High-Dosage Vitamin E Supplementation and All-Cause Mortality
- Edgar R. Miller III, MD, PhD;
- Lawrence J. Appel, MD, MPH;
- Eliseo Guallar, MD, DrPH; and
- Roberto Pastor-Barriuso, PhD
- From Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21205, and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
•Type with double-spacing
•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
IN RESPONSE:
Since the publication of our vitamin E dose–response meta-analysis, we have received hundreds of e-mails, letters, and phone calls as well as more than 40 Letters to the Editor submitted electronically. Annals has asked us to prepare a written response to 11 selected letters.
Blatt and Pryor and Krishnan and associates hypothesize that natural vitamin E supplements have greater benefit than synthetic vitamin E supplements, even though no trial has directly compared them on mortality outcomes. In response, we have performed a subgroup analysis comparing the 4 trials using natural supplements, all high-dosage (400 IU/d), with high-dosage trials using the synthetic form. The relative risks for all-cause mortality in the 4 trials that provided natural vitamin E were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.12) in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) (1), 1.83 (CI, 0.88 to 3.78) in the VECAT study (2), 1.22 (CI, 0.86 to 1.73) in CHAOS (3, 4 …
RSS Feeds









