 |
 |
|
Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS
Predicting Which Patients Have Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
7 September 2004 | Volume 141 Issue 5 | Page I-12
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.
The summary below is from the full report titled "A Clinical Prediction Rule for Diagnosing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in the Emergency Department." It is in the 7 September 2004 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 141, pages 333-342). The authors are G.M. Leung, T.H. Rainer, F.-L. Lau, I.O.L. Wong, A. Tong, T.-W. Wong, J.H.B. Kong, A.J. Hedley, and T.-H. Lam, for the Hospital Authority SARS Collaborative Group.
What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a serious, sometimes fatal, illness caused by a virus called a coronavirus. The illness was first described in Asia in 2003. It was discovered in Chinese patients who had fever and severe breathing problems. In the spring of 2003, SARS quickly spread among humans with close person-to-person contact. More than 8000 people in Asia, Europe, and North and South America developed SARS. Some areas, such as Hong Kong, set up emergency clinics to handle the large numbers of patients with the illness. Because SARS is a newly discovered illness, doctors do not always know how to distinguish it from other viral illnesses, such as influenza.
Why did the researchers do this particular study?
To find a practical way of identifying persons with low and high probabilities of having SARS.
Who was studied?
2649 patients seen at 2 Hong Kong triage clinics during the 2003 SARS epidemic.
How was the study done?
The researchers reviewed medical records of the patients who visited SARS triage clinics in the emergency departments of 2 Hong Kong hospitals in 2003. Specifically, they reviewed standard forms that had been used to record patients' presenting symptoms, physical findings, chest radiography results, and blood work results. The researchers also reviewed records to see which patients had blood test results that confirmed SARS. They analyzed these data to see which presenting features were associated with increased and decreased probabilities of finding SARS. Then, they used a risk index to score characteristics that helped identify or rule out SARS. Finally, they tested the ability of the risk index to correctly identify patients with SARS.
What did the researchers find?
Several features increased the likelihood of SARS: previous contact with a patient with SARS, fever, myalgia (muscle aches), malaise (feeling weak), abnormal chest radiograph, and abnormal lymphocyte and low platelet counts. Age older than 65 years or younger than 18 years, sputum production, abdominal pain, sore throat, runny nose, and high neutrophil count decreased the likelihood of SARS. The index that scored the presence or absence of these characteristics identified patients with low (<5%), high (20% to 40%), and very high (60% to 80%) probabilities of having SARS.
What were the limitations of the study?
Study data were obtained by reviewing medical records. Some patients may have had symptoms and findings that were not recorded in the records. Characteristics that identify patients with a high likelihood of SARS may be different in settings that are not large outbreaks.
What are the implications of the study?
A risk index that used data easily obtained in emergency departments identified patients with low and high likelihood of SARS during an outbreak.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. Sugioka, Y. Hayashino, S. Konno, S. Kikuchi, and S. Fukuhara Predictive value of self-reported patient information for the identification of lumbar spinal stenosis Fam. Pract., June 13, 2008; (2008) cmn031v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Lee, M. Ip, B. Wong, G. Lui, O. T. Y. Tsang, J. Y. Lai, K. W. Choi, R. Lam, T. K. Ng, J. Ho, et al. Risk Factors Associated with Life-threatening Rickettsial Infections Am J Trop Med Hyg, June 1, 2008; 78(6): 973 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. R. Hotchkiss, P. Holley, and P. S. Crooke Analyzing Pathogen Transmission in the Dialysis Unit: Time for a (Schedule) Change? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 2(6): 1176 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. R Utzman, D. L Riddle, and D. V Jewell Use of Demographic and Quantitative Admissions Data to Predict Academic Difficulty Among Professional Physical Therapist Students Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1164 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. R Utzman, D. L Riddle, and D. V Jewell Use of Demographic and Quantitative Admissions Data to Predict Performance on the National Physical Therapy Examination Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1181 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. J. Cowling, M. P. Muller, I. O. L. Wong, L.-M. Ho, S.-V. Lo, T. Tsang, T. H. Lam, M. Louie, and G. M. Leung Clinical prognostic rules for severe acute respiratory syndrome in low- and high-resource settings. Arch Intern Med, July 24, 2006; 166(14): 1505 - 1511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. H.M. Ma, S.-Y. Chen, W.-C. Chiang, C.-P. Su, and W.-J. Chen A Clinical Prediction Rule for the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Ann Intern Med, February 1, 2005; 142(3): 225 - 225. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Robbins A Clinical Prediction Rule was Useful in Determining Likelihood of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) During an Outbreak in Hong Kong AAP Grand Rounds, January 1, 2005; 13(1): 9 - 9. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Leung, A. J. Hedley, L.-M. Ho, P. Chau, I. O.L. Wong, T. Q. Thach, A. C. Ghani, C. A. Donnelly, C. Fraser, S. Riley, et al. The Epidemiology of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in the 2003 Hong Kong Epidemic: An Analysis of All 1755 Patients Ann Intern Med, November 2, 2004; 141(9): 662 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Diagnosing SARS in the ED Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, October 27, 2004; 2004(1027): 9 - 9. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Jernigan, R. F. Helfand, and U. D. Parashar Accurate Clinical Prediction of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Are We There Yet? Ann Intern Med, September 7, 2004; 141(5): 396 - 398. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all Rapid Responses
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article
