Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS

Preventing Bone Loss with Medications in Postmenopausal Women

21 December 1999 | Volume 131 Issue 12 | Page 935

Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.

Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine.

The summary below is from the full report titled "Alendronate and estrogen–progestin in the Long-Term Prevention of Bone Loss: Four-Year Results from the Early Postmenopausal Intervention Cohort Study. A Randomized, Controlled Trial." It is in the 12 December 1999 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 131, pages 935-942). The authors are P. Ravn, M. Bidstrup, R.D. Wasnich, J.W. Davis, M.R. McClung, A. Balske, C. Coupland, O. Sahota, A. Kaur, M. Daley, and G. Cizza, for the Early Postmenopausal Intervention Cohort Study Group.


What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
space

Bone loss (osteoporosis) is common among women after menopause and can lead to fractures. Alendronate is a medicine that slows further bone loss in women who already have osteoporosis. Less bone loss also occurs in women without osteoporosis who take alendronate daily for up to 3 years, but the effect of taking it for more than 3 years is not known. Taking estrogen and progesterone after menopause (hormone replacement) also prevents bone loss.


Why did the researchers do this particular study?
space

To find out 1) whether alendronate continues to prevent bone loss after 3 years of use in postmenopausal women without osteoporosis and 2) what happens to women's bones after they stop taking alendronate.


Who was studied?
space

The researchers studied 1609 healthy (non-osteoporotic) postmenopausal women 45 to 59 years old.


How was the study done?
space

The researchers assigned women randomly to get either alendronate, estrogen–progestin, or placebo (a pill containing no active ingredient). After 2 years, they then randomly assigned the women who had taken alendronate either to continue the same dose or to switch to placebo. They measured the density of all women's bones at the start of the study and yearly for the next 4 years.


What did the researchers find?
space

Women who took placebo for the entire 4 years lost the most bone, and women who took alendronate the entire time actually gained bone. Women who stopped alendronate after 2 years began to lose bone but still were better off than those who took placebo the whole time. Bone density increased in women on hormone replacement at least as much as in those on alendronate. Side effects were the same with alendronate and placebo. As expected, side effects such as vaginal bleeding and breast tenderness occurred in women who took hormone replacement.


What were the limitations of the study?
space

Women on alendronate or placebo did not know which treatment they were taking, but those on hormone replacement did. This may have contributed to the side effects experienced by women taking hormones, since people who know they are on a medicine watch more closely for side effects. The study therefore had limited ability to compare the side effects of hormone replacement and alendronate. The study could not determine which treatment was most effective in preventing fractures because fractures occur so seldom in non-osteoporotic, younger, healthy postmenopausal women. A much larger study sample would be required to demonstrate a potential protective effect against fractures.


What are the implications of the study?
space

Alendronate continues to prevent bone loss in women without osteoporosis who take it continuously for 4 years; hormone replacement is at least equally effective. If women stop alendronate after 2 years, they begin again to lose bone but are still better off than if they had never taken the drug. Alendronate is an option for preventing osteoporosis in women who cannot or choose not to take hormone replacement.


Related articles in Annals:

Articles
Alendronate and Estrogen–Progestin in the Long-Term Prevention of Bone Loss: Four-Year Results from the Early Postmenopausal Intervention Cohort Study: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Pernille Ravn, Marianne Bidstrup, Richard D. Wasnich, James W. Davis, Michael R. McClung, Ana Balske, Carol Coupland, Opinder Sahota, Amarjot Kaur, Marianne Daley, Giovanni Cizza, AND for the Early Postmenopausal Intervention Cohort Study Group*
Annals 1999 131: 935-942. [ABSTRACT][SUMMARY][Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
D.J. Hosking, P. Geusens, and R. Rizzoli
Osteoporosis therapy: an example of putting evidence-based medicine into clinical practice
QJM, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 403 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. R. McClung, R. D. Wasnich, D. J. Hosking, C. Christiansen, P. Ravn, M. Wu, A. M. Mantz, J. Yates, P. D. Ross, A. C. Santora II, et al.
Prevention of Postmenopausal Bone Loss: Six-Year Results from the Early Postmenopausal Intervention Cohort Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2004; 89(10): 4879 - 4885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. Lipton
Toward New Horizons: The Future of Bisphosphonate Therapy
Oncologist, September 1, 2004; 9(suppl_4): 38 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. S. Stafford, R. L. Drieling, and A. L. Hersh
National Trends in Osteoporosis Visits and Osteoporosis Treatment, 1988-2003
Arch Intern Med, July 26, 2004; 164(14): 1525 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. S. Siris, Y.-T. Chen, T. A. Abbott, E. Barrett-Connor, P. D. Miller, L. E. Wehren, and M. L. Berger
Bone Mineral Density Thresholds for Pharmacological Intervention to Prevent Fractures
Arch Intern Med, May 24, 2004; 164(10): 1108 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
I. R. Reid, R. Eastell, I. Fogelman, J. D. Adachi, A. Rosen, C. Netelenbos, N. B. Watts, E. Seeman, A. V. Ciaccia, and M. W. Draper
A Comparison of the Effects of Raloxifene and Conjugated Equine Estrogen on Bone and Lipids in Healthy Postmenopausal Women
Arch Intern Med, April 26, 2004; 164(8): 871 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Doren, J.-A. Nilsson, and O. Johnell
Effects of specific post-menopausal hormone therapies on bone mineral density in post-menopausal women: a meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1737 - 1746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. Wartofsky
Update in Endocrinology
Ann Intern Med, October 16, 2001; 135(8_Part_1): 601 - 609.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
G. T. Lesser
Long-Term Prevention of Bone Loss
Ann Intern Med, July 4, 2000; 133(1): 72 - 72.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. Ravn, R. D. Wasnich, and G. Cizza
Long-Term Prevention of Bone Loss
Ann Intern Med, July 4, 2000; 133(1): 72 - 73.
[Full Text] [PDF]


box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online