatory Care Among Young Adults in the United States]]></title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/6/379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background: </b> Young adults are the most likely age group to be uninsured and have the highest prevalence of substance abuse, motor vehicle accidents, and sexually transmitted diseases, yet little is known about their use of ambulatory care.</p>
<p><b>Objective: </b> To characterize ambulatory care of young adults.</p>
<p><b>Design: </b> Cross-sectional data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.</p>
<p><b>Setting: </b> Community and hospital-based clinics.</p>
<p><b>Patients: </b> Nonpregnant young adults age 20 to 29 years.</p>
<p><b>Measurements: </b> Ambulatory care utilization, types of visits, and preventive care.</p>
<p><b>Results: </b> Insured young adults had more visits (2.16 [95% CI, 2.14 to 2.19] annual visits per capita) than those without insurance (0.59 [CI, 0.54 to 0.67] annual visits per capita). Young men utilized ambulatory medical care less than adolescents age 15 to 19 years or older adults age 30 to 39 years (1.10, 1.65, and 1.73 annual visits per capita, respectively) and had lower rates of utilization than young women (1.10 vs. 2.31 annual visits per capita). Young black and Hispanic men had considerably fewer annual visits per capita (0.75 and 0.65, respectively) than did young white men (1.21). Young men had nearly one half the preventive care visits compared with male adolescents or older men (0.11, 0.24, and 0.19 annual visits per capita, respectively) and less than one quarter the visits compared with young women (0.11 vs. 0.48 annual visits per capita). Only 30.6% of visits by young adults included any preventive counseling, and few encounters included counseling directed toward injury prevention (2.4%), mental health (4.1%), or sexually transmitted diseases (2.7%).</p>
<p><b>Limitation: </b> School-based clinics were not included, and counseling may be underreported.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion: </b> Young adults use less ambulatory medical care relative to other groups and infrequently receive preventive care directed at the greatest threats to their health. Efforts to ensure appropriate preventive care are needed.</p>
<p><b>Primary Funding Source: </b> None.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fortuna, R. J., Robbins, B. W., Halterman, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:36:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ambulatory Care Among Young Adults in the United States]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>151</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>385</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/6/386?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Net Value of Health Care for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, 1997 to 2005]]></title>
<link>http://hwmaint.annals.org/cgi/content/short/151/6/386?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background: </b> The net economic value of increased health care spending remains unclear, especially for chronic diseases.</p>
<p><b>Objective: </b> To assess the net value of health care for patients with type 2 diabetes.</p>
<p><b>Design: </b> Economic analysis of observational cohort data.</p>
<p><b>Setting: </b> Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, a not-for-profit integrated health care delivery system.</p>
<p><b>Patients: </b> 613 patients with type 2 diabetes.</p>
<p><b>Measurements: </b> Changes in inflation-adjusted annual health care spending and in health status between 1997 and 2005 (with health status defined as 10-year cardiovascular risk), holding age and diabetes duration constant across the observation period ("modifiable risk"), and simulated outcomes for all diabetes complications based on the UKPDS (United Kingdom Perspective Diabetes Study) Outcomes Model. Net value was estimated as the present discounted monetary value of improved survival and avoided treatment spending for coronary heart disease minus the increase in annual spending per patient.</p>
<p><b>Results: </b> Assuming that 1 life-year is worth $200&nbsp;000 and accounting for changes in modifiable cardiovascular risk, the net value of changes in health care for patients with type 2 diabetes was $10&nbsp;911 per patient (95% CI, &ndash;$8480 to $33&nbsp;402) between 1997 and 2005, a positive dollar value that suggests the value of health care has improved despite increased spending. A second approach based on diabetes complications yielded a net value of $6931 per patient (CI, &ndash;$186&nbsp;901 to $211&nbsp;980).</p>
<p><b>Limitation: </b> The patient population was homogeneous and small, and the wide CIs of the estimates are compatible with a decrease as well as an increase in value.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion: </b> The economic value of improvements in health status for patients with type 2 diabetes seems to exceed or equal increases in health care spending, suggesting that those increases were worth the extra cost. However, the possibility that society is getting less value for its money could not be statistically excluded, and there is opportunity to improve the value of diabetes-related health care.</p>
<p><b>Primary Funding Source: </b> None.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eggleston, K. N., Shah, N. D., Smith, S. A., Wagie, A. E., Williams, A. R., Grossman, J. H., Berndt, E. R., Long, K. H., Banerjee, R., Newhouse, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:36:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Net Value of Health Care for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, 1997 to 2005]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>151</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>393</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>386</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>