RSS Feeds
Computer-Assisted Screening for Intimate Partner Violence and Control
- Farah Ahmad, MBBS, MPH, PhD;
- Sheilah Hogg-Johnson, PhD;
- Donna E. Stewart, MD;
- Harvey A. Skinner, PhD, CPsych;
- Richard H. Glazier, MD, MPH; and
- Wendy Levinson, MD
- From the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Institute for Work & Health; Women's Health Program, University Health Network; York University; and Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
-
Appendix Figure. Example of a physician report printed by Promote Health. -
Figure 1. Coding scheme for the audiotaped physician–patient interactions.Shaded areas represent measured primary outcomes; after training, intercoder reliability was good for all measures (κ = 0.82 to 1.0).
* “Discussion opportunity” refers to whether the patient or physician raised the possibility of the patient being at risk for intimate partner violence or control.
-
Figure 2. Study flow diagram.IQR = interquartile range.
* Informed consent could not be completed because patients were called into visit (n = 40) or the research room was busy (n = 29).
† 1 patient left before the visit because the physician was behind schedule; 2 physicians canceled the visits because of personal emergency; and 1 physician assigned the visit to a resident.
‡ The physician withdrew because the participant had mental health issues.
§ The physician and patient conversed in a language not understood by the coders.
Related Clinical Content
