Systematic Review: Randomized, Controlled Trials of Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Women
- Tatyana A. Shamliyan, MD, MS;
- Robert L. Kane, MD;
- Jean Wyman, PhD; and
- Timothy J. Wilt, MD, MPH
- From the University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center, University of Minnesota School of Nursing, University of Minnesota Medical School, and Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
-
Figure 1. Study flow diagram.
PFMT = pelvic floor muscle training; UI = urinary incontinence. *Literature search was conducted to examine diagnosis of, prevalence of, incidence of, risk factors for, and clinical interventions for UI and fecal incontinence. †Some randomized, controlled trials examined several interventions.
-
Figure 3. Effects of duloxetine compared with placebo on resolving or improving urinary incontinence in community-dwelling women (risk difference from individual randomized, controlled trials).
CST = cough stress test; PFMT = pelvic floor muscle training; PGI-I = Patient Global Impression of Improvement; SPT = stress pad test.
-
Figure 4. Effects of different doses of duloxetine on resolving or improving urinary incontinence in community-dwelling women (risk difference from individual randomized, controlled trials).
CST = cough stress test; PFMT = pelvic floor muscle training; PGI-I = Patient Global Impression of Improvement; SPT = stress pad test.
RSS Feeds














