Prophylactic Cholecystectomy or Expectant Management for Silent Gallstones

A Decision Analysis to Assess Survival

  1. DAVID F. RANSOHOFF, M.D.;
  2. WILLIAM A. GRACIE, M.D.;
  3. LEWIS B. WOLFENSON, Ph.D.; and
  4. DUNCAN NEUHAUSER, Ph.D.
  1. Cleveland, Ohio; and Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Abstract

    Decision analysis was done to compare the consequences of prophylactic cholecystectomy with expectant management for silent gallstone disease. Probability values were derived from a study of the natural history of silent gallstone disease, published cholecystectomy mortality rates, and life tables. The two strategies were compared by calculating cumulative numbers of person-years lost for hypothetical cohorts of men and women. Prophylactic cholecystectomy slightly decreases survival. A 30-year-old man choosing prophylactic cholecystectomy instead of expectant management would lose, on average, 4 days of life; a 50-year-old man would lose 18 days. Consideration of monetary costs and discounting further disfavors prophylactic cholecystectomy. Sensitivity analysis shows that differences between the two strategies remain small over a broad range of probability values, both for men and women.

    Article and Author Information

    • ▸From the Departments of Medicine, Biometry, and Epidemiology and Community Health, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; and the Department of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    • ▸Requests for reprints should be addressed to David F. Ransohoff, M.D.; University Hospitals of Cleveland, 2074 Abington Road; Cleveland, OH 44106.

    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents