Evaluation of Plain Abdominal Radiographs in the Diagnosis of Abdominal Pain

  1. RONALD L. EISENBERG, M.D.;
  2. PAUL HEINEKEN, M.D.;
  3. MARCUS W. HEDGCOCK, M.D.;
  4. MICHAEL FEDERLE, M.D.; and
  5. HENRY I. GOLDBERG, M.D.
  1. San Francisco, California

    Abstract

    In an effort to develop referral criteria for the ordering of abdominal radiographs for patients presenting with abdominal symptoms, we prospectively studied the relation between clinical data and radiographic abnormalities. Of 1780 examinations, 179 (10.0%) showed some radiographic abnormality. If abdominal radiographs would have been limited to those patients who had moderate or severe abdominal tenderness, or to patients with a high clinical suspicion of bowel obstruction, renal or ureteral calculi, trauma, ischemia, or gallbladder disease, regardless of the degree of tenderness, 956 (53.7%) examinations would not have been done. All radiographic abnormalities reflecting a serious pathologic process would have been identified. Only 33 (3.5%) abnormalities of limited significance, almost all localized or generalized ileus, would have been undetected. The adoption of these referral criteria would result in minimal loss of clinically useful information, large financial savings, and a reduction in radiation exposure.

    Article and Author Information

    • ▸From the Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center, and the Departments of Radiology of the San Francisco General Hospital and University of California; San Francisco, California.

    • ▸Requests for reprints should be addressed to Ronald L. Eisenberg, M.D.; Department of Radiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 33932; Shreveport, LA 71130.

    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents