Search Annals: Advanced search

Rapid Responses to:

Academia and Clinic: Janelle Guirguis-Blake, Ned Calonge, Therese Miller, Albert Siu, Steven Teutsch, Evelyn Whitlock for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Current Processes of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Refining Evidence-Based Recommendation Development Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 117-122 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]

Send comment/rapid response letter

Electronic letters published:

'No Recommendation' is NOT a recommendation

gowdara divakara murthy   (12 July 2007)

'No Recommendation' is NOT a recommendation 12 July 2007
gowdara divakara murthy, m.d. stratton Veterans Affairs Medical center Send rapid response to journal: Re: 'No Recommendation' is NOT a recommendation murthy.divakara{at}va.gov gowdara divakara murthy	United States Preventive and Services task Force (USPSTF) has done an excellent job over the years at educating medical professionals and the public regarding screening for and prevention of diseases. In the current issue of Annals Of Internal Medicine, the task force is refining evidence- based recommendation development. I have some comments and suggestions for the Task Force to consider. Lately I have seen under ‘summary of recommendation’, common statement such as ‘ The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that the evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against routine screening for….’. The list of some of the diseases for which such recommendations (for adults) are made is as follows. Table: Diseases for which there are no recommendations for or against screening. Lung cancer oral cancer prostate cancer skin cancer vitamins to prevent cancer and cardiovascular disease screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men 65-75 years of age who never smoked hepatitis C in high risk persons family and intimate partner violence dementia suicide risk promote a healthy diet behavioral counseling to promote physical activity thyroid disease type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes low back pain bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women glaucoma I Believe, if such a statement needs to be made it should be under ‘summary of evidence’ and not under ‘summary of recommendation’. If there is no recommendation to be made for or against then, the Task Force may want to refrain from making any recommendation. Making such recommendations is ambiguous and conflicting. For example, a smoker who was not screened and develops lung cancer may wonder why he/she was not screened for it as there is no recommendation against screening. Conflict of Interest: None declared