Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
HELP with high resolution image viewing | Return to article


Please click here to check whether you must obtain permission to reproduce this image.



Figure 1. Comparison of the results of 8000 randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and 8000 historical controlled studies (HCTs) obtained from resampling within the European Carotid Surgery Trial. The distribution of results indicates systematic bias (average odds ratios in the randomized, controlled trials and historical controlled studies were 1.23 and 1.06, respectively). Adapted with permission from reference 27: Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:iii-x, 1-173.





Return to article



 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online