RSS Feeds
A Proposal for More Informative Abstracts of Clinical Articles
- AD HOC WORKING GROUP FOR CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE MEDICAL LITERATURE*
Abstract
Medical journals are a principal source of new knowledge for clinicians. Unfortunately, articles containing valid and valuable information are often buried among others of less value. Innovations are needed to assist clinicians in finding articles that are both scientifically sound and applicable to their practices. An easily implemented, although partial, solution is for authors of articles that have clinical implications to structure their abstracts so that key aspects of purpose, methods, and results are reported with a partly controlled vocabulary and in a standardized format. This would assist clinical readers to select appropriate articles more quickly, allow more precise computerized literature searches, and facilitate peer review before publication.
- abstracting and indexing
- biomedical journals
- cohort
- computerized literature searching
- computer systems
- controlled vocabulary
- cost benefit analysis
- cost effectiveness analysis
- criterion standard
- inception cohort
- intervention trials
- literature
- MEDLARS-MEDLINE information system
- patients
- peer review
- prognosis studies
- publishing
- screening and diagnostic tests
- selection procedures
- study design
- subject headings
Article and Author Information
-
↵* See Appendix 2 for list of members.
-
▸Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to R. Brian Haynes, M.D.; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Medical Center, 1200 Main Street W.; Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada.
- © 1987 American College of Physicians
