 |
 |
|
|
|  PubMed
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 March 2007 | Volume 146 Issue 6 | Pages 454-458
This guideline summarizes the current approaches for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. The importance of early diagnosis to prevent mortality and morbidity associated with venous thromboembolism cannot be overstressed. This field is highly dynamic, however, and new evidence is emerging periodically that may change the recommendations. The purpose of this guideline is to present recommendations based on current evidence to clinicians to aid in the diagnosis of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
*This guideline was originally published in the Annals of Family Medicine on 1 January 2007. Readers who wish to cite this article should use the following citation: Qaseem A, Snow V, Barry P, Hornbake ER, Rodnick JE, Tobolic T, et al. Current diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in primary care: A clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:57-62.
Good-quality evidence supports the use of clinical prediction rules to establish pretest probability of disease. The Wells prediction rules for DVT and for pulmonary embolism (Tables 1 and 2) have been validated >and are frequently used to estimate the probability of VTE before performing more definitive testing on patients. The Wells prediction rule performs better in younger patients without comorbidities or a history of VTE than it does in other patients. Physicians should use their clinical judgment in cases where a patient is older or presents with comorbidities. CLINICAL GUIDELINES
Current Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism in Primary Care: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians*
Clinical Efficacy and Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians: Douglas K. Owens, MD, MS (Chair); Mark Aronson, MD; Donald E. Casey Jr., MD, MPH, MBA; J. Thomas Cross Jr., MD, MPH; Nancy C. Dolan, MD; Nick Fitterman, MD; E. Rodney Hornbake, MD; Paul Shekelle, MD, PhD; Katherine D. Sherif, MD; and Kevin Weiss, MD, MPH (Immediate Past Chair). Commission on Science of the American Academy of Family Physicians: Eric M. Wall, MD, MPH (Chair); Kevin A. Peterson, MD, MPH; James M. Gill, MD; Robert C. Marshall, MD, MPH; Jonathan E. Rodnick, MD; Kenneth G. Schellhase, MD, MPH; Steven W. Strode, MD, MEd, MPH; Kurtis S. Elward, MD, MPH; James W. Mold, MD, MPH; Jonathan L. Temte, MD, PhD; Frederick M. Chen, MD, MPH; Thomas F. Koinis, MD; Donya A. Powers, MD; Karl M. Kochendorfer, MD; Peter John Oppelt; Herbert F. Young, MD, MA; and Bellinda K. Schoof, MHA. Approved by the American College of Physicians Board of Regents on 4 April 2006. Approved by the American Academy of Family Physicians Board of Directors on 28 March 2006.
Recommendations
Top
Recommendations
Methods
Summary
Author & Article Info
References
Recommendation 1: Validated clinical prediction rules should be used to estimate pretest probability of venous thromboembolism (VTE), both deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, and for the basis of interpretation of subsequent tests.
|
|
Recommendation 2: In appropriately selected patients with low pretest probability of DVT or pulmonary emobolism, obtaining a high-sensitivity D-dimer is a reasonable option, and if negative indicates a low likelihood of VTE.
In selected patients who have a low pretest probability of VTE as defined by the Well prediction rules, a negative high-sensitivity D-dimer assay for VTE has sufficiently high predictive value to reduce the need for further imaging studies. Currently, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), quantitative rapid ELISA, and advanced turbidimetric D-dimer determinations are highly sensitive assays (sensitivity 96% to 100%), and their use is practical in diagnosis of VTE. D-dimer testing has the highest negative predictive value when used to exclude VTE in younger patients without associated comorbidity or history of VTE and with short duration of symptoms, because the Wells criteria more accurately predict a low pretest probability of VTE in such patients. In older patients, those with associated comorbidity, and long duration of symptoms, a D-dimer alone may not be sufficient to rule out VTE.
Recommendation 3: Ultrasound is recommended for patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of DVT in the lower extremities.
Use of ultrasound in diagnosing symptomatic thrombosis in the proximal vein of the lower limb is recommended for patients whose pretest probability of disease falls in the category of intermediate to high risk for DVT under the Wells prediction rule. Ultrasound is less sensitive in patients who have DVT limited to the calf; therefore, a negative ultrasound does not rule out DVT in these patients. Repeat ultrasound or venography may be required for patients who have suspected calf-vein DVT and a negative ultrasound and for patients who have suspected proximal DVT and an ultrasound that is technically inadequate or equivocal. Contrast venography is still considered the definitive test to rule out the diagnosis of DVT.
Recommendation 4: Patients with intermediate or high pretest probability of pulmonary emobolism require diagnostic imaging studies.
