Return to Work after Uncomplicated Myocardial Infarction: A Trial of Practice Guidelines in the Community
- Louise Pilote, MD, MPH;
- Randal J. Thomas, MD, MS;
- Charles Dennis, MD;
- Patricia Goins, BSN;
- Nancy Houston-Miller, BSN;
- Helena Kraemer, PhD;
- Cheryl Leong;
- Walter E. Berger III, MD;
- Henry Lew, MD;
- Robert S. Heller, MD;
- Jonathan Rompf, MD; and
- Robert F. DeBusk, MD
Abstract
▪ Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of practice guidelines for return to work after acute myocardial infarction when disseminated from a university-based setting to a practice-based setting.
▪ Design: Randomized clinical trial.
▪ Patients: A total of 187 patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction.
▪ Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 95) or to usual care (n = 92). The intervention consisted of a treadmill test, a counseling session based on the test results, and a consultation letter from a cardiologist to the primary care physician. Individualized recommendations for the timing of return to work, contained in the consultation letter, were based on the patient's risk for recurrent cardiac events.
▪ Measurements: Questionnaire, chart review, and a phone interview documented the timing of return to work and the rates of cardiac death, coronary angioplasty, coronary artery surgery, and recurrent myocardial infarction.
▪ Results: Median intervals between acute myocardial infarction and return to work were similar in both groups (intervention, 54 days; usual care, 67 days; P > 0. 2). Among patients without myocardial ischemia, however, the interval was shorter in the intervention group than in the usual care group (38 days compared with 65 days, respectively, P = 0.008). Among patients with myocardial ischemia, intervals were similar in both groups (80 days compared with 76 days, respectively, P > 0.2).
▪ Conclusion: Practice guidelines developed in a university-based setting were not as successful in hastening return to work after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction when tested in a practice-based setting. Physicians' reluctance to follow guidelines for patients with myocardial ischemia reflected their concern with prognosis even though medical outcome was good.
Article and Author Information
-
From the Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; and the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, California. For current author addresses, see end of text.
-
Grant Support: By grant HL36734 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
-
Requests for Reprints: Robert F. DeBusk, MD, Stanford Cardiac Rehabilitation Program, 780 Welch Road, Suite 106, Palo Alto, CA 94304.
-
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Pilote, Thomas, Kraemer, DeBusk, Ms. Leong, Ms. Houston-Miller: Stanford Cardiac Rehabilitation Program, 780 Welch Road, Suite 106, Palo Alto, CA 94304.
Dr. Dennis: Deborah Heart and Lung Center, 200 Trenton Road, Browns Mills, NJ 08015-1799.
Ms. Goins: 10666 N. Torrey Pines Road MLS SW 206, La Jolla, CA 92037.
Dr. Berger: Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 1150 Veterans Boulevard, Redwood City, CA 94063.
Dr. Lew: Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 900 Kiely Boulevard, Santa Clara, CA 95051.
Dr. Heller: The Permanente Medical Group, 27400 Hesperian Boulevard, Hayward, CA 94545.
Dr. Rompf: Kaiser Santa Theresa Community Hospital, 250 Hospital Parkway, San Jose, CA 95119.
- ©1992 American College of Physicians
RSS Feeds









