Misoprostol and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
•Type with double-spacing
•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
TO THE EDITOR:
We would like to address some points raised in the editorial by Dr. Levine [1] that accompanied our recent article [2].
As Dr. Levine notes, our trial was the first to provide strong evidence that misoprostol is effective in reducing the risk for serious NSAID-related complications (bleeding, obstruction, and perforation). Reductions in NSAID complications have not been shown by any other medication.
Dr. Levine refers to “infrequent” serious gastrointestinal outcomes related to NSAID use. Although we agree that the absolute risk for these complications is low, widespread NSAID use—14 million regular users in the United States [3]—indicates a serious health care problem. An annual incidence of 1% translates into an annual occurrence of approximately 140 000 NSAID-related complications that are associated with considerable morbidity, mortality, and costs. The finding that misoprostol reduces the incidence of NSAID-related complications by 40% has important implications for patient care.
We agree that it would be inappropriate to give misoprostol to all persons receiving long-term NSAID therapy. The results of our study, however, defined four risk factors for serious NSAID-related complications: advanced age, history of peptic ulcer disease, history of gastrointestinal bleeding, and history of cardiovascular disease. The identification of such risk factors is important and allows physicians to make rational decisions about a patient's need for misoprostol. For example, in our study, patients with none of the identified risk factors had a less than 1% risk for NSAID-related complications in a 6-month period, whereas those with all four factors had a greater than 10-fold increase in risk.
Previous pharmacoeconomic analyses have concluded that the use of misoprostol to prevent NSAID-induced ulcers is cost-effective in high-risk groups [4]. The results of our trial support the benefits of misoprostol, especially in high-risk patients.
Fred E. Silverstein, MD
University of Washington Medical School
Seattle, WA 98195
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
•Type with double-spacing
•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
- Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians
RSS Feeds









