Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Correction
space
 arrow  Correction
space
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Abstract of this article Free
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients (PDF)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Video News Release
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Published comments/rapid response letters
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS

Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations

6 September 2005 | Volume 143 Issue 5 | Page I-47

Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.

Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.

The summary below is from the full reports titled "Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Recommendation Statement" and "Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force." They are in the 6 September 2005 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 143, pages 355-361 and 362-379). The first report was written by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; the second report was written by H.D. Nelson, L. Hoyt Huffman, R. Fu, and E.L. Harris.


Who developed these guidelines?
space

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is a group of health experts that reviews published research and makes recommendations about preventive health care.


What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
space

Many women with breast cancer have first-degree (mother, sister, daughter) or second-degree (aunt) relatives with breast cancer. Mutations on 2 genes have been shown to increase the risk for breast and ovarian cancer: breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2). These mutations are more common in certain ethnic groups, such as Ashkenazi Jewish individuals. However, not all women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer have one of these mutations and not all women with one of these mutations will develop cancer. Genetic testing could identify women who should consider intense cancer screening or procedures to reduce cancer risk (medication or surgical removal of breasts, ovaries, or both). However, since not all women who have a BRCA mutation develop cancer, identification of mutations may also needlessly expose women to anxiety, insurance problems, or unnecessary procedures.


How did the USPSTF develop these recommendations?
space

The USPSTF reviewed published research to evaluate the benefits and harms of genetic assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility.


What did the authors find?
space

Little is known about BRCA mutations in the general population. Most studies of BRCA mutations have been done in women with existing cancer or strong family histories of cancer. Studies do not definitively prove that intensive screening improves cancer outcomes in women with BRCA mutations. Using medications to prevent cancer in women at high risk does reduce cancer, but these medications also cause side effects. Surgical removal of the breasts and ovaries does reduce the development of cancer in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. However, surgery always carries the risk for complications and these surgeries can decrease quality of life for some women.


What does the USPSTF suggest that patients and doctors do?
space

Doctors and patients should be aware of the family history patterns that are associated with an increased risk for BRCA mutations. In women who are not of Ashkenazi (Eastern European) Jewish heritage, these include 2 first-degree relatives with breast cancer, at least 1 of whom received a diagnosis at age 50 years or younger; 3 or more first- or second-degree relatives with breast cancer diagnosed at any age; a first-degree relative with bilateral breast cancer diagnosed at any age; a combination of 2 or more first- or second-degree relatives with ovarian cancer diagnosed at any age; and a male relative with breast cancer. For women of Ashkenazi (Eastern European) Jewish heritage, these include any first-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer at any age or at least 2 second-degree relatives on the same side of the family with breast or ovarian cancer at any age.

The USPSTF recommends against referral for genetic evaluation if a woman's family history does not suggest an increased risk for BRCA mutations. The USPSTF recommends referral of women whose family history is associated with an increased risk for harmful mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 to suitably trained health care providers.


What are the cautions related to these recommendations?
space

These recommendations do not apply to women with a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer or with a family member who has a known BRCA mutation.


Find additional patient-related information at:

Little Known About Breast Cancer Genes in Minority Families

Related articles in Annals:

Clinical Guidelines
Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Heidi D. Nelson, Laurie Hoyt Huffman, Rongwei Fu, AND Emily L. Harris
Annals 2005 143: 362-379. [ABSTRACT][SUMMARY][Full Text]  

Editorials
Taking Family History Seriously
Wylie Burke
Annals 2005 143: 388-389. [Full Text]  

Summaries for Patients
Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations
Annals 2005 143: I-47. [Full Text]  

Letters
Correction: Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility
Annals 2005 143: 547. [Full Text]  

Letters
Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing
Kelly E. Ormond, Cecelia Bellcross, AND Scott Weissman
Annals 2006 144: 303-304. [Full Text]  

Letters
Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing
The Editors
Annals 2006 144: 304. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M. E Wood, A. Stockdale, and B. S Flynn
Interviews with primary care physicians regarding taking and interpreting the cancer family history
Fam. Pract., September 1, 2008; (2008) cmn053v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
BRCA Screening
Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2008; 111(5): 1205 - 1206.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. Fatouros, G. Baltoyiannis, and D. H. Roukos
The Predominant Role of Surgery in the Prevention and New Trends in the Surgical Treatment of Women With BRCA1/2 Mutations
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 21 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. C. O'Neill, N. T. Brewer, S. E. Lillie, E. F. Morrill, E. C. Dees, L. A. Carey, and B. K. Rimer
Women's Interest in Gene Expression Analysis for Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk
J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2007; 25(29): 4628 - 4634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
W. Burke and B. M. Psaty
Personalized Medicine in the Era of Genomics
JAMA, October 10, 2007; 298(14): 1682 - 1684.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Robson and K. Offit
Management of an Inherited Predisposition to Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., July 12, 2007; 357(2): 154 - 162.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. N. Weitzel, V. I. Lagos, C. A. Cullinane, P. J. Gambol, J. O. Culver, K. R. Blazer, M. R. Palomares, K. J. Lowstuter, and D. J. MacDonald
Limited Family Structure and BRCA Gene Mutation Status in Single Cases of Breast Cancer
JAMA, June 20, 2007; 297(23): 2587 - 2595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. F. Hayes
Follow-up of Patients with Early Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., June 14, 2007; 356(24): 2505 - 2513.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
L. J. Spano
A terrible beauty: A physician's story of ovarian cancer
Can Fam Physician, June 1, 2007; 53(6): 983 - 985.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. Qaseem, V. Snow, K. Sherif, M. Aronson, K. B. Weiss, D. K. Owens, and for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee
Screening Mammography for Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians
Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 511 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. M. Swisher and M.-C. King
Defining Women at High Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Cancer Res., March 15, 2007; 67(6): 2902 - 2902.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
D. Saslow, C. Boetes, W. Burke, S. Harms, M. O. Leach, C. D. Lehman, E. Morris, E. Pisano, M. Schnall, S. Sener, et al.
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography
CA Cancer J Clin, March 1, 2007; 57(2): 75 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
J. Simard, M. Dumont, A.-M. Moisan, V. Gaborieau, H. Vezina, F. Durocher, J. Chiquette, M. Plante, D. Avard, P. Bessette, et al.
Evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation prevalence, risk prediction models and a multistep testing approach in French-Canadian families with high risk of breast and ovarian cancer
J. Med. Genet., February 1, 2007; 44(2): 107 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. S. Acheson, S. J. Zyzanski, K. C. Stange, A. Deptowicz, and G. L. Wiesner
Validation of a Self-Administered, Computerized Tool for Collecting and Displaying the Family History of Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 24(34): 5395 - 5402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. L. Khatcheressian, A. C. Wolff, T. J. Smith, E. Grunfeld, H. B. Muss, V. G. Vogel, F. Halberg, M. R. Somerfield, and N. E. Davidson
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 Update of the Breast Cancer Follow-Up and Management Guidelines in the Adjuvant Setting
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2006; 24(31): 5091 - 5097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. V. Lacey Jr, M. H. Greene, S. S. Buys, D. Reding, T. L. Riley, C. D. Berg, R. M. Fagerstrom, and P. Hartge
Ovarian Cancer Screening in Women With a Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer.
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2006; 108(5): 1176 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. T. Loud, N. E. Weissman, J. A. Peters, R. M. Giusti, B. S. Wilfond, W. Burke, and M. H. Greene
Deliberate Deceit of Family Members: A Challenge to Providers of Clinical Genetics Services
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 24(10): 1643 - 1646.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
Correction: Summary for Patients: Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility
Ann Intern Med, February 21, 2006; 144(4): 307 - 307.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
K. E. Ormond, C. Bellcross, and S. Weissman
Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing.
Ann Intern Med, February 21, 2006; 144(4): 303 - 304.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. L. Khatcheressian and T. J. Smith
Randomized Trial of Long-Term Follow-Up for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Family Physician Versus Specialist Care
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2006; 24(6): 835 - 837.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
USPSTF: Recommendations for BRCA Testing
Journal Watch Women's Health, November 22, 2005; 2005(1122): 6 - 6.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
USPSTF Recommends Against Routine BRCA Testing
Journal Watch (General), September 27, 2005; 2005(927): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
W. Burke
Taking Family History Seriously
Ann Intern Med, September 6, 2005; 143(5): 388 - 389.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Primum non nocere
Kevin M Zbuk, et al.
Annals Online, 22 Sep 2005 [Full text]
USPSTF guidelines will miss BRCA families due to paternal inheritance or a truncated family tree
Julie O. Culver, et al.
Annals Online, 13 Oct 2005 [Full text]

box Article
 arrow  Correction
space
 arrow  Correction
space
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Abstract of this article Free
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients (PDF)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Video News Release
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Published comments/rapid response letters
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Physicians.