Hemoccult Screening in Detecting Colorectal Neoplasm: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Value

Long-Term Follow-up in a Large Group Practice Setting

Abstract

Study Objective: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of Hemoccult II tests for detecting colorectal neoplasm (colorectal carcinoma or polyp or both).

Study Design: Prospective analyses of asymptomatic patients ( ≥ 45 years) followed for 4 years after screening with Hemoccult II testing and retrospective analyses of patients with known colorectal carcinoma or polyps or both who had Hemoccult II testing within 2 years of diagnosis.

Setting: A large, health maintenance organization practice.

Measurements and Main Results: In the prospective analysis, the sensitivity of Hemoccult II was 50% for colorectal carcinoma diagnosed within 1 year of testing, 43% within 2 years, and 25% within 4 years. For polyps, sensitivity was 36% at 1 year, 28% at 2 years, and 17% at 4 years. Specificity was 99%. The predictive value of a positive test for colorectal carcinoma was 8% at 1 year, 10% at 2 years, and 11 % at 4 years. On the basis of the retrospective analyses, the sensitivity of Hemoccult II for colorectal carcinoma diagnosed within 1 year of testing was 66% and was 61% within 2 years. Many of these patients had symptoms when tested.

Conclusions: An asymptomatic patient age 45 or older with a positive Hemoccult II test has about a chance of 1 in 10 for having colorectal carcinoma and a 1-in-3 chance of having either a colorectal carcinoma or polyp: The same patient with a negative Hemoccult test has a 0.2% chance of having a colorectal carcinoma diagnosed within 2 years of testing and a 0.7% chance of having a polyp. Within 4 years of testing the chance increases to 0.5% for colorectal carcinoma and 1.5% for polyps. If Hemoccult II slides are the only screening method used for detecting asymptomatic colorectal neoplasms, 50% to 60% of lesions will remain undetected. Clinical interpretation of Hemoccult screening requires appreciation of its limits as well as its benefits.

Article and Author Information

  • From the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center and Medical Care Program, Oakland, California. For current author addresses, see end of text.

  • Grant Support: By the Community Service Program of Kaiser Foundation Hospitals.

  • Requests for Reprints: James E. Allison, MD, Department of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 280 W. MacArthur Boulevard, Oakland, CA 94611-5463.

  • Current Author Addresses: Dr. Allison: Department of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 280 W. MacArthur Boulevard, Oakland, CA 94611-5463.

    Dr. Feldman: 36 Northgate Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94708.

    Ms. Tekawa: Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Division of Research, 3451 Piedmont Avenue, Oakland, CA 94611-5463.

| Table of Contents
Most Read Most Read
Most Commented Most Commented On
Annals in the News Annals in the News
Clinical Trials Clinical Trials
Comparative Effectiveness Comparative Effectiveness
Hospital Medicine Hospital Medicine
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement