Plasma Exchange When Myeloma Presents as Acute Renal Failure

A Randomized, Controlled Trial

  1. William F. Clark, MD;
  2. A. Keith Stewart, MD;
  3. Gail A. Rock, MD;
  4. Marion Sternbach, MD;
  5. David M. Sutton, MD;
  6. Brendan J. Barrett, MD;
  7. A. Paul Heidenheim, MA;
  8. Amit X. Garg, MD;
  9. David N. Churchill, MD; and
  10. the Canadian Apheresis Group
  1. From University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.

    Abstract

    Background: Two small, randomized trials provide conflicting evidence about the benefits of plasma exchange for patients with acute renal failure at the onset of multiple myeloma.

    Objective: To assess the effect of 5 to 7 plasma exchanges on a composite outcome in patients with acute renal failure at the onset of multiple myeloma.

    Design: Randomized, open, controlled trial, stratified by chemotherapy and dialysis dependence, conducted from 1998 to 2004.

    Setting: Hospital plasma exchange units in 14 Canadian medical centers.

    Participants: 104 patients between 18 and 81 years of age with acute renal failure at the onset of myeloma.

    Intervention: Study participants were randomly assigned to conventional therapy plus 5 to 7 plasma exchanges of 50 mL per kg of body weight of 5% human serum albumin for 10 days or conventional therapy alone. Ninety-seven participants completed the 6-month follow-up.

    Measurements: The primary outcome was a composite measure of death, dialysis dependence, or glomerular filtration rate less than 0.29 mL·s−2·m−2 (<30 mL/min per 1.73 m2).

    Results: At enrollment, the plasma exchange and control groups were similar for dialysis dependence, chemotherapy, sex, age, hypercalcemia, serum albumin level, 24-hour urine protein level, serum creatinine level, and Durie–Salmon staging. The primary composite end point occurred in 33 of 57 (57.9%) patients in the plasma exchange group and in 27 of 39 (69.2%) patients in the control group (difference between groups, 11.3% [95% CI, −8.3% to 29.1%]; P = 0.36). One third of patients in each group died.

    Limitations: The study was small, used a composite outcome, and did not use renal biopsy as an inclusion criterion. Recruiting physicians were blinded to treatment allocation but not to treatment thereafter.

    Conclusions: In patients with acute renal failure at the onset of multiple myeloma, there is no conclusive evidence that 5 to 7 plasma exchanges substantially reduce a composite outcome of death, dialysis dependence, or glomerular filtration rate less than 0.29 mL·s−2·m−2 (<30 mL/min per 1.73 m2) at 6 months.

    Article and Author Information

    • ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00120263.

    • Grant Support: By the Canadian Institute of Health Research, Gambro BCT, and The Kidney Foundation of Canada.

    • Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: Grants received: W.F. Clark (Kidney Foundation of Canada, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Gambro BCT).

    • Requests for Single Reprints: William F. Clark, MD, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, Ontario N6A 4G5, Canada.

    • Current Author Addresses: Drs. Clark and Garg and Mr. Heidenheim: London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, Ontario N6A 4G5, Canada.

    • Dr. Stewart: Princess Margaret Hospital, 620 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C1, Canada.

    • Dr. Rock: The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada.

    • Drs. Sternbach and Churchill: McMaster University, St. Joseph's Hospital, 50 Charlton East, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 1A6, Canada.

    • Dr. Sutton: Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario M5C 2G4, Canada.

    • Dr. Barrett: Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. Johns, Newfoundland A1B 3V6, Canada.

    • Author Contributions: Conception and design: W.F. Clark, A.K. Stewart, G.A. Rock, M. Sternbach, B.J. Barrett, A.P. Heidenheim, D.N. Churchill.

    • Analysis and interpretation of the data: W.F. Clark, A.K. Stewart, B.J. Barrett, A.P. Heidenheim, A.X. Garg, D.N. Churchill.

    • Drafting of the article: W.F. Clark, A.K. Stewart, A.P. Heidenheim, D.N. Churchill.

    • Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: W.F. Clark, A.K. Stewart, M. Sternbach, D.M. Sutton, B.J. Barrett, A.P. Heidenheim, A.X. Garg, D.N. Churchill.

    • Final approval of the article: W.F. Clark, A.K. Stewart, A.X. Garg, D.N. Churchill.

    • Provision of study materials or patients: W.F. Clark, G.A. Rock, M. Sternbach, D.M. Sutton, D.N. Churchill.

    • Statistical expertise: W.F. Clark, A.P. Heidenheim, A.X. Garg, D.N. Churchill.

    • Obtaining of funding: W.F. Clark, A.K. Stewart, D.N. Churchill.

    • Administrative, technical, or logistic support: W.F. Clark, G.A. Rock.

    • Collection and assembly of data: W.F. Clark, A.P. Heidenheim, D.N. Churchill.

    Comments on This Article

    Related Article

    | Table of Contents
    Most Read Most Read
    Most Commented Most Commented On
    Annals in the News Annals in the News
    Clinical Trials Clinical Trials
    Comparative Effectiveness Comparative Effectiveness
    Hospital Medicine Hospital Medicine
    • Advertisement
    • Advertisement