 |
 |
|
Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS
How Often Does Colonoscopy Fail To Detect Polyps?
7 September 2004 | Volume 141 Issue 5 | Page I-42
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.
The summary below is from the full report titled "Location of Adenomas Missed by Optical Colonoscopy." It is in the 7 September 2004 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 141, pages 352-359). The authors are P.J. Pickhardt, P.A. Nugent, P.A. Mysliwiec, J.R. Choi, and W.R. Schindler.
What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
Cancer of the large intestine or rectum is called colorectal cancer. It is the second leading cause of death from cancer in the United States. Polyps (outgrowths of the wall of the colon) precede most cases of colorectal cancer. Screening procedures can detect and remove polyps before they become cancerous and can also detect cancer early so that it may be cured with surgery. Doctors often use a long flexible tube with a tiny camera on its tip (optical colonoscopy or OC) to look for and remove polyps and early tumors. The OC procedure requires patient sedation and may miss some growths that are hidden behind folds in the colon. Doctors might also use a newer procedure called virtual colonoscopy (VC) to find polyps and early tumors. Virtual colonoscopy uses x-rays and computers to produce 3-dimensional images of the inside of the colon. It takes about 10 minutes and does not require sedation. Recently, researchers have used VC to study how often OC misses polyps.
Why did the researchers do this particular study?
To see how often OC misses colorectal polyps.
Who was studied?
1233 adults without any symptoms who participated in a colorectal cancer screening trial.
How was the study done?
Participants at 3 medical centers had same-day VC and OC procedures. Trained radiologists interpreted the VC images. Highly experienced doctors then performed OC. After examining a section of the colon, doctors were told the VC results. If VC identified a polyp that was not seen with OC, the doctors reexamined that section of the colon closely. The researchers then assessed how often the initial OC examination missed polyps that were seen at reexamination after the doctors knew the VC results. They specifically looked for "missed" polyps that were more likely to become cancerous (adenomas > 6 mm).
What did the researchers find?
Optical colonoscopy done without knowledge of VC findings missed 55 of 511 polyps. Optical colonoscopy missed 12% of the adenomas that measured 10 mm or larger. Twenty-one of these adenomas measured 6 mm or larger. Adenomas missed by OC were usually behind a fold or near the inside edge of the anus. Also, VC missed 14% of the adenomas that measured 6 mm or larger that were detected by OC.
What were the limitations of the study?
The doctors who did the procedures were very experienced, and the VC technology was sophisticated. Less experienced examiners and different VC techniques might miss more polyps.
What are the implications of the study?
Neither OC nor VC is a perfect test for detecting precancerous lesions in the colon, but these 2 examinations are complementary for detection. Each test misses 10% to 14% of adenomas that measure 6 mm or larger.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Levin, D. A. Lieberman, B. McFarland, R. A. Smith, D. Brooks, K. S. Andrews, C. Dash, F. M. Giardiello, S. Glick, T. R. Levin, et al. Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2008; 58(3): 130 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. J. Murff, N. B. Peterson, J. H. Fowke, M. Hargreaves, L. B. Signorello, R. S. Dittus, W. Zheng, and W. J. Blot Colonoscopy Screening in African Americans and Whites With Affected First-Degree Relatives Arch Intern Med, March 24, 2008; 168(6): 625 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Pickhardt, C. Hassan, A. Laghi, A. Zullo, D. H. Kim, F. Iafrate, and S. Morini Small and Diminutive Polyps Detected at Screening CT Colonography: A Decision Analysis for Referral to Colonoscopy Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 136 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Allison, L. C. Sakoda, T. R. Levin, J. P. Tucker, I. S. Tekawa, T. Cuff, M. P. Pauly, L. Shlager, A. M. Palitz, W. K. Zhao, et al. Screening for Colorectal Neoplasms With New Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Update on Performance Characteristics J Natl Cancer Inst, October 3, 2007; 99(19): 1462 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Pickhardt Screening CT Colonography: How I Do It Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 290 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. K. Choi, S. H. Park, D. Y. Kim, and H. K. Ha Malignant Rectal Polyp Overlooked on CT Colonography Because of Retention Balloon: Opposing Crescent Appearance as Sign of Compressed Polyp Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): W1 - W3. