 |
 |
|
Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
Audio/Video |
CME |
Collections |
In the Clinic |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS
The Effectiveness of Spinal Manipulation Relative to Other Therapies for Low Back Pain
3 June 2003 | Volume 138 Issue 11 | Page I-33
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.
The summary below is from the full report titled "Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Low Back Pain. A Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness Relative to Other Therapies." It is in the 3 June 2003 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 138, pages 871-881). The authors are W.J.J. Assendelft, S.C. Morton, E.I. Yu, M.J. Suttorp, and P.G. Shekelle.
What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
Low back pain is a common problem that often goes away after several days or weeks, but in some persons may persist for months or years. The main goal in treating low back pain is to decrease pain and allow patients to resume their normal activities. Some doctors and researchers assume that various traditional treatments are helpful for low back pain; these include drugs (pain killers, anti-inflammatory drugs, and muscle relaxants), physical therapy, back exercises, and education about ways to prevent back injury and to deal with back pain (sometimes called back school). Some treatments have been shown to be unhelpful; they include traction, bed rest, corsets, topical gels, heat therapy, and certain types of massage. Spinal manipulation is an alternative treatment for low back pain. For spinal manipulation, a specially trained person (chiropractor, osteopathic physician, or physical therapist) uses his or her hands to move the bones in the spine. Some guidelines for the treatment of low back pain recommend spinal manipulation, while others do not. One of the reasons experts disagree about the role of spinal manipulation in the treatment of low back pain is that some have compared it to a mix of traditional therapies rather than to each therapy individually.
Why did the researchers do this particular study?
To compare spinal manipulation to other individual therapies for low back pain.
Who was studied?
Rather than do a new study, the authors looked at published studies. Patients included in these previous studies were the focus of this work.
How was the study done?
The researchers searched the medical literature by using computerized databases to find studies that compared spinal manipulation to one of seven categories of other treatments for low back pain: general practitioner care, pain killers, physical therapy, exercises, back school, a collection of ineffective therapies (for example, traction, bed rest, and heat therapy), or sham manipulation. Sham manipulation meant that the patients thought they were getting spinal manipulation but were not. The therapists just touched their backs without performing the specific movements involved in real spinal manipulation. The researchers found 39 studies that met these criteria and collected information about each study and its results. Then they used a method called meta-analysis to combine the results of studies that looked at the same category of treatment and calculated the effectiveness of spinal manipulation compared with that treatment.
What did the researchers find?
Spinal manipulation was more effective than sham therapy and therapies already known to be unhelpful. However, it was no more or less effective than general practitioner care, pain killers, physical therapy, exercise, or back school.
What were the limitations of the study?
The effectiveness of spinal manipulation compared with other therapies may change as new studies are done and new drugs or new spinal manipulation techniques are developed. In addition, many patients with low back pain receive several types of treatment at once.
What are the implications of the study?
This analysis suggests that spinal manipulation is no more or no less effective than traditional therapies for low back pain.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Chou, A. Qaseem, V. Snow, D. Casey, J. T. Cross Jr, P. Shekelle, D. K. Owens, and for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society Ann Intern Med, October 2, 2007; 147(7): 478 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Chou and L. H. Huffman Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline Ann Intern Med, October 2, 2007; 147(7): 492 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. E Wilde, J. J Ford, and J. M McMeeken Indicators of Lumbar Zygapophyseal Joint Pain: Survey of an Expert Panel With the Delphi Technique Physical Therapy, October 1, 2007; 87(10): 1348 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. White, N. E. Foster, M. Cummings, and P. Barlas Acupuncture treatment for chronic knee pain: a systematic review Rheumatology, March 1, 2007; 46(3): 384 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. H. Shen, D. Samartzis, and G. B.J. Andersson Nonsurgical Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2006; 14(8): 477 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Moffett and S. McLean The role of physiotherapy in the management of non-specific back pain and neck pain Rheumatology, April 1, 2006; 45(4): 371 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. K Freburger, T. S Carey, and G. M Holmes Effectiveness of Physical Therapy for the Management of Chronic Spine Disorders: A Propensity Score Approach Physical Therapy, March 1, 2006; 86(3): 381 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. V Jewell and D. L Riddle Interventions That Increase or Decrease the Likelihood of a Meaningful Improvement in Physical Health in Patients With Sciatica Physical Therapy, November 1, 2005; 85(11): 1139 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Mikhail, N. Korner-Bitensky, M. Rossignol, and J.-P. Dumas Physical Therapists' Use of Interventions With High Evidence of Effectiveness in the Management of a Hypothetical Typical Patient With Acute Low Back Pain Physical Therapy, November 1, 2005; 85(11): 1151 - 1167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. L. Kuchera Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine Considerations in Patients With Chronic Pain J Am Osteopath Assoc, September 1, 2005; 105(suppl_4): S29 - S36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. G. Shekelle, S. C. Morton, M. J. Suttorp, N. Buscemi, and C. Friesen Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Topics Ann Intern Med, June 21, 2005; 142(12_Part_2): 1042 - 1047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. P. Legorreta Medical Costs Associated With Chiropractic Care--Reply Arch Intern Med, June 13, 2005; 165(11): 1314 - 1314. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Childs, J. M. Fritz, and T. W. Flynn Treatments for Back Pain Ann Intern Med, May 17, 2005; 142(10): 874 - 874. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. J. Carragee Persistent Low Back Pain N. Engl. J. Med., May 5, 2005; 352(18): 1891 - 1898. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Manheimer, A. White, B. Berman, K. Forys, and E. Ernst Meta-Analysis: Acupuncture for Low Back Pain Ann Intern Med, April 19, 2005; 142(8): 651 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G E Bekkering, H J M Hendriks, M W van Tulder, D L Knol, M Hoeijenbos, R A B Oostendorp, and L M Bouter Effect on the process of care of an active strategy to implement clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2005; 14(2): 107 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Samuels Update in Neurology Ann Intern Med, January 4, 2005; 142(1): 28 - 36. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Childs, J. M. Fritz, T. W. Flynn, J. J. Irrgang, K. K. Johnson, G. R. Majkowski, and A. Delitto A Clinical Prediction Rule To Identify Patients with Low Back Pain Most Likely To Benefit from Spinal Manipulation: A Validation Study Ann Intern Med, December 21, 2004; 141(12): 920 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Deyo Treatments for Back Pain: Can We Get Past Trivial Effects? Ann Intern Med, December 21, 2004; 141(12): 957 - 958. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 UK BEAM Trial Team United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care BMJ, December 11, 2004; 329(7479): 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Licciardone The Unique Role of Osteopathic Physicians in Treating Patients With Low Back Pain J Am Osteopath Assoc, November 1, 2004; 104(11_suppl): 13S - 18S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M M Sran To treat or not to treat: new evidence for the effectiveness of manual therapy Br. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2004; 38(5): 521 - 525. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. W. Sherman and H. Strang Experimental Ethnography: The Marriage of Qualitative and Quantitative Research The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, September 1, 2004; 595(1): 204 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Childs and T. W. Flynn Spinal Manipulation for Low Back Pain Ann Intern Med, April 20, 2004; 140(8): 665 - 665. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Shapiro Spinal Manipulation for Low Back Pain Ann Intern Med, April 20, 2004; 140(8): 665 - 665. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. W. Sherman and H. Strang Verdicts or Inventions?: Interpreting Results from Randomized Controlled Experiments in Criminology American Behavioral Scientist, January 1, 2004; 47(5): 575 - 607. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (25 Apr 2003 to 18 Jul 2003) Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2003; 6(4): e1 - 12. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 How Effective Are Alternative Therapies for Back Pain? Journal Watch Neurology, September 5, 2003; 2003(905): 9 - 9. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. W. Sherman Misleading Evidence and Evidence-Led Policy: Making Social Science more Experimental The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, September 1, 2003; 589(1): 6 - 19. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Massage, Acupuncture, or Manipulation for Low Back Pain? Journal Watch (General), June 20, 2003; 2003(620): 3 - 3. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. C. Cherkin, K. J. Sherman, R. A. Deyo, and P. G. Shekelle A Review of the Evidence for the Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost of Acupuncture, Massage Therapy, and Spinal Manipulation for Back Pain Ann Intern Med, June 3, 2003; 138(11): 898 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article
