A More Accurate Method To Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Creatinine: A New Prediction Equation

  1. Andrew S. Levey, MD;
  2. Juan P. Bosch, MD;
  3. Julia Breyer Lewis, MD;
  4. Tom Greene, PhD;
  5. Nancy Rogers, MS;
  6. David Roth, MD; and
  7. for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group*

    Abstract

    Background: Serum creatinine concentration is widely used as an index of renal function, but this concentration is affected by factors other than glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

    Objective: To develop an equation to predict GFR from serum creatinine concentration and other factors.

    Design: Cross-sectional study of GFR, creatinine clearance, serum creatinine concentration, and demographic and clinical characteristics in patients with chronic renal disease.

    Patients: 1628 patients enrolled in the baseline period of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study, of whom 1070 were randomly selected as the training sample; the remaining 558 patients constituted the validation sample.

    Methods: The prediction equation was developed by stepwise regression applied to the training sample. The equation was then tested and compared with other prediction equations in the validation sample.

    Results: To simplify prediction of GFR, the equation included only demographic and serum variables. Independent factors associated with a lower GFR included a higher serum creatinine concentration, older age, female sex, nonblack ethnicity, higher serum urea nitrogen levels, and lower serum albumin levels (P < 0.001 for all factors). The multiple regression model explained 90.3% of the variance in the logarithm of GFR in the validation sample. Measured creatinine clearance overestimated GFR by 19%, and creatinine clearance predicted by the Cockcroft-Gault formula overestimated GFR by 16%. After adjustment for this overestimation, the percentage of variance of the logarithm of GFR predicted by measured creatinine clearance or the Cockcroft-Gault formula was 86.6% and 84.2%, respectively.

    Conclusion: The equation developed from the MDRD Study provided a more accurate estimate of GFR in our study group than measured creatinine clearance or other commonly used equations.

    *For members of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group, see N Engl J Med. 1994; 330:877-84.

    Article and Author Information

    • Presented in part at the Seventh International Congress on Nutrition and Metabolism in Renal Disease, Stockholm, Sweden, 29 May-1 June 1994, and the 30th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, San Antonio, Texas, 2-6 November 1997.

    • Grant Support: By the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the Health Care Financing Administration.

    • Requests for Reprints: Andrew S. Levey, MD, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Box 391, Boston, MA 02111.

    • Current Author Addresses: Dr. Levey: New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Box 391, Boston, MA 02111; e-mail, Andrew.Levey{at}es.nemc.org.

    • Dr. Bosch: George Washington University, 901 23rd Street SW, Washington, DC 20037.

    • Dr. Lewis and Ms. Rogers: Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 22nd Avenue S, Nashville, TN 37232.

    • Dr. Greene: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195.

    • Dr. Roth: University of Miami Medical Center, 1475 NW 12th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136.

    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents