Viral Arthritis

  1. JAMES W. SMITH, M.D.; and
  2. JAY P. SANFORD, M.D., F.A.C.P.
  1. Requests for reprints should be addressed to James W. Smith, M.D., Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School,
    5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, Tex. 75235
    .

Excerpt

Various bacterial agents are considered in the differential diagnosis of acute arthritis, but little consideration is given to a viral etiology, although a variety of viral agents have been associated with clinical arthritis. Representation is limited to a small number of the major groups of viruses. The reported viral agents have been categorized as those in which arthritis is either a common or presenting clinical feature (Table 1) and those in which arthritis is a very uncommon feature (Table 2). This review emphasizes the need to consider these agents in the differential diagnosis of acute arthritis.

RUBELLA In an epidemic

This 100-word excerpt has been provided in the absence of an abstract.

Article and Author Information

  • From the Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Tex.

  • This work was supported in part by training grant T1-AI-30, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

  • At the time of this study Dr. Smith was the recipient of a Veterans Administration Clinical Investigatorship.

    • Received February 27, 1967.
    • Accepted March 10, 1967.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents