RSS Feeds
Quadriceps Strength and Osteoarthritis Progression in Malaligned and Lax Knees
- Leena Sharma, MD;
- Dorothy D. Dunlop, PhD; and
- Karen W. Hayes, PhD
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
•Type with double-spacing
•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
IN RESPONSE:
To Dr. Judge, we respond that we too are concerned about errors in the description of our findings and their implications. Our study dealt with the relationship between strength and progression in osteoarthritic knees that were also malaligned or lax. Strength had no deleterious effect in more neutral or stable knees. Also, we stated that these results have no implications for aerobic exercise or physical activity in general. It was important to report our results, regardless of whether they match what has been believed (in the absence of data) about the effect of strength on disease progression in knee osteoarthritis. Descriptive data for quadriceps strength in the sample were provided. Strength cutoffs in healthy persons and persons with osteoarthritis have not been established. Our results were not altered by separately adjusting for body mass (that is, weight) and height rather than BMI. In response to the comments of Dr. Moore, we point out that, as stated in the final paragraph of our Results section, strength was measured at baseline and at 18 months, and minimal change occurred. Further analyses revealed that the mean change in strength (a slight increase) did not differ between stronger and weaker participants; that the proportion of participants who lost strength was similar in stronger and weaker participants (for example, for 10% loss, the proportions were 20% and 19%, respectively); and that among those who declined in strength, the magnitude of decline did not differ between stronger and weaker participants. The results presented in our paper were adjusted for average physical activity. In theory, in some individuals, physical activity in the past may have contributed to disease development; the results presented in the paper are also adjusted for baseline disease severity.
Leena Sharma, MD
Dorothy D. Dunlop, PhD
Karen W. Hayes, PhD
Northwestern University; Chicago, IL 60611
- Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians
