Patient Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation

  1. Juan Carlos Souto, MD, PhD;
  2. Bárbara Menéndez-Jándula, MD; and
  3. Jordi Fontcuberta, MD, PhD
  1. From the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.

    The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

    •Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

    •Type with double-spacing

    •Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

    Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

    Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.

    IN RESPONSE:

    The main purpose of our study was to evaluate the reliability of self-management (with all of its theoretical advantages, including ease for weekly testing at home) in comparison with the actual management of anticoagulant therapy in Spanish clinics. In most Spanish clinics, the number of patients each clinic sees makes weekly monitoring almost impossible. For example, in our clinic, we monitor more than 6000 patients each month. Maybe the ideal design of our study would have included the same interval between tests in both arms, but in our opinion the results would not have been applicable to real-life practice.

    In contrast to Dr. Wheeler's experience, our results were accurate and consistent using the portable monitor (CoaguChek S, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) in a previous pilot study. We compared the INR results of 150 patients obtained simultaneously with the portable coagulometer and through our laboratory (KC 10 coagulometer, Amelung, Lemgo, Germany). The correlation coefficient was 0.95 (unpublished data). This excellent agreement between the use of CoaguChek devices and standard laboratory coagulometers has been reported elsewhere (1). In our trial, we found the mean percentage of in-range INRs (± SD) to be statistically significantly higher in the self-management group (58.6% ± 14.3%) than in the conventional management group (55.6% ± 19.6%), although we considered this difference irrelevant from a clinical point of view. Of course, the intended INR target ranges were the same width in both comparison groups.

    We believe that the most important result from our study relates to the safety of self-management, not the efficacy of testing (which was at least as good in the self-management group as in the conventional group). We observed an impressive reduction (70%) in major complications and in minor hemorrhages in the self-management group, as well as a trend toward reduced mortality. For these reasons, we agree with Beyth (2) that a patient–professional partnership in long-term anticoagulation can reduce the incidence of very serious related complications and that this model of care requires a shift in focus and resources by health care systems and providers.

    The new thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran is a very promising drug, with clinical outcomes similar to those seen with conventionally managed warfarin (3). It would be interesting to compare the use of ximelagatran with patient self-management using warfarin in appropriate clinical trials, considering that self-management by trained patients taking warfarin can result in severe complications in 1% or less of patient-years (4).

    Juan Carlos Souto, MD, PhD

    Bárbara Menéndez-Jándula, MD

    Jordi Fontcuberta, MD, PhD

    Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    08025 Barcelona, Spain

    The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

    •Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

    •Type with double-spacing

    •Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

    Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

    Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.

    Article and Author Information

    • Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

    References

    1. 1.
    2. 2.
    3. 3.
    4. 4.
    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents