Interventions in Primary Care to Promote Breastfeeding: An Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

  1. Mei Chung, MPH;
  2. Gowri Raman, MD;
  3. Thomas Trikalinos, MD, PhD;
  4. Joseph Lau, MD; and
  5. Stanley Ip, MD
  1. From Tufts-New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Abstract

    Background: Evidence suggests that breastfeeding decreases the risk for many diseases in mothers and infants. It is therefore important to evaluate the effectiveness of breastfeeding interventions.

    Purpose: To systematically review evidence for the effectiveness of primary care–initiated interventions to promote breastfeeding with respect to breastfeeding and child and maternal health outcomes.

    Data Sources: Electronic searches of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL from September 2001 to February 2008 and references of selected articles, restricted to English-language publications.

    Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials of primary care–initiated interventions to promote breastfeeding, mainly in developed countries.

    Data Extraction: Characteristics of interventions and comparators, study setting, study design, population characteristics, the proportion of infants continuing breastfeeding by different durations, and infant or maternal health outcomes were recorded.

    Data Synthesis: Thirty-eight randomized, controlled trials (36 in developed countries) met eligibility criteria. In random-effects meta-analyses, breastfeeding promotion interventions in developed countries resulted in significantly increased rates of short- (1 to 3 months) and long-term (6 to 8 months) exclusive breastfeeding (rate ratios, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.11 to 1.48] and 1.44 [CI, 1.13 to 1.84], respectively). In subgroup analyses, combining pre- and postnatal breastfeeding interventions had a larger effect on increasing breastfeeding durations than either pre- or postnatal interventions alone. Furthermore, breastfeeding interventions with a component of lay support (such as peer support or peer counseling) were more effective than usual care in increasing the short-term breastfeeding rate.

    Limitations: Meta-analyses were limited by clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Reliable estimates for the isolated effects of each component of multicomponent interventions could not be obtained.

    Conclusion: Evidence suggests that breastfeeding interventions are more effective than usual care in increasing short- and long-term breastfeeding rates. Combined pre- and postnatal interventions and inclusion of lay support in a multicomponent intervention may be beneficial.

    Article and Author Information

    • Disclaimer: The authors of this manuscript are responsible for its content. Statements in the review should not be construed as endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    • Grant Support: From the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (contract no. 290-02-0022).

    • Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

    • Requests for Single Reprints: Mei Chung, MPH, Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Box 63, Boston, MA 02111; e-mail, mchung1{at}tuftsmedicalcenter.org.

    • Current Author Addresses: Ms. Chung and Drs. Raman, Trikalinos, Lau, and Ip: Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Box 63, Boston, MA 02111.

    Related Article

    | Table of Contents
    Most Read Most Read
    Most Commented Most Commented On
    Annals in the News Annals in the News
    Clinical Trials Clinical Trials
    Comparative Effectiveness Comparative Effectiveness
    Hospital Medicine Hospital Medicine
    • Advertisement
    • Advertisement