Quality of Care in Patients with Diabetes

  1. Rhoda H. Cobin, MD; and
  2. Helena W. Rodbard, MD
  1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Jacksonville, FL 32204 (Cobin) American College of Endocrinology, Jacksonville, FL 32204 (Rodbard)

    The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

    •Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

    •Type with double-spacing

    •Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

    Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

    Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.

    TO THE EDITOR:

    The Board of Directors of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and the Trustees of the American College of Endocrinology (ACE) express their unanimous concern about conclusions reached by, and generalizations stemming from, the study by Greenfield and colleagues on profiling care by different groups of physicians (1). Their findings are of indeterminate validity because of multiple methodologic flaws. Although we applaud the authors for their enhanced statistical approach to assessing the quality of medical care received by persons with diabetes, they may have inadvertently introduced enough noise into the data to bias their results.

    We are further disappointed that Annals of Internal Medicine distributed a Summary for Patients (2) that uncritically accepted the conclusions of the paper; assumed that these conclusions may be extrapolated to physician practices in general; and distributed the findings as oversimplified “facts” to patients, payers, and the medical community at large. High stakes …

    This 100-word excerpt has been provided in the absence of an abstract.

    | Table of Contents
    Most Read Most Read
    Most Commented Most Commented On
    Annals in the News Annals in the News
    Clinical Trials Clinical Trials
    Comparative Effectiveness Comparative Effectiveness
    Hospital Medicine Hospital Medicine
    • Advertisement
    • Advertisement