Use of a Computer to Detect and Respond to Clinical Events: Its Effect on Clinician Behavior

  1. CLEMENT J. McDONALD, MD.
  1. Indianapolis, Indiana

    Abstract

    A computer was used to prospectively detect and suggest responses to simple, medication-related events as reflected in a computerized record in a prospective, randomized study of a diabetes clinic with primary-care responsibility. There were two categories of event/suggestions: when the last observation of a test required for medication control was too old, the computer suggested a repeat; and when an abnormality with therapeutic implications was detected, the computer suggested a specific change in therapeutics. Clinicians responded to 36% of events in the first category with computer reminders and 11% without (P < 0.0001); they responded to 28% of events in the second category with computer assistance and 13% without (P < 0.026). For the most clinically significant of these second category events, the difference was even greater: 47% with and 4% without computer assistance (P < 0.0004). I believe that computer detection and response (in the form of reminders) to simple clinical events will change clinician behavior.

    Article and Author Information

    • ▸From the Departments of Community Hea'th Sciences and Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine; and the Regenstrief Institute for Health Care; Indianapolis, Indiana.

    • ▸Requests for reprints should be addressed to Clement J. McDonald, M.D., Regenstrief Institute, Wishard Memorial Hospital, 1001 W. 10th St., Indianapolis, IN 46202.

      • Received October 28, 1975.
      • Accepted November 13, 1975.
    | Table of Contents
    Most Read Most Read
    Most Commented Most Commented On
    Annals in the News Annals in the News
    Clinical Trials Clinical Trials
    Comparative Effectiveness Comparative Effectiveness
    Hospital Medicine Hospital Medicine
    • Advertisement
    • Advertisement