Advertisement
Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 

Cover Image   
box In this Issue
  arrow Articles
  arrow Updates
  arrow Clinical Guidelines
  arrow Editorials
  arrow On Being a Doctor
  arrow Letters
  arrow Ad Libitum
  arrow Ancillary Content
  arrow Summaries for Patients
  arrow In the Clinic
  arrow PDF of Contents
box Services
  arrow Subscribe
  arrow One-time access
  arrow Activate online subscription
  arrow Access Personal Archive
 
box In this Issue
  arrow Articles
  arrow Updates
  arrow Clinical Guidelines
  arrow Editorials
  arrow On Being a Doctor
  arrow Letters
  arrow Ad Libitum
  arrow Ancillary Content
  arrow Summaries for Patients
  arrow In the Clinic
  arrow PDF of Contents
box Services
  arrow Subscribe
  arrow One-time access
  arrow Activate online subscription
  arrow Access Personal Archive
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2 October 2007 Volume 147 Issue 7
< Previous Issue  |  Next Issue >
Clear

Articles Back

Giovanni Parmigiani, Sining Chen, Edwin S. Iversen, Jr, Tara M. Friebel, Dianne M. Finkelstein, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, Barbara L. Weber, Andrea Eisen, Kathleen E. Malone, Janet R. Daling, Li Hsu, Elaine A. Ostrander, Leif E. Peterson, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Claudine Isaacs, Camille Corio, Leoni Leondaridis, Gail Tomlinson, Christopher I. Amos, Louise C. Strong, Donald A. Berry, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Sharon Sand, Debra Dutson, Rich Kerber, Beth N. Peshkin, and David M. Euhus

Because of the expense of testing for mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene, programs use models to estimate the probability of a mutation. Parmigiani and colleagues systematically compared the accuracy of 6 publicly available models in 3 population-based samples and 8 samples of high-risk women from genetic counseling clinics. For practical purposes, the 6 models all discriminated well between women with and without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. None of the models has good sensitivity and specificity across a range of validation populations and probability thresholds to refer for mutation testing.

Abstract | Full Text | PDF | Summary for Patients | Audio Summary

Domenico Alvaro, Gianpiero Macarri, Maria Grazia Mancino, Marco Marzioni, MariaConsiglia Bragazzi, Paolo Onori, Stefano Ginanni Corradini, Pietro Invernizzi, Antonio Franchitto, Adolfo F. Attili, Eugenio Gaudio, and Antonio Benedetti

The researchers measured insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the serum and biliary fluid of 73 patients referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, to assess whether these substances help diagnose extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Biliary IGF-I levels were 15- to 20-fold greater in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma than in patients with pancreatic cancer or benign biliary diseases, whereas the biliary VEGF concentration was similar in the 3 groups. Measurement of biliary IGF-I may help to differentiate patients with cholangiocarcinoma from those with pancreatic cancer or benign biliary disease.

Abstract | Full Text | PDF

David W. Hutton, Daniel Tan, Samuel K. So, and Margaret L. Brandeau

Up to 10% of Asians and Pacific Islanders living in the United States are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), and 25% of them will die of HBV-related illness unless treated. Two thirds are unaware of their HBV infection. The authors assessed the incremental cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for voluntary screening for HBV in Asian and Pacific Islander adults in the United States. Compared with voluntary screening only, 2 proactive screening strategies were cost-effective. The first was to screen everyone and then treat infected persons. The second was to screen everyone, treat infected persons, and ring vaccinate close contacts. Both strategies cost $36 000 to $40 000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.

Abstract | Full Text | PDF


Updates Back

David B. Reuben

This Update in Geriatric Medicine features 12 articles published in 2006. Topics include endocrinology, supplements for age-related disorders, urology, dementia, and preventive medicine.

Full Text | PDF


Clinical Guidelines Back

Roger Chou, Amir Qaseem, Vincenza Snow, Donald Casey, J. Thomas Cross, Jr, Paul Shekelle, Douglas K. Owens for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians and the American College of Physicians/American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines Panel*

Low back pain is the fifth most common reason for all physician visits in the United States. This guideline presents the available evidence for evaluation and management of acute and chronic low back pain in primary care settings. The target audience is all clinicians caring for patients with low (lumbar) back pain of any duration, with or without leg pain. The target patient population is adults with acute and chronic low back pain not associated with major trauma.

Abstract | Full Text | PDF | Summary for Patients | Audio Summary | Video News Release | CME

Roger Chou and Laurie Hoyt Huffman

This evidence review assesses the benefits and harms of diverse nonpharmacologic treatments for acute or chronic low back pain with or without leg pain. Therapies with good evidence of moderate efficacy for chronic or subacute low back pain are cognitive-behavioral therapy, exercise, spinal manipulation, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation. For acute low back pain, the only therapy with good evidence of efficacy is superficial heat.

Abstract | Full Text | PDF | Video News Release

Roger Chou and Laurie Hoyt Huffman

This evidence review assesses benefits and harms of pharmacologic therapies for acute or chronic low back pain with or without leg pain. Medications with good evidence of short-term effectiveness for low back pain are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain). Evidence is insufficient to identify one medication with a clear overall net advantage because of complex tradeoffs between benefits and harms.

Abstract | Full Text | PDF | Video News Release


Editorials Back

Susan M. Domchek and Antonis Antoniou

In this issue, Parmigiani and colleagues tested the ability of 6 models to discriminate BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers from noncarriers. According to these researchers, no one type of model is best. However, to avoid underestimating the risk for breast cancer, one must look at both the risk that an individual has a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and the risk that the individual will develop breast cancer. We need to develop better methods for collecting and acknowledging family history while we continue to improve risk models.

Full Text | PDF


On Being a Doctor Back

Thalia Margalit

Interview after interview, it is the same pastries, the same information session, the same suits, the same emergency room. Only instead of selling kitchen knives or used cars, I'm selling myself—not only my efficiency, my clinical and research experiences, and my board scores but also my deepest, most personal motivations.

Full Text | PDF


Letters Back

Management of Venous Thromboembolism

Intensive Intraoperative Insulin Therapy versus Conventional Glucose Management during Cardiac Surgery

    Gunjan Y. Gandhi, Gregory A. Nuttall, and Martin D. Abel—RESPONSE

    Full Text | PDF

Quantitative Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test for Diagnosing Colorectal Neoplasia

    Paul Rozen, Zohar Levi, and Yaron Niv—RESPONSE

    Full Text | PDF

Anticoagulant Prophylaxis for Hospitalized Medical Patients

    Frank A. Lederle, Roderick MacDonald, and Timothy J. Wilt

    Full Text | PDF

    Mark A. Crowther, Francesco Dentali, Wendy Lim, and James D. Douketis—RESPONSE

    Full Text | PDF

Correction: Counseling about Proper Use of Motor Vehicle Occupant Restraints and Avoidance of Alcohol Use while Driving



Ad Libitum Back

Joshua Latzman

Full Text | PDF


Ancillary Content Back

Full Text


Summaries for Patients Back

Full Text | PDF

Full Text | PDF | Video News Release


In the Clinic Back

This issue provides a clinical overview of influenza, focusing on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, practice improvement, and patient information. Readers can complete the accompanying CME quiz for 1.5 credits.

Description | PDF | PIER module



 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Physicians.