Colorectal Screening after Polypectomy: A National Survey Study of Primary Care Physicians

  1. Vikram Boolchand, MD;
  2. Gregory Olds, MD;
  3. Joseph Singh, MD;
  4. Pankaj Singh, MD;
  5. Amitabh Chak, MD; and
  6. Gregory S. Cooper, MD
  1. From University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; and Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, Texas.

    Abstract

    Background: Recommendations by primary care physicians for colorectal screening after polypectomy will influence rates of colonoscopy in open-access systems that do not require consultation by a gastroenterologist before colonoscopy.

    Objective: To determine the surveillance recommendations of primary care physicians after polypectomy and compare them with recommendations from the U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

    Design: Cross-sectional study of physicians.

    Setting: United States.

    Participants: A random sample of 500 physicians from the American College of Physicians and 500 physicians from the American Academy of Family Physicians, obtained by using a mail survey.

    Measurements: Physicians were asked when they would recommend repeated colonoscopy for a hypothetical 55-year-old man with no family history of colorectal cancer after the following 6 results on colonoscopy: hyperplastic polyp, one 6-mm tubular adenoma, two 6-mm tubular adenomas, one 12-mm tubulovillous adenoma, one 12-mm tubular adenoma with focal high-grade dysplasia, and no polyp but a previous tubular adenoma.

    Results: The overall response rate was 57% (568 physicians). Of the respondents, 48% were internists and 52% were family practitioners. Sixty-one percent of respondents would survey a hyperplastic polyp in 5 years or less, 71% would survey a single tubular adenoma in 3 years or less, and 80% would survey 2 tubular adenomas in 3 years or less.

    Limitations: The results are based on physicians' self-reported practices from clinical vignettes and may not match actual practice.

    Conclusion: Primary care physicians recommend postpolypectomy colonoscopic surveillance more frequently than is recommended by practice guidelines, especially if the colonoscopy showed a hyperplastic polyp or a single small adenoma.

    Article and Author Information

    • Note: This study was orally presented at the American College of Gastroenterology Annual Meeting, 28 October–2 November 2005, Honolulu, Hawaii, and published in abstract form (Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:S384-S385). It was selected for the ACG/Olympus Award for the category “Colorectal Cancer Prevention.”

    • Grant Support: Dr. Chak is supported by a K24 Midcareer Award in Patient Oriented Research (DK002800). Dr. Cooper is an Established Investigator in Cancer Prevention, Control and Population Science from the National Cancer Institute (K05 CA90677).

    • Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

    • Requests for Single Reprints: Vikram Boolchand, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245028, Tucson, AZ 85724; e-mail, vikramboolchand{at}yahoo.com.

    • Current Author Addresses: Drs. Boolchand and J. Singh: Department of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106.

    • Dr. Olds: Department of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48202.

    • Dr. P. Singh: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, 1901 South 1st Street, Temple, TX 76504.

    • Drs. Chak and Cooper: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106.

    • Author Contributions: Conception and design: V. Boolchand, G. Olds, P. Singh, A. Chak, G.S. Cooper.

    • Analysis and interpretation of the data: V. Boolchand, A. Chak, G.S. Cooper.

    • Drafting of the article: V. Boolchand, J. Singh, A. Chak, G.S. Cooper.

    • Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: V. Boolchand, G. Olds, P. Singh, A. Chak, G.S. Cooper.

    • Final approval of the article: V. Boolchand, G. Olds, P. Singh, A. Chak, G.S. Cooper.

    • Provision of study materials or patients: V. Boolchand, G. Olds, P. Singh.

    • Statistical expertise: G.S. Cooper.

    • Obtaining of funding: A. Chak.

    • Administrative, technical, or logistic support: V. Boolchand, G.S. Cooper.

    • Collection and assembly of data: V. Boolchand, J. Singh.

    Responses to this article

    Summary for Patients

    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents