A More Accurate Method To Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Creatinine: A New Prediction Equation

  1. Andrew S. Levey, MD;
  2. Juan P. Bosch, MD;
  3. Julia Breyer Lewis, MD;
  4. Tom Greene, PhD;
  5. Nancy Rogers, MS;
  6. David Roth, MD; and
  7. for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group*

    Abstract

    Background: Serum creatinine concentration is widely used as an index of renal function, but this concentration is affected by factors other than glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

    Objective: To develop an equation to predict GFR from serum creatinine concentration and other factors.

    Design: Cross-sectional study of GFR, creatinine clearance, serum creatinine concentration, and demographic and clinical characteristics in patients with chronic renal disease.

    Patients: 1628 patients enrolled in the baseline period of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study, of whom 1070 were randomly selected as the training sample; the remaining 558 patients constituted the validation sample.

    Methods: The prediction equation was developed by stepwise regression applied to the training sample. The equation was then tested and compared with other prediction equations in the validation sample.

    Results: To simplify prediction of GFR, the equation included only demographic and serum variables. Independent factors associated with a lower GFR included a higher serum creatinine concentration, older age, female sex, nonblack ethnicity, higher serum urea nitrogen levels, and lower serum albumin levels (P < 0.001 for all factors). The multiple regression model explained 90.3% of the variance in the logarithm of GFR in the validation sample. Measured creatinine clearance overestimated GFR by 19%, and creatinine clearance predicted by the Cockcroft-Gault formula overestimated GFR by 16%. After adjustment for this overestimation, the percentage of variance of the logarithm of GFR predicted by measured creatinine clearance or the Cockcroft-Gault formula was 86.6% and 84.2%, respectively.

    Conclusion: The equation developed from the MDRD Study provided a more accurate estimate of GFR in our study group than measured creatinine clearance or other commonly used equations.

    *For members of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group, see N Engl J Med. 1994; 330:877-84.

    Article and Author Information

    • Presented in part at the Seventh International Congress on Nutrition and Metabolism in Renal Disease, Stockholm, Sweden, 29 May-1 June 1994, and the 30th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, San Antonio, Texas, 2-6 November 1997.

    • Grant Support: By the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the Health Care Financing Administration.

    • Requests for Reprints: Andrew S. Levey, MD, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Box 391, Boston, MA 02111.

    • Current Author Addresses: Dr. Levey: New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Box 391, Boston, MA 02111; e-mail, Andrew.Levey{at}es.nemc.org.

    • Dr. Bosch: George Washington University, 901 23rd Street SW, Washington, DC 20037.

    • Dr. Lewis and Ms. Rogers: Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 22nd Avenue S, Nashville, TN 37232.

    • Dr. Greene: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195.

    • Dr. Roth: University of Miami Medical Center, 1475 NW 12th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136.

    | Table of Contents
    Most Read Most Read
    Most Commented Most Commented On
    Annals in the News Annals in the News
    Clinical Trials Clinical Trials
    Comparative Effectiveness Comparative Effectiveness
    Hospital Medicine Hospital Medicine
    • Advertisement
    • Advertisement