Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Abstract of this article
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients (PDF)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Ornstein, S.
space
  arrow  Litvin, C.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS

A Comparison of Different Programs To Improve Preventive Care for Cardiovascular Conditions

5 October 2004 | Volume 141 Issue 7 | Page I-53

Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.

Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.

The summary below is from the full report titled "A Multimethod Quality Improvement Intervention To Improve Preventive Cardiovascular Care. A Cluster Randomized Trial." It is in the 5 October 2004 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 141, pages 523-532). The authors are S. Ornstein, R.G. Jenkins, P.J. Nietert, C. Feifer, L.F. Roylance, L. Nemeth, S. Corley, L. Dickerson, W.D. Bradford, and C. Litvin.


What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
space

Guidelines recommend that doctors incorporate many practices to prevent cardiovascular disease (heart attack and stroke) into routine health care for their patients. These practices include, for example, measurement of blood pressure and cholesterol level and treatment when either is high. Other recommended practices include certain tests and treatments for patients who have conditions such as heart failure or diabetes. Unfortunately, although guidelines recommend various interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease, doctors sometimes forget to include all of these interventions in the care of every patient. Many hospitals and other health care settings have developed programs to improve care, but these programs often have limited success. Some experts believe that quality improvement programs with multiple components are more effective than simpler programs.


Why did the researchers do this particular study?
space

To determine whether a program to improve preventive cardiovascular care that includes multiple components results in better care than a simpler program.


Who was studied?
space

20 primary care practices and more than 86 000 patients seen in those practices during the study.


How was the study done?
space

The researchers assigned each of the 20 practices to participate in either a simple or a multiple-component quality improvement program. The simple program gave each practice copies of guidelines for cardiovascular preventive care. Four times each year, the simple program also gave practices information about how they performed on each of 21 elements of care recommended in the guidelines. The multiple-component program included 6 to 7 practice site visits by quality improvement experts and 2 group meetings attended by representatives from each practice. In addition, the program provided the practices with copies of practice guidelines and performance reports.


What did the researchers find?
space

Patients in practices assigned to the multicomponent quality improvement program experienced greater improvements in the receipt of guideline-recommended care for cardiovascular disease than did patients in practices that received only the simple program.


What were the limitations of the study?
space

The study involved a small number of practices and examined only cardiovascular care.


What are the implications of the study?
space

Programs to improve quality of care seem to be more effective when they include site visits and quality improvement meetings and provide practices with copies of the guidelines and performance reports.


Related articles in Annals:

Summaries for Patients
A Comparison of Different Programs To Improve Preventive Care for Cardiovascular Conditions
Annals 2004 141: I-53. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
J. G. Zapka
Prevention Research and Reality: Narrowing the Quality Chasm
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 260 - 262.
[PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Gattellari, J. Worthington, N. Zwar, and S. Middleton
Barriers to the Use of Anticoagulation for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Representative Survey of Australian Family Physicians
Stroke, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 227 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
I. Payot, J. Latour, F. Massoud, and M.-J. Kergoat
Validation d'indicateurs de la prise en charge des atteintes des fonctions cognitives dans les unites d'evaluation geriatrique
Can Fam Physician, November 1, 2007; 53(11): 1944 - 1952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
B. Guthrie, M. Inkster, and T. Fahey
Tackling therapeutic inertia: role of treatment data in quality indicators
BMJ, September 15, 2007; 335(7619): 542 - 544.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
S. Ornstein, P. J. Nietert, R. G. Jenkins, A. M. Wessell, L. S. Nemeth, C. Feifer, and S. T. Corley
Improving Diabetes Care Through a Multicomponent Quality Improvement Model in a Practice-Based Research Network
American Journal of Medical Quality, January 1, 2007; 22(1): 34 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
C. Feifer, S. M. Ornstein, R. G. Jenkins, A. Wessell, S. T. Corley, L. S. Nemeth, L. Roylance, P. J. Nietert, and H. Liszka
The logic behind a multimethod intervention to improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines in a nationwide network of primary care practices.
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2006; 29(1): 65 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
L. A. Green and J. Hickner
A Short History of Primary Care Practice-based Research Networks: From Concept to Essential Research Laboratories
J Am Board Fam Med, January 1, 2006; 19(1): 1 - 10.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. A. Beck, H. Richard, J. V. Tu, and L. Pilote
Administrative Data Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment: AFFECT, A Cluster Randomized Trial
JAMA, July 20, 2005; 294(3): 309 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Abstract of this article
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients (PDF)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Ornstein, S.
space
  arrow  Litvin, C.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Physicians.