Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
15 August 1998 | Volume 129 Issue 4 | Pages 299-302
Background: Despite the widespread use of subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis, there are no guidelines for achieving adequate anticoagulation with this drug.
Objective: To implement a weight-based algorithm for the administration of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin after an intravenous loading dose.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: University hospital.
Participants: 70 outpatients with proximal venous thrombosis.
Intervention: An intravenous bolus of heparin followed by a subcutaneous injection of heparin in doses adjusted for body weight. Subsequent adjustments of the subcutaneous heparin dose were scheduled twice daily according to the algorithm; the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPT) was measured in the mid-interval (target range, 50 to 90 seconds).
Results: The therapeutic threshold aPT (
Conclusion: The administration of subcutaneous heparin according to a weight-based algorithm allows the rapid achievement of effective and safe anticoagulation in patients with deep venous thrombosis.
We implemented a weight-based algorithm for the subcutaneous administration of unfractionated heparin and evaluated the efficacy and safety of this therapy in 70 outpatients with proximal venous thrombosis.
Eligible patients were consenting symptomatic outpatients who had a first episode of proximal venous thrombosis, as assessed by compression ultrasonography. Exclusion criteria were contraindications to anticoagulation, ongoing full-dose anticoagulant therapy, pregnancy, and poor life expectancy. The institutional ethical board approved the investigation.
Intervention
Patients were given an intravenous bolus of sodium heparin (Liquemin, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and a subcutaneous injection of calcium heparin (Calciparina, Italfarmaco, Milan, Italy) in doses adjusted according to body weight (Table 1). BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Use of an Algorithm for Administering Subcutaneous Heparin in the Treatment of Deep Venous Thrombosis
50 seconds) was achieved in 61 patients (87%) within 24 hours and in 69 patients (99%) within 48 hours. In 7 patients (10%), a supratherapeutic aPT lasted more than 12 hours. No major bleeding episodes or cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were seen. Three patients (4.3% [95% CI, 0.9% to 12.0%]) had recurrent thromboembolism during 3 months of follow-up.
Patients with deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities are usually treated with an initial course of unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin, followed by long-term oral anticoagulation [1, 2]. The use of nomograms for the intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin assures that almost all patients will promptly achieve sustained anticoagulation [3-5]. Subcutaneous heparin has been shown to be as effective and safe as intravenous heparin [6]; in addition, low-molecular-weight heparins may facilitate the early discharge of suitable patients from the hospital, with the accompanying advantage of a relatively low cost. However, no accepted guidelines exist with which to achieve adequate anticoagulation with subcutaneous administration of heparin.
Methods
![]()
Top
Methods
Results
Discussion
Author & Article Info
References
Patients
|
The first activated partial thromboplastin time (aPT) was done after 6 hours, and subsequent dose adjustments during the first 48 hours were scheduled twice daily according to the algorithm shown in Table 1. The aPT was performed in the mid-interval. Adjustments were arranged in "steps" to be run up or down according to aPT, regardless of body weight. The target aPT range (50 to 90 seconds) was calibrated to correspond to a heparin plasma level (as expressed by antifactor Xa [aXa] activity) of 0.35 to 0.70 U/mL.
To avoid unnecessary overanticoagulation [7, 8], an aXa assay was scheduled if the aPT was subtherapeutic 6 hours after the administration of 25 000 U of heparin. If the aXa level exceeded 0.35 U/mL, the heparin dose was not modified. After the first 48 hours, heparin administration was managed on the basis of daily aPT determinations.
Sodium warfarin therapy was begun on the first or second day and was continued for 12 weeks, with the dose adjusted to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. Heparin therapy was discontinued if the international normalized ratio in patients who had received the study drug for at least 5 days was greater than 2.0 for 2 consecutive days.
Clinical Evaluation
Patients were examined daily for signs and symptoms of recurrent thromboembolism, bleeding, or the occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (decrease in platelet count to <109 cells/L or to >50% below the baseline count).
Follow-up visits were scheduled after 1 and 3 months. Patients were asked to return to the study center if clinical manifestations of recurrent thromboembolism occurred. Recurrent venous thromboembolism was diagnosed according to standard methods [9, 10]. Bleeding was defined as major if it was intracranial or retroperitoneal or was associated with a decrease in the hemoglobin level of at least 2.0 g/dL. Autopsy was intended for all decedents in whom pulmonary embolism could not be excluded.
Study Outcomes and Analysis
We determined the proportion of patients who achieved the therapeutic threshold (aPT
50 seconds) within 24 and 48 hours and the time elapsed from initiation of heparin therapy until achievement of the threshold aPT. We calculated the percentage of patients with supratherapeutic aPT that persisted for more than 12 hours. We also evaluated the rate of recurrent thromboembolism during heparin treatment and follow-up and the rate of major bleeding occurring during heparin treatment and during the following 48 hours.
Descriptive statistics were calculated according to standard methods; 95% CIs were estimated by using the exact method. The time from initiation of heparin therapy until achievement of the aPT threshold was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twenty-seven of 97 eligible patients were excluded because of ongoing full-dose anticoagulant therapy (15 patients), contraindications to heparin (4 patients), refusal to participate (4 patients), poor life expectancy (3 patients), and pregnancy (1 patient). Thus, 70 patients were enrolled (25 men; median age, 65 years). Three patients weighed less than 50 kg, 21 weighed 50 to 70 kg, and 46 weighed more than 70 kg. Risk factors for thrombosis were identifiable in 51 patients: cancer (20 patients), prolonged immobilization (14 patients), recent trauma (9 patients), thrombophilia (5 patients), and estrogen therapy (3 patients).
Biological Outcomes
Eighty-seven percent of patients (61 of 70) achieved the aPT threshold within 24 hours, and 99% (69 of 70) achieved the threshold in 48 hours. Figure 1 shows the Kaplan-Meier curve for the heparin therapeutic threshold. Seven patients (10.0% [95% CI, 4.1% to 19.5%]) had supratherapeutic aPT that persisted for more than 12 hours. In 2 of the 4 patients who had a subtherapeutic aPT despite the administration of 25 000 U of heparin, the aXa assay showed a plasma heparin level greater than 0.35 U/mL.
|
The mean (±SD) heparin doses administered were 39 700 ± 5300 U during the first day and 30 500 ± 10 800 U during the second day. No patient required less than 10 000 U or more than 30 000 U twice daily to prolong the aPT (or aXa) level. The median duration of heparin treatment was 6.5 days (range, 5 to 12 days).
Clinical Outcomes
During the initial period of heparin treatment and follow-up, thromboembolism recurred in three patients (4.3% [CI, 0.9% to 12%]). One of the three (age, 93 years) died of autopsy-proven pulmonary embolism within 5 days after heparin treatment began. Both the aPT and the international normalized ratio were in the therapeutic range. The two other patients had contralateral thrombosis (one after 8 weeks and one after 10 weeks), as assessed by compression ultrasonography. In all three patients, the aPT threshold had been achieved within 24 hours of initiation of heparin therapy.
No major bleeding episodes or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia occurred during heparin treatment (0% [CI, 0.0% to 5.0%]), and no patient was lost to follow-up. Five patients died during the follow-up period: Four died of cancer (one after 65 days, one after 72 days, one after 80 days, and one after 85 days), and one died of pleural hemorrhage that occurred 1 month after heparin therapy began.
Discussion
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
An intravenous loading dose was chosen because of the poor bioavailability of subcutaneous heparin [8], and weight-adjusted heparin doses were chosen because body weight is the single best predictor of individual heparin requirements [5, 14, 15]. The combination of an initial intravenous bolus and weight-adjusted heparin doses probably explains the high biological success rates achieved with our protocol, rates that are similar to those recently reported with the use of a weight-based intravenous heparin nomogram [5, 16].
Of interest, the mean daily amount of heparin required to prolong the aPT during the first 24 hours (almost 40 000 U) was greater than the dose (30 000 to 35 000 U) usually required to attain proper anticoagulation with intravenous administration [1, 3-5, 8]. The implication of this finding is that the common practice of injecting as much subcutaneous heparin as is commonly administered intravenously for the initial treatment of patients with thrombotic disorders is likely to produce insufficient anticoagulation, thereby increasing the likelihood of recurrent thromboembolism [17-19].
A few considerations deserve careful analysis. Because of a relatively small sample size and the lack of a control group, our results should be validated in other cohorts of patients to ensure external validity. In addition, because we confined our investigation to symptomatic outpatients with a first episode of venous thrombosis, widespread generalization of this therapeutic regimen requires proper evaluation in patients who develop thrombosis during hospitalization and in those presenting with pulmonary embolism or recurrent thromboembolism.
In conclusion, the use of a weight-based algorithm for the subcutaneous administration of unfractionated heparin may greatly simplify the initial treatment of venous thromboembolic disorders. It enables the early mobilization of patients with venous thrombosis and allows the early discharge of suitable patients. The relatively low cost of unfractionated heparin makes this approach attractive in comparison with the use of low-molecular-weight heparins. This strategy has major implications for the short-term treatment of a broad spectrum of conditions for which heparin is indicated, such as unstable angina and myocardial infarction.
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
References
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Ginsberg JS. Management of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335:1816-28.
2. Weitz JI. Low-molecular-weight heparins. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337:688-98.
3. Cruickshank MK, Levine MN, Hirsh J, Roberts R, Siguenza M. A standard heparin nomogram for the management of heparin therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1991; 151:333-7.
4. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Rosenbloom D, Lemaire J, Pineo GF, Baylis B, et al. Optimal therapeutic level of heparin therapy in patients with venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med. 1992; 152:1589-95.
5. Raschke RA, Reilly BM, Guidry JR, Fontana JR, Srinivas S. The weight-based heparin dosing nomogram compared with a "standard care" nomogram. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119:874-81.
6. Hommes DW, Bura A, Mazzolai L, Buller HR, ten Cate JW. Subcutaneous heparin compared with continuous intravenous heparin administration in the initial treatment of deep vein thrombosis. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 116:279-84.
7. Levine MN, Hirsh J, Gent M, Turple AG, Cruickshank M, Weitz J, et al. A randomized trial comparing activated thromboplastin time with heparin assay in patients with acute venous thromboembolism requiring large daily doses of heparin. Arch Intern Med. 1994; 154:49-56.
8. Hirsh J, Raschke R, Warkentin TE, Dalen JE, Deykin D, Poller L. Heparin: mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing considerations, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. Chest. 1995; 108(Suppl 4):258-75.
9. Prandoni P, Cogo A, Bernardi E, Villalta S, Polistena P, Simioni P, et al. A simple ultrasound approach for detection of recurrent proximal-vein thrombosis. Circulation. 1993; 88(4 pt 1):1730-5.
10. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED Investigators. JAMA. 1990; 263:2753-9.
11. Koopman MM, Prandoni P, Piovella F, Ockelford PA, Brandjes DP, van der Meer J, et al. Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. The Tasman Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334:682-7.
12. Levine M, Gent M, Hirsh J, Leclerc J, Anderson D, Weitz J, et al. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334:677-81.
13. Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. The Columbus Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337:657-62.
14. Cipolle RJ, Seifert RD, Neilan BA, Zaske DE, Haus E. Heparin kinetics: variables related to disposition and dosage. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981; 29:387-9.
15. White RH, Zhou H, Woo L, Mungall D. Effect of weight, sex, age, clinical diagnosis, and thromboplastin reagent on steady-state intravenous heparin requirements. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157:2468-72.
16. Raschke RA, Gollihare B, Peirce JC. The effectiveness of implementing the weight-based heparin nomogram as a practice guideline. Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156:1645-9.
17. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Hirsh J, Jay RM, Leclerc JR, Geerts WH, et al. Continuous intravenous heparin compared with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1986; 315:1109-14.
18. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Brant RF, Pineo GF, Valentine KA. The importance of initial heparin treatment on long-term clinical outcomes of antithrombotic therapy. The emerging theme of delayed recurrence. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157:2317-21.
19. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Brant RF, Pineo GF, Valentine KA. Relation between the time to achieve the lower limit of the APT therapeutic range and recurrent venous thromboembