 |
 |
|
Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS
National Survey of Doctors' Beliefs about How Frequently Colonoscopy Should Be Done after Removal of a Colon Polyp
17 August 2004 | Volume 141 Issue 4 | Page I-22
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.
The summary below is from the full report titled "Are Physicians Doing Too Much Colonoscopy? A National Survey of Colorectal Surveillance after Polypectomy." It is in the 17 August 2004 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 141, pages 264-271). The authors are P.A. Mysliwiec, M.L. Brown, C.N. Klabunde, and D.F. Ransohoff.
What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
Most cancers of the colon begin as noncancerous (benign) polyps, which are growths on the inner surface of the tubelike large intestine. There are several different kinds of polyps, some of which may become cancerous growths and some of which rarely do. Doctors use a procedure known as colonoscopy (examination of the inside of the colon with a lighted tube) to check for polyps because removing a benign polyp prevents it from ever changing into a cancerous growth. After removing a benign polyp, doctors often repeat the colonoscopy periodically (surveillance colonoscopy) to ensure that no additional polyps have appeared. Several professional societies have written guidelines that advise doctors how often to repeat colonoscopy, depending on the chances that a particular kind of polyp is likely to recur and become cancerous. Because colonoscopy is expensive and requires a lot of physician time, it is important to tailor the frequency of surveillance colonoscopy to the likelihood that colon polyps will recur.
Why did the researchers do this particular study?
To determine whether gastroenterologists and general surgeons were following professional society guidelines on the frequency of surveillance colonoscopy.
Who was studied?
349 gastroenterologists and 317 general surgeons from all parts of the United States.
How was the study done?
Each study participant received a questionnaire in the mail that consisted of 40 questions about the doctor's beliefs, opinions, and practices concerning colon cancer screening. The questionnaire also presented 4 hypothetical patients with different kinds of colon polyps and asked doctors how often surveillance colonoscopy should be performed.
What did the researchers find?
Even when the initial colon polyp was a type for which professional society guidelines did not recommend surveillance colonoscopy, 25% of gastroenterologists and 56% of general surgeons would have performed the procedure and most would have done so every 5 years or more often. When a single polyp with relatively small risk for recurrence had been removed (professional societies recommend surveillance colonoscopy every 3 to 5 years in this instance), more than half of gastroenterologists and general surgeons would have performed the procedure within 3 years or sooner; one third of the general surgeons would never discontinue surveillance. In the case of large or multiple initial polyps (most professional societies recommend surveillance colonoscopy every 3 to 5 years), almost one half of gastroenterologists and 80% of general surgeons recommended having the procedure more often than once every 3 years.
What were the limitations of the study?
The results of the survey were based on what the doctors said they would do rather than what they may actually have done in practice.
What are the implications of the study?
It seems that doctors are greatly overusing surveillance colonoscopy, a finding that, if true, has serious adverse financial and manpower implications for the health system of the United States.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Levin, D. A. Lieberman, B. McFarland, R. A. Smith, D. Brooks, K. S. Andrews, C. Dash, F. M. Giardiello, S. Glick, T. R. Levin, et al. Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2008; 58(3): 130 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and O. W. Brawley Cancer Screening in the United States, 2008: A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Cancer Screening Issues CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2008; 58(3): 161 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. O. Laiyemo, G. Murphy, P. S. Albert, L. B. Sansbury, Z. Wang, A. J. Cross, P. M. Marcus, B. Caan, J. R. Marshall, P. Lance, et al. Postpolypectomy Colonoscopy Surveillance Guidelines: Predictive Accuracy for Advanced Adenoma at 4 Years Ann Intern Med, March 18, 2008; 148(6): 419 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. F. Imperiale and H. C. Sox Guidelines for Surveillance Intervals after Polypectomy: Coping with the Evidence Ann Intern Med, March 18, 2008; 148(6): 477 - 479. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. A Kuehle, J. Langhorst, S. C Ladd, T. Zoepf, M. Nuefer, F. Grabellus, J. Barkhausen, G. Gerken, and T. C Lauenstein Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population Gut, August 1, 2007; 56(8): 1079 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and H. J. Eyre Cancer Screening in the United States, 2007: A Review of Current Guidelines, Practices, and Prospects CA Cancer J Clin, March 1, 2007; 57(2): 90 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. B. Burns and T. Delbanco Frequency of Surveillance for Barrett Esophagus--Reply JAMA, February 21, 2007; 297(7): 699 - 700. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. S. Levine and D. J. Ahnen Adenomatous Polyps of the Colon N. Engl. J. Med., December 14, 2006; 355(24): 2551 - 2557. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Lieberman A Call to Action -- Measuring the Quality of Colonoscopy N. Engl. J. Med., December 14, 2006; 355(24): 2588 - 2589. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. K. Roy, V. Backman, and M. J. Goldberg Colon cancer screening: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Arch Intern Med, November 13, 2006; 166(20): 2177 - 2179. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Boolchand, G. Olds, J. Singh, P. Singh, A. Chak, and G. S. Cooper Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians. Ann Intern Med, November 7, 2006; 145(9): 654 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. V. Tyler Jr. and C. W. Snyder Cancer Risk Assessment: Examining the Family Physician's Role J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2006; 19(5): 468 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Winawer, A. G. Zauber, R. H. Fletcher, J. S. Stillman, M. J. O'Brien, B. Levin, R. A. Smith, D. A. Lieberman, R. W. Burt, T. R. Levin, et al. Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance after Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2006; 56(3): 143 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Eisen and D. S. Weinberg Narrative Review: Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Patients with a First-Degree Relative with Colonic Neoplasia Ann Intern Med, August 2, 2005; 143(3): 190 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. T. Ferrucci Colonoscopy: Virtual and Optical--Another Look, Another View Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 13 - 16. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and H. J. Eyre American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2005 CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2005; 55(1): 31 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
JournalScan Gut, December 1, 2004; 53(12): 1876 - 1876. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Minerva BMJ, October 16, 2004; 329(7471): 926 - 926. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Overuse of Surveillance Colonoscopy After Polypectomy Journal Watch Gastroenterology, September 15, 2004; 2004(915): 1 - 1. [Full Text]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article