For patients who have intermediate or high pretest probability of pulmonary embolism, imaging is essential. Possible tests include ventilation–perfusion (V/Q) scan, multidetector helical computer axial tomography (CT), and pulmonary angiography. Recent systematic reviews indicate that CT alone may not be sufficiently sensitive to exclude pulmonary embolism in patients who have a high pretest probability of pulmonary embolism.
Background
|
|---|
This guideline aims to present evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of lower extremity DVT and pulmonary embolism. The target audience for this guideline is all primary care physicians. The target patient population is all adults who have a probability of developing DVT or pulmonary embolism, including pregnant individuals.
Methods
|
|---|
|
TopRecommendationsMethodsSummaryAuthor & Article InfoReferences |
|---|
This guideline's recommendations are based on the EPC review, which addressed the following questions on diagnosis formulated by the AAFP and ACP:
1. Are clinical prediction rules valuable for diagnosing DVT or pulmonary embolism, and does addition of the D-dimer assay improve the test characteristics of clinical prediction rules?
2. What are the test characteristics of D-dimer measurement alone when used for diagnosis or exclusion of lower extremity DVT or pulmonary embolism, and how does choice of assay affect the test characteristics?
3. What are the test characteristics of ultrasonography for diagnosis of DVT, including calf vein DVT?
4. What are the test characteristics of computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism?
Clinical Prediction Rules Alone and in Combination with D-Dimer Assay for Diagnosis of VTE
|
|---|
Eleven studies combined the Wells prediction rule with a D-dimer assay (9, 14,15, 17–19, 22, 23, 26, 27, 29). A systematic review concluded that patients with a low pretest probability and a negative D-dimer test had a 3-month incidence of DVT of 0.5%, whereas those with a negative D-dimer test and moderate or high pretest probability had incidences of 3.5% and 21.4%, respectively (30). A recent study of the Wells rule in primary care raised doubts about its negative predictive value, but the study included patients with recurrent DVT, and its implications are not yet clear (31).
In summary, the evidence supports the use of a clinical prediction rule for establishing pretest probability of VTE. Combination of a D-dimer assay with a clinical prediction rule provides sufficient negative predictive value to reduce the need for further imaging studies in appropriately selected patients with low pretest probability of disease.
Test Characteristics of D-Dimer Assays Alone for Diagnosis of VTE
|
|---|
In summary, the evidence suggests that a negative highly sensitive D-dimer test can help exclude the diagnosis of proximal DVT and pulmonary embolism in relatively healthy younger patients with short duration of symptoms who have a low pretest probability of VTE. There is variation in the sensitivity of D-dimer assays, however, and clinicians should be informed about the type of D-dimer assay used in their clinical setting relative to the population being tested and type of assay being used.
Test Characteristics of Ultrasonography for Diagnosis of DVT
|
|---|
Hence, ultrasonography has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing proximal DVT of the lower extremity in symptomatic patients. Though specificity is maintained, sensitivity is diminished in patients who are asymptomatic or who have DVT in the calf.
Test Characteristics of Helical CT for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism
|
|---|
Interpretation of this evidence is controversial because of such factors as substantial referral bias associated with the published evidence. More important, the literature has lagged behind rapid recent advances in CT technology. The authors of the EPC report estimate that for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, helical CT has at best a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 95% compared with conventional pulmonary arteriography. Data published after the EPC review was completed suggested that current-generation multidetector CT technology may offer significantly higher sensitivity and similar specificity to the technology assessed in the EPC review (43). Even so, 2 recent systematic reviews conclude that helical CT alone may not be sufficiently sensitive to exclude pulmonary embolism in patients who have relatively high pretest probability (44, 45). Further imaging studies are likely needed in patients who have a high pretest probability of pulmonary embolism and a negative CT scan; options include single or sequential ultrasound assessment of the lower extremities or pulmonary angiography.
Summary
|
|---|
|
TopRecommendationsMethodsSummaryAuthor & Article InfoReferences |
|---|
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
|
TopRecommendationsMethodsSummaryAuthor & Article InfoReferences |
|---|
Disclaimer: No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Note: Clinical guidelines are "guides" only and may not apply to all patients and all clinical situations. Thus, they are not intended to override clinicians' judgment. All American College of Physicians clinical practice guidelines are considered automatically withdrawn or invalid 5 years after publication or once an update has been issued.
Grant Support: The American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians operating budgets.
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.
Request for Single Reprints: Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, American College of Physicians, 190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106.
