Clinical Decisions to Limit Treatment

  1. BERNARD LO, M.D.; and
  2. ALBERT R. JONSEN, Ph.D.
  1. San Francisco, California

    Abstract

    A case of a patient with gastrointestinal hemorrhage raises the question of limiting medical treatment. We analyze four reasons to limit treatment: Treatment is futile, the patient refuses treatment, the costs of treatment seem excessive, and the quality of life is judged unacceptable. For cases in which treatment is to be limited, we offer practical suggestions for compassionate and appropriate terminal care.

    Article and Author Information

    • ▸From the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholar Program, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, and the Bioethics Program and Health Policy Program, University of California, San Francisco; California.

    • Grant support: in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Commonwealth Foundation.

    • ▸Requests for reprints should be addressed to Bernard Lo, M.D.; Division of General Internal Medicine, Room A 405, 400 Parnassus Avenue, University of California Medical Center; San Francisco, CA 94143.

    | Table of Contents
    Most Read Most Read
    Most Commented Most Commented On
    Annals in the News Annals in the News
    Clinical Trials Clinical Trials
    Comparative Effectiveness Comparative Effectiveness
    Hospital Medicine Hospital Medicine
    • Advertisement
    • Advertisement