 |
 |
|
Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS
Identifying Patients with Low Back Pain Who Are Likely To Benefit from Spinal Manipulation
21 December 2004 | Volume 141 Issue 12 | Page I-39
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.
The summary below is from the full report titled "A Clinical Prediction Rule To Identify Patients with Low Back Pain Most Likely To Benefit from Spinal Manipulation: A Validation Study." It is in the 21 December 2004 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 141, pages 920-928). The authors are J.D. Childs, J.M. Fritz, T.W. Flynn, J.J. Irrgang, K.K. Johnson, G.R. Majkowski, and A. Delitto.
What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
Low back pain is a common problem. Traditional treatments that are helpful for some patients with low back pain include drugs (pain killers, anti-inflammatory drugs, and muscle relaxants), physical therapy, and back exercises. Treatments that are not helpful include traction, bed rest, corsets, topical gels, heat therapy, and certain types of massage. Spinal manipulation is an alternative treatment for low back pain. For spinal manipulation, a specially trained person (chiropractor, physician, or physical therapist) uses his or her hands to move the bones in the spine. Experts disagree about the role of spinal manipulation in treating low back pain. Spinal manipulation may be more likely to help certain types of patients with back pain than others. A previous study developed a rule based on 5 characteristics of patients with low back pain who achieved benefit from spinal manipulation. In that study, patients who met at least 4 of the 5 characteristics were most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation. However, this rule has not been tested in other patients.
Why did the researchers do this particular study?
To see whether the rule identified patients whose back pain improved with spinal manipulation.
Who was studied?
Adults with low back pain referred for physical therapy. Patients who were pregnant, had previous back surgery, or had signs of nerve damage or a serious problem (such as tumor or infection) were not included.
How was the study done?
The researchers assigned patients to receive physical therapy with back exercises alone or physical therapy with 2 sessions of spinal manipulation and back exercises. They then evaluated patients' symptoms at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 6 months after treatment. The researchers also determined whether each patient met at least 4 of the 5 factors in the rule. The 5 factors were duration of current episode of low back pain less than 16 days, having no symptoms below the knees, having a score less than 19 on a questionnaire about beliefs about pain, having at least 1 abnormally moving segment of the spine on physical examination, and having adequate motion in 1 hip or both hips.
What did the researchers find?
Patients who received physical therapy with 2 sessions of spinal manipulation and back exercises improved more than patients who received back exercises alone at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 6 months. Among the 70 patients who received spinal manipulation, the 23 patients who met the rule were more than twice as likely as the 47 patients who did not meet the rule to show improvement.
What were the limitations of the study?
Of the 131 patients enrolled in the study, 39 did not complete the 6-month follow-up. This study does not test the feasibility of doctors' applying the rule in their own offices.
What are the implications of the study?
Doctors can use this rule to identify patients with low back pain who are likely to benefit from spinal manipulation.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Badgett Adjunctive diclofenac and spinal manipulation did not speed recovery of acute low back pain Evid. Based Med., June 1, 2008; 13(3): 75 - 75. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. J. Sweetman Comment on: Do baseline characteristics predict response to treatment for low back pain? Secondary analysis of the UK BEAM dataset Rheumatology, February 1, 2008; 47(2): 231 - 231. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Landel, K. Kulig, M. Fredericson, B. Li, and C. M Powers Intertester Reliability and Validity of Motion Assessments During Lumbar Spine Accessory Motion Testing Physical Therapy, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A Browder, J. D Childs, J. A Cleland, and J. M Fritz Effectiveness of an Extension-Oriented Treatment Approach in a Subgroup of Subjects With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial Physical Therapy, December 1, 2007; 87(12): 1608 - 1618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Chou, A. Qaseem, V. Snow, D. Casey, J. T. Cross Jr, P. Shekelle, D. K. Owens, and for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society Ann Intern Med, October 2, 2007; 147(7): 478 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Chou and L. H. Huffman Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline Ann Intern Med, October 2, 2007; 147(7): 492 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. L Currier, P. J Froehlich, S. D Carow, R. K McAndrew, A. V Cliborne, R. E Boyles, L. T Mansfield, and R. S Wainner Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients With Knee Pain and Clinical Evidence of Knee Osteoarthritis Who Demonstrate a Favorable Short-Term Response to Hip Mobilization Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1106 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. R. Underwood, V. Morton, A. Farrin, and on behalf of the UK BEAM trial team Do baseline characteristics predict response to treatment for low back pain? Secondary analysis of the UK BEAM dataset [ISRCTN32683578] Rheumatology, August 1, 2007; 46(8): 1297 - 1302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M Fritz and G. P Brennan Preliminary Examination of a Proposed Treatment-Based Classification System for Patients Receiving Physical Therapy Interventions for Neck Pain Physical Therapy, May 1, 2007; 87(5): 513 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A Cleland, P. Glynn, J. M Whitman, S. L Eberhart, C. MacDonald, and J. D Childs Short-Term Effects of Thrust Versus Nonthrust Mobilization/Manipulation Directed at the Thoracic Spine in Patients With Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial Physical Therapy, April 1, 2007; 87(4): 431 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S Teyhen, T. W Flynn, J. D Childs, and L. D Abraham Arthrokinematics in a Subgroup of Patients Likely to Benefit From a Lumbar Stabilization Exercise Program Physical Therapy, March 1, 2007; 87(3): 313 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A Cleland, J. D Childs, J. M Fritz, J. M Whitman, and S. L Eberhart Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Guiding Treatment of a Subgroup of Patients With Neck Pain: Use of Thoracic Spine Manipulation, Exercise, and Patient Education Physical Therapy, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 9 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. H. Bridwell, P. A. Anderson, S. D. Boden, A. R. Vaccaro, and J. C. Wang What's New in Spine Surgery J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2006; 88(8): 1897 - 1907. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W McClure, L. A Michener, and A. R Karduna Shoulder Function and 3-Dimensional Scapular Kinematics in People With and Without Shoulder Impingement Syndrome Physical Therapy, August 1, 2006; 86(8): 1075 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J Irrgang Invited Commentary Physical Therapy, July 1, 2006; 86(7): 1033 - 1037. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B W Koes, M W van Tulder, and S Thomas Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. BMJ, June 17, 2006; 332(7555): 1430 - 1434. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Maher, J. D Childs, and J. A Cleland Clinical Prediction Rules Physical Therapy, May 1, 2006; 86(5): 759 - 760. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D Childs and J. A Cleland Development and Application of Clinical Prediction Rules to Improve Decision Making in Physical Therapist Practice Physical Therapy, January 1, 2006; 86(1): 122 - 131. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L Craik Never Satisfied Physical Therapy, November 1, 2005; 85(11): 1224 - 1237. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Underwood A clinical prediction rule predicted outcome in patients with low back pain having spinal manipulation and exercise treatment Evid. Based Med., August 1, 2005; 10(4): 125 - 125. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Evidence based journal watch Br. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2005; 39(7): 469 - 470. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Childs, J. M. Fritz, and T. W. Flynn Treatments for Back Pain Ann Intern Med, May 17, 2005; 142(10): 874 - 874. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Delitto Research in Low Back Pain: Time to Stop Seeking the Elusive "Magic Bullet" Physical Therapy, March 1, 2005; 85(3): 206 - 208. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Deyo Treatments for Back Pain: Can We Get Past Trivial Effects? Ann Intern Med, December 21, 2004; 141(12): 957 - 958. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all Rapid Responses
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article