References
|
|---|
|
TopRecommendationsMethodsSummaryAuthor & Article InfoReferences |
|---|
1. Anderson FA Jr, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, Hosmer DW, Patwardhan NA, Jovanovic B, et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:933-8. [PMID: 2025141].
2. Barritt DW, Jordan SC. Anticoagulant drugs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism. A controlled trial. Lancet. 1960;1:1309-12. [PMID: 13797091].[Medline]
3. Segal J, Eng J, Jenckes M. Diagnosis and Treatment of Deep VenousThrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. Evidence Report/TechnologyAssessment. Rockville, MD: Prepared by the Johns HopkinsEvidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-97-0007;2003. Publication No. 03-E016.
4. Segal JB, Eng J, Tamariz LJ, Bass EB. Review of the evidence on diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:63-73. [PMID: 17261866].
5. Segal JB, Streiff MB, Hoffman LV, Thornton K, Bass EB. Management of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review for a practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:211-22. [PMID: 17261856].
6. American College of Physicians. Management of venous thromboembolism: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:204-10. [PMID: 17261857].
7. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Gray L, et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet. 1997;350:1795-8. [PMID: 9428249].[Medline]
8. Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D, Roy PM, Gourdier AL, Cornuz J, et al. Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 2002;113:269-75. [PMID: 12361811].[Medline]
9. Cornuz J, Ghali WA, Hayoz D, Stoianov R, Depairon M, Yersin B. Clinical prediction of deep venous thrombosis using two risk assessment methods in combination with rapid quantitative d-dimer testing. Am J Med. 2002;112:198-203. [PMID: 11893346].[Medline]
10. Anderson DR, Wells PS, Stiell I, MacLeod B, Simms M, Gray L, et al. Thrombosis in the emergency department: use of a clinical diagnosis model to safely avoid the need for urgent radiological investigation. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:477-82. [PMID: 10074956].
11. Kraaijenhagen RA, Piovella F, Bernardi E, Verlato F, Beckers EA, Koopman MM, et al. Simplification of the diagnostic management of suspected deep vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:907-11. [PMID: 11966342].
12. Wells PS, Lensing AW, Davidson BL, Prins MH, Hirsh J. Accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients after orthopedic surgery. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:47-53. [PMID: 7985896].
13. Dryjski M, O'Brien-Irr MS, Harris LM, Hassett J, Janicke D. Evaluation of a screening protocol to exclude the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis among emergency department patients. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:1010-5. [PMID: 11743553].[Medline]
14. Anderson DR, Wells PS, Stiell I, MacLeod B, Simms M, Gray L, et al. Management of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis in the emergency department: combining use of a clinical diagnosis model with d-dimer testing. J Emerg Med. 2000;19:225-30. [PMID: 11033266].[Medline]
15. Fünfsinn N, Caliezi C, Biasiutti FD, Korte W, Z'Brun A, Baumgartner I, et al. Rapid d-dimer testing and pre-test clinical probability in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2001;12:165-70. [PMID: 11414629].[Medline]
16. Constans J, Nelzy ML, Salmi LR, Skopinski S, Saby JC, Le Métayer P, et al. Clinical prediction of lower limb deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic hospitalized patients. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:985-90. [PMID: 11686356].[Medline]
17. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Douketis J, Crowther M, Brill-Edwards P, Weitz JI, et al. Management of suspected deep venous thrombosis in outpatients by using clinical assessment and d-dimer testing. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:108-11. [PMID: 11453710].
18. Aschwanden M, Labs KH, Jeanneret C, Gehrig A, Jaeger KA. The value of rapid d-dimer testing combined with structured clinical evaluation for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:929-35. [PMID: 10550192].[Medline]
19. Schutgens RE, Ackermark P, Haas FJ, Nieuwenhuis HK, Peltenburg HG, Pijlman AH, et al. Combination of a normal d-dimer concentration and a non-high pretest clinical probability score is a safe strategy to exclude deep venous thrombosis. Circulation. 2003;107:593-7. [PMID: 12566372].
20. Shields GP, Turnipseed S, Panacek EA, Melnikoff N, Gosselin R, White RH. Validation of the Canadian clinical probability model for acute venous thrombosis. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:561-6. [PMID: 12045068].[Medline]
21. Tick LW, Ton E, van Voorthuizen T, Hovens MM, Leeuwenburgh I, Lobatto S, et al. Practical diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis by clinical probability test, compression ultrasonography, and d-dimer test. Am J Med. 2002;113:630-5. [PMID: 12505112].[Medline]
22. Ruiz-Giménez N, Friera A, Artieda P, Caballero P, Sanchez Moliní P, Morales M, et al. Rapid d-dimer test combined a clinical model for deep vein thrombosis. Validation with ultrasonography and clinical follow-up in 383 patients. Thromb Haemost. 2004;91:1237-46. [PMID: 15175813].[Medline]
23. Ilkhanipour K, Wolfson AB, Walker H, Cillo J, Rolniak S, Cockley P, et al. Combining clinical risk with d-dimer testing to rule out deep vein thrombosis. J Emerg Med. 2004;27:233-9. [PMID: 15388207].[Medline]
24. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Gray L, et al. Application of a diagnostic clinical model for the management of hospitalized patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 1999;81:493-7. [PMID: 10235426].[Medline]
25. Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:997-1005. [PMID: 9867786].
26. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED d-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83:416-20. [PMID: 10744147].[Medline]
27. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Stiell I, Dreyer JF, Barnes D, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:98-107. [PMID: 11453709].
28. Goodacre S, Sutton AJ, Sampson FC. Meta-analysis: The value of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:129-39. [PMID: 16027455].
29. Lennox AF, Delis KT, Serunkuma S, Zarka ZA, Daskalopoulou SE, Nicolaides AN. Combination of a clinical risk assessment score and rapid whole blood d-dimer testing in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic patients. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:794-803. [PMID: 10550176].[Medline]
30. Fancher TL, White RH, Kravitz RL. Combined use of rapid d-dimer testing and estimation of clinical probability in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: systematic review. BMJ. 2004;329:821 [PMID: 15383452].
31. Oudega R, Hoes AW, Moons KG. The Wells rule does not adequately rule out deep venous thrombosis in primary care patients. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:100-7. [PMID: 16027451].
32. Brown MD, Lau J, Nelson RD, Kline JA. Turbidimetric d-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a metaanalysis. Clin Chem. 2003;49:1846-53. [PMID: 14578316].
33. Brown MD, Rowe BH, Reeves MJ, Bermingham JM, Goldhaber SZ. The accuracy of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay d-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40:133-44. [PMID: 12140491].[Medline]
34. Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, Olson RE, Ghali WA, Brant R, et al. d-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:589-602. [PMID: 15096330].
35. White RH, McGahan JP, Daschbach MM, Hartling RP. Diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis using duplex ultrasound. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:297-304. [PMID: 2667418].
36. Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Abbitt PL. Real-time ultrasonography for the diagnosis of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. The wave of the future? Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1731-4. [PMID: 2669660].
37. Cogo A, Lensing AW, Wells P, Prandoni P, Büller HR. Noninvasive objective tests for the diagnosis of clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Haemostasis. 1995;25:27-39. [PMID: 7896220].[Medline]
38. Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE, Ginsberg JS. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. McMaster Diagnostic Imaging Practice Guidelines Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:663-77. [PMID: 9537941].
39. Gottlieb RH, Widjaja J, Tian L, Rubens DJ, Voci SL. Calf sonography for detecting deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic patients: experience and review of the literature. J Clin Ultrasound. 1999;27:415-20. [PMID: 10477882].[Medline]
40. Mustafa BO, Rathbun SW, Whitsett TL, Raskob GE. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:401-4. [PMID: 11863471].
41. Kassaï B, Boissel JP, Cucherat M, Sonie S, Shah NR, Leizorovicz A. A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients. Thromb Haemost. 2004;91:655-66. [PMID: 15045125].[Medline]
42. Rathbun SW, Raskob GE, Whitsett TL. Sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:227-32. [PMID: 10651604].
43. Winer-Muram HT, Rydberg J, Johnson MS, Tarver RD, Williams MD, Shah H, et al. Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. Radiology. 2004;233:806-15. [PMID: 15564410].
44. Roy PM, Colombet I, Durieux P, Chatellier G, Sors H, Meyer G. Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism. BMJ. 2005;331:259 [PMID: 16052017].
45. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, Kipfmueller F, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293:2012-7. [PMID: 15855435].
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Wu, D. J. Birmingham, B. Rovin, K. V. Hackshaw, N. Haddad, D. Haden, C.-Y. Yu, and L. A. Hebert D-Dimer Level and the Risk for Thrombosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2008; 3(6): 1628 - 1636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. P. Janjigian and B. E. Muhs Current Treatment of Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 15 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Toll, R Oudega, Y Vergouwe, K. Moons, and A. Hoes A new diagnostic rule for deep vein thrombosis: safety and efficiency in clinically relevant subgroups Fam. Pract., February 1, 2008; 25(1): 3 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Diagnosing Venous Thromboembolism Journal Watch (General), April 10, 2007; 2007(410): 3 - 3. [Full Text]
|
|
Read all Rapid Responses
