Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Charney, P.
space
  arrow  Walsh, J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

REPLY

Update in Women's Health

right arrow Pamela Charney, MD, and Judith Walsh, MD, MPH

5 September 2000 | Volume 133 Issue 5 | Page 391


IN RESPONSE:

We appreciate Dr. Verdery's concerns about the widespread use of statin drugs in women, given the current lack of efficacy data. As we describe in our Update, "too few women were included to allow the authors to find a statistically significant reduction in coronary artery disease events in women (only 997 women among 6605 participants)"; as a result, the study did not have adequate power to detect a difference in women.

We, too, are concerned about the increase in breast cancer cases seen in treated women in both AFCAPS/TexCAPS (1) and the CARE trial (2). Although neither result was statistically significant, the trends were in the same direction. There are few data on the long-term safety of statin drugs in women. When a drug is given as preventive therapy, we believe it is particularly important that the goal of "primum, non nocere" (first of all, do no harm) be upheld.

Because women have a lower risk for coronary heart disease than men at any given age, many more women than men must be treated to prevent one coronary heart disease event. When deciding to treat a woman with an elevated cholesterol level, a clinician should consider this level in the context of the patient's other risk factors for coronary heart disease. The potential benefits and potential risks (both unproved) must be considered in the decision to treat a woman for hyperlipidemia.

Finally, we absolutely agree that randomized clinical trials must be designed to assess both efficacy and risks of treatment in women. As we have seen from AFCAPS/TexCAPS, simply including women is not enough. Women must be included in adequate numbers to allow investigators to determine whether treatment will benefit or harm them.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Jacobi Medical Center; Bronx, NY 10461 (Charney, Walsh)


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S, Whitney E, Shapiro DR, Beere PA, et al. Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study JAMA. 1998;279:1615-22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Rutherford JD, Cole TG, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial Investigators N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1001-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.


Related articles in Annals:

Updates from the Annual Session
Update in Women's Health
Pamela Charney, Judith Walsh, AND Ann B. Nattinger
Annals 1999 131: 952-958. [Full Text]  

Letters
Update in Women's Health
Roy Verdery
Annals 2000 133: 391. [Full Text]  




box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Charney, P.
space
  arrow  Walsh, J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online