RSS Feeds
Preventive Health Strategies and the Policy Makers' Paradox
- Eric Y. Brown, MD;
- Catherine M. Viscoli, PhD; and
- Ralph I. Horwitz, MD
Abstract
▪ The likelihood of developing many diseases is predicted by levels of risk factors. Many public health strategies have been created to apply interventions (for example, drugs, diets, exercise) intended to lower levels of these factors and thereby prevent disease. Often, these strategies are based on the interpretation of incomplete evidence for the effectiveness of the interventions. The reason this evidence is and will likely remain incomplete is explained by the policy makers' paradox. The paradox occurs when evidence for an intervention's effectiveness is obtained in persons with the highest levels of a risk factor, but the application of the intervention may have the greatest potential for reducing disease burden in persons with lower levels. Resolution of the paradox requires consideration of the type and quality of evidence, the society's time preference for risk, and the society's choice about allocation of scarce resources.
Article and Author Information
-
From the Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. For current author addresses, see end of text.
-
Grant Support: By the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation grant 87-3295 and by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on the Determinants and Consequences of Health Promoting and Health Damaging Behavior.
-
Requests for Reprints: Eric Brown, MD, Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, 2073 LMP, New Haven, CT 06510-8056.
-
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Brown: Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, 2073 LMP, New Haven, CT 06510-8056.
Drs. Viscoli and Horwitz: Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, IE-61, P.O. Box 3333, New Haven, CT 06510-8025.
- © 1992 American College of Physicians
