Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS

Evaluating the Prevalence and Risk Factors for Carrying Staphylococcus aureus in the Nonhospitalized U.S. Population

7 March 2006 | Volume 144 Issue 5 | Page I-22

Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.

Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.

The summary below is from the full report titled "A U.S. Population-Based Survey of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization." It is in the 7 March 2006 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 144, pages 318-325). The authors are P.L. Graham III, S.X. Lin, and E.L. Larson.


What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
space

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a type of bacteria commonly carried on the skin and in the noses of healthy people without causing infection. This is known as bacterial colonization. However, when S. aureus organisms invade the body, they can cause serious infections. Some S. aureus organisms can be treated easily with antibiotics (methicillin-sensitive S. aureus [MSSA]) while others are resistant to antibiotics, such as methicillin (methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]). Doctors don't know how commonly people in the United States are colonized with S. aureus and whether certain factors increase the risk for being colonized with MRSA.


Why did the researchers do this particular study?
space

To know the extent and pattern of colonization with S. aureus in the United States, what the risk factors were for being colonized with MRSA or with MSSA, and what antibiotics could be used to treat infections with these bacteria.


Who was studied?
space

9622 people from the general population of the United States who participated in a national health study (the 2001–2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES]) and who had bacterial cultures performed from a nasal swab specimen. The participants were representative of the U.S. population.


How was the study done?
space

The researchers analyzed the results of the most recent NHANES study, evaluating bacterial culture results, antibiotic resistance patterns of the bacteria, and personal characteristics of the participants (age, sex, race, ethnicity, education, and birthplace), as well as participants' insurance coverage, health status, and history of treatment with antibiotics and hospitalizations.


What did the researchers find?
space

The researchers estimated that 84 million people in the United States were colonized with MSSA and 2 million were colonized with MRSA. The highest rate of colonization with MRSA occurred among people who had lived in a long-term care facility within the past 12 months, those with diabetes, women, and people who were 65 years of age or older. Half of those colonized with MRSA had a genetic type of S. aureus that has previously been associated with hospital-acquired infections, and half had a type that has previously been associated with community-acquired infections. Black people and those of Mexican birth were less likely than others to be colonized with S. aureus. Those with the community type of MRSA were more likely to respond to antibiotics, such as erythromycin, clindamycin, and ciprofloxacin, all of which can be given by mouth.


What were the limitations of the study?
space

The data from the NHANES study are now several years old and may not provide an up-to-date picture of current patterns of colonization.


What are the implications of the study?
space

Doctors can use the information from this study to evaluate the risk for colonization with MRSA and provide more appropriate antibiotic care when infection occurs.


Related articles in Annals:

Articles
A U.S. Population-Based Survey of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization
Philip L. Graham, III, Susan X. Lin, AND Elaine L. Larson
Annals 2006 144: 318-325. [ABSTRACT][SUMMARY][Full Text]  




box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online