Itraconazole versus Fluconazole for Antifungal Prophylaxis

  1. Drew J. Winston, MD;
  2. Richard T. Maziarz; and
  3. Pranatharthi H. Chandrasekar, MD
  1. From University of California, Los Angeles, Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97232; and Harper University Hospital, Detroit, MI 48201.

    The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

    •Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

    •Type with double-spacing

    •Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

    Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

    Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.

    IN RESPONSE:

    We do not dispute the efficacy of fluconazole for prevention of Candida infections in transplant recipients (1, 2). However, the usefulness of fluconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplants has recently been compromised by the increasing incidence of Aspergillus and certain fluconazole-resistant Candida infections. Furthermore, while the Seattle study reported improved long-term survival in patients receiving prophylactic fluconazole after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (3), these …

    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents