Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Vandenbroucke, J. P.
space
  arrow  Rosendaal, F. R.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Epidemiology of Oral Contraceptives and Cardiovascular Disease

right arrow Jan P. Vandenbroucke, MD, PhD; Frans M. Helmerhorst, MD, PhD; and Frits R. Rosendaal, MD, PhD

1 November 1998 | Volume 129 Issue 9 | Page 747


TO THE EDITOR:

Chasan-Taber and Stampfer [1] present the "recency of market introduction" as a potential source of bias in evaluating the risk for venous thrombosis associated with new oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or gestodene. The argument is that women receiving these pills started using them more recently, those receiving older contraceptives had been using them for a longer time, and the risk for thrombosis is higher in the early periods of use. The straightforward solution is to compare "like with like": women who are receiving different brands for similar time periods. This analysis was done by Jick and colleagues [2], who found that in the first 6 months of use, women receiving desogestrel and gestodene contraceptives have a sixfold to ninefold greater risk for venous thrombosis relative to women receiving levonogestrel contraceptives. In several other studies, separate analyses showed that relative risk was increased rather than decreased in the first period of use [3]. The correct interpretation of these findings is that the excess risk of desogestrel and gestodene contraceptives cannot be explained by "recency of introduction bias" because the effect does not disappear upon stratification. The higher excess risk in the first period of use indicates effect modification and supports the decision of the British and German authorities to caution against first-time prescription of these pills to young women.

Chasan-Taber and Stampfer misquote our paper: In the Leiden Thrombophilia Study, we did find the highest risk in the youngest users [4], in line with the data reported above. Because of the complexity of the issue, the World Health Organization convened an international group of independent scientists in November 1997. The main conclusions of their report, one of which is that contraceptives containing desogestrel or gestodene carry a risk for thrombosis beyond that of contraceptives containing levonorgestrel, have recently become available [5].


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Leiden University Medical Center; 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Chasan-Taber L, Stampfer MJ. Epidemiology of oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 128:467-77.

2. Jick II, Jick SS, Gurewich V, Myers MW, Vasilakis C. Risk of idiopathic cardiovascular death and nonfatal venous thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives with differing progestagen components. Lancet. 1995; 346:1589-93.

3. Vandenbroucke JP, Helmerhorst FM, Bloemenkamp KW, Rosendaal FR. Third-generation oral contraceptive and deep venous thrombosis: from epidemiologic controversy to new insights in coagulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177:887-91.

4. Bloemenkamp KW, Rosendaal FR, Helmerhorst FM, Bueller HR, Vandenbroucke JP. Enhancement by factor V Leiden mutation of risk of deep-vein thrombosis associated with oral contraceptives containing a third-generation progestagen. Lancet. 1995; 346:1593-6.

5. Cardiovascular disease and steroid hormone contraception. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. WHO Technical Report Series, no. 877. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Vandenbroucke, J. P.
space
  arrow  Rosendaal, F. R.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online