Reporting of Drug Tolerance in Randomized Clinical Trials: When Data Conflict with Authors' Conclusions

  1. Annie Pierre Jonville-Béra, MD;
  2. Bruno Giraudeau, PhD; and
  3. Elisabeth Autret-Leca, MD
  1. From University Hospital of Tours, 37044 Tours, France.

    TO THE EDITOR:

    Background: Double-blind randomized trials that compare the efficacy of a new drug with an older drug or with placebo also often provide information regarding safety. When these findings are published, some authors conclude that the new drug has a “good safety profile” just because they failed to find any statistical difference in frequencies of adverse effects.

    Objective: The goal of this study is to illustrate this misreporting of data and to propose parameters that would promote more objective reports of safety results.

    Methods: We selected 2 published clinical trials (1, 2) that compared pharmacologic treatments for which the authors clearly stated that there was no difference in the occurrence of adverse effects. We …

    This 100-word excerpt has been provided in the absence of an abstract.

    | Table of Contents
    Most Read Most Read
    Most Commented Most Commented On
    Annals in the News Annals in the News
    Clinical Trials Clinical Trials
    Comparative Effectiveness Comparative Effectiveness
    Hospital Medicine Hospital Medicine
    • Advertisement
    • Advertisement