Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike Add to Complore Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter
What's this?
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
 arrow  Edelman, J. M.
space
 arrow  PubMed                     
space

REPLY

Oral Montelukast versus Inhaled Salmeterol To Prevent Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction

right arrow Jonathan M. Edelman, MD

5 September 2000 | Volume 133 Issue 5 | Pages 392-395


IN RESPONSE:

The case of hepatitis reported by Dr. Grieco and Ms. Burstein-Stein concerns a patient who was receiving zafirlukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist. The clinical history and course indicate only that the patient's hepatitis appeared after the patient had been receiving zafirlukast for 4 months and resolved after zafirlukast therapy was discontinued. This temporal association falls far short of the evidence needed to conclude that the patient's hepatitis was drug-induced. Furthermore, because montelukast is chemically distinct from zafirlukast, it is incorrect to generalize from this single case to all antileukotriene drugs unless a mechanism-related cause has been identified. Clearly, this case report does not support such a cause.

We carefully monitored the effects of montelukast on liver function during development of the drug in more than 2600 adolescent and adult patients, 320 pediatric patients between the ages of 6 and 14 years, and 314 patients between the ages of 2 and 5 years, as well as in postmarketing surveillance (1). We found no evidence of hepatotoxic effects associated with the use of montelukast.

We respectfully disagree with Dr. Brestel's comments on the ethical issues and scientific importance of our research question. The study was conducted at 17 centers, each of which received approval from their institutional review board before conducting the study. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction is a common condition, with a prevalence exceeding 5% in the adult population, and even higher in children (2). Salmeterol is widely used for the prevention of exercise-induced asthma and is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for this use (3). Montelukast is a new therapy that has also demonstrated inhibition of exercise-induced asthma (4). Rigorously conducted randomized clinical trials represent the basis of the evidence on which treatment decisions are made. Our study, which directly compared these two therapies, provided important new information about the differences between them.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Merck & Co.; West Point, PA 19486-0004 (Edelman)


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1.  Singulair (montelukast sodium). Product circular. 1998.

2.  Cypcar D, Lemanske RF Jr. Asthma and exercise Clin Chest Med. 1994;15:351-68.[Medline]

3.  Serevent (salmeterol xinafoate). Product circular. 1994.

4.  Leff JA, Busse WW, Pearlman D, Bronsky EA, Kemp J, Hendeles L, et al. Montelukast, a leukotriene-receptor antagonist, for the treatment of mild asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction N Engl J Med. 1998;339:147-52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Annals:

Articles
Oral Montelukast Compared with Inhaled Salmeterol To Prevent Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial
Jonathan M. Edelman, Jennifer A. Turpin, Edwin A. Bronsky, Jay Grossman, James P. Kemp, Asma F. Ghannam, Paul T. DeLucca, Glenn J. Gormley, David S. Pearlman, AND for the Exercise Study Group*
Annals 2000 132: 97-104. [ABSTRACT][SUMMARY][Full Text]  

Letters
Oral Montelukast versus Inhaled Salmeterol To Prevent Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction
Anthony J. Grieco AND Jessica Burstein-Stein
Annals 2000 133: 392. [Full Text]  

Letters
Oral Montelukast versus Inhaled Salmeterol To Prevent Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction
Eric P. Brestel
Annals 2000 133: 392. [Full Text]  






 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Physicians.