Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Bergman, G. J.D.
space
  arrow  van der Heijden, G. J.M.G.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

REPLY

Manipulative Therapy for Patients with Shoulder Symptoms

right arrow Gert J.D. Bergman, MSc; Jan C. Winters, MD, PhD; and Geert J.M.G. van der Heijden, PT, PhD

1 February 2005 | Volume 142 Issue 3 | Pages 226-227


IN RESPONSE:

The question regarding subgroup analysis is logical, considering the positive message of our study. Our study was designed to examine the efficacy of additional manipulative treatment for shoulder complaints. At baseline, all of the included patients experienced manifest pain in or dysfunction of the shoulder. At the same time, the physical examination also demonstrated a concomitant dysfunction of the cervicothoracic spine and the adjacent ribs (shoulder girdle dysfunction). We did not perform subgroup analyses on the efficacy of manipulative treatment with regard to specific conditions for several reasons. Subgroup analysis should be based on theoretical considerations. We do not expect large differential effects of manipulative techniques in treatment of shoulder dysfunction due to various postulated specific dysfunctions of the shoulder girdle. A firm theory regarding subgroup effects according to specific shoulder girdle dysfunction is lacking. Moreover, in our opinion, there are more similarities than differences among available manipulative techniques for specific conditions of the cervicothoracic spine and adjacent ribs. In addition, physical examination has not been shown to contribute to the accurate location of such specific conditions or differentiation among them (1). A recent study demonstrated that clinicians cannot accurately distinguish between neck and shoulder problems on physical examination (2). Finally, with our sample size of 150 patients, we were able to demonstrate significant results in our main analysis. Any subgroup analysis would require a larger sample size; the statistical power of such additional analyses in our sample is likely to be insufficient (3).


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

From University of Groningen, 9700 AD Groningen, and University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Pool JJ, Hoving JL, de Vet HC, van Mameren H, Bouter LM. The interexaminer reproducibility of physical examination of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:84-90. [PMID: 14970808].

2. Groenier KH, Winters JC, de Jong BM. Classification of shoulder complaints in general practice by means of nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:812-7. [PMID: 12808531].

3. Brookes ST, Whitely E, Egger M, Smith GD, Mulheran PA, Peters TJ. Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:229-36. [PMID: 15066682].

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.


Related articles in Annals:

Articles
Manipulative Therapy in Addition to Usual Medical Care for Patients with Shoulder Dysfunction and Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Gert J.D. Bergman, Jan C. Winters, Klaas H. Groenier, Jan J.M. Pool, Betty Meyboom-de Jong, Klaas Postema, AND Geert J.M.G. van der Heijden
Annals 2004 141: 432-439. [ABSTRACT][SUMMARY][Full Text]  

Letters
Manipulative Therapy for Patients with Shoulder Symptoms
Richard C. Galgano
Annals 2005 142: 226. [Full Text]  




box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Bergman, G. J.D.
space
  arrow  van der Heijden, G. J.M.G.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online