REPLY
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy in Nonatrial Fibrillation
Edward Catherwood, MD, MS, and
Mark L. Greenberg, MD
21 December 1999 | Volume 131 Issue 12 | Page 979
IN RESPONSE:
Dr. Wiesel argues that all patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation should receive long-term anticoagulation after successful cardioversion. He cites the frequent association of paroxysmal or chronic atrial fibrillation with acute stroke (1). He also raises concern that our estimate of early stroke risk (a 6-week fraction of the annualized risk) if relapse occurs is too low, given the potential for paroxysmal episodes. He refers to the study by Lin and colleagues (1), which examined the frequency of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in patients presenting with acute stroke. This study did not assess the occurrence of stroke in patients with previously detected atrial fibrillation or those with previous cardioversion. Thus, it does not address whether most patients restored to sinus rhythm, with or without prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy, require warfarin beyond the first month after cardioversion. Furthermore, recent guidelines do not advocate long-term warfarin therapy after successful pharmacologic or electrical cardioversion unless the arrhythmia recurs or high-risk variables (that is, previous ischemic stroke and left ventricular systolic dysfunction) are present (2).
There is considerable debate about the optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are restored to sinus rhythm. We agree that patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, particularly if they do not sense the arrhythmia, may require longer-duration anticoagulation or more intense surveillance than suggested in our treatment paradigm. It is important to emphasize that the hypothetical cohort in our Markov model excluded patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and those with previous ischemic stroke. The AFFIRM (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management) trial (3) may ultimately provide definitive answers to the concerns raised by Dr. Wiesel and others (4). Until AFFIRM results are available, however, physicians need to individualize management of this common clinical condition.
|
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Lebanon, NH 03756 (Catherwood)
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Lebanon, NH 03756 (Greenberg)
1. Lin HJ, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Belanger AJ, D'Agostino RB. Newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation and acute stroke. The Framingham Study Stroke. 1995;26:1527-30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Laupacis A, Albers G, Dalen J, Dunn MI, Jacobsen AK, Singer DE. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation Chest. 1998;114:579S-89S.[Free Full Text]
3. Atrial fibrillation follow-up investigation of rhythm managementthe AFFIRM study design. The Planning and Steering Committees of the AFFIRM study for the NHLBI AFFIRM investigators. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:1198-202.
4. Prystowsky EN. Management of atrial fibrillation: simplicity surrounded by controversy Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:244-6.[Free Full Text]
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.