Systematic Review: The Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Procedural survival (top) and stroke risk (bottom).

The size of each box is proportional to the sample size of the trial. Bars represent 95% CIs. The I2 statistic was <1 for both procedural survival and procedural stroke risk. AMIST = Angioplasty versus Minimally Invasive Surgery Trial; ARTS = Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study; AWESOME = Angina with Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation; BARI = Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation; CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; CABRI = Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularization Investigation; EAST = Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial; ERACI = Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease; GABI = German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation; MASS = Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; RITA = Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina; SIMA = Stenting versus Internal Mammary Artery Study; SoS = Stent or Surgery. *Survival data were abstracted from Kaplan–Meier curves.

This Article

  1. Ann Intern Med November 20, 2007 vol. 147 no. 10 703-716