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Levi, P. Rozen, R. Hazazi, A. Vilkin, A. Waked, E. Maoz, S. Birkenfeld, M. Leshno, and Y. Niv A Quantitative Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Neoplasia Ann Intern Med, February 20, 2007; 146(4): 244 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. L. Barclay, J. J. Vicari, A. S. Doughty, J. F. Johanson, and R. L. Greenlaw Colonoscopic Withdrawal Times and Adenoma Detection during Screening Colonoscopy N. Engl. J. Med., December 14, 2006; 355(24): 2533 - 2541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Pickhardt, A. J. Taylor, D. H. Kim, M. Reichelderfer, D. V. Gopal, and P. R. Pfau Screening for Colorectal Neoplasia with CT Colonography: Initial Experience from the 1st Year of Coverage by Third-Party Payers Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 417 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Kung, M. S. Levine, S. N. Glick, P. Lakhani, S. E. Rubesin, and I. Laufer Colorectal Cancer: Screening Double-Contrast Barium Enema Examination in Average-Risk Adults Older Than 50 Years Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 725 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Singh, D. Turner, L. Xue, L. E. Targownik, and C. N. Bernstein Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA, May 24, 2006; 295(20): 2366 - 2373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. C. Taylor A 71-Year-Old Woman Contemplating a Screening Colonoscopy JAMA, March 8, 2006; 295(10): 1161 - 1167. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Iannaccone, C. Catalano, F. Mangiapane, T. Murakami, A. Lamazza, E. Fiori, A. Schillaci, D. Marin, I. Nofroni, M. Hori, et al. Colorectal Polyps: Detection with Low-Dose Multi-Detector Row Helical CT Colonography versus Two Sequential Colonoscopies Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 927 - 937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Macari and E. J. Bini CT Colonography: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 819 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Eisen and D. S. Weinberg Narrative Review: Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Patients with a First-Degree Relative with Colonic Neoplasia Ann Intern Med, August 2, 2005; 143(3): 190 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Pickhardt and J. R. Choi Adenomatous Polyp Obscured by Small-Caliber Rectal Catheter at Low-Dose CT Colonography: A Rare Diagnostic Pitfall Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1581 - 1583. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Pickhardt, R. B. Halberg, A. J. Taylor, B. Y. Durkee, J. Fine, F. T. Lee Jr., and J. P. Weichert Microcomputed tomography colonography for polyp detection in an in vivo mouse tumor model PNAS, March 1, 2005; 102(9): 3419 - 3422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Collins, D. A. Lieberman, T. E. Durbin, D. G. Weiss, and and the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #380 Gr Accuracy of Screening for Fecal Occult Blood on a Single Stool Sample Obtained by Digital Rectal Examination: A Comparison with Recommended Sampling Practice Ann Intern Med, January 18, 2005; 142(2): 81 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Hwang and R. K.H. Wong Limitations of Virtual Colonoscopy Ann Intern Med, January 18, 2005; 142(2): 154 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 JournalScan Gut, January 1, 2005; 54(1): 168 - 168. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Pickhardt Differential Diagnosis of Polypoid Lesions Seen at CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy) RadioGraphics, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 1535 - 1556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Miss Rate of Colonoscopy Using CT Colonography as the Reference Standard Journal Watch Gastroenterology, September 28, 2004; 2004(928): 2 - 2. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Gottlieb Routine colonoscopies miss more than 10% of polyps BMJ, September 25, 2004; 329(7468): 701 - 701. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Colonoscopy: What Is the Gold Standard? Journal Watch (General), September 24, 2004; 2004(924): 3 - 3. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Lieberman Colonoscopy: As Good as Gold? Ann Intern Med, September 7, 2004; 141(5): 401 - 403. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all Rapid Responses
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article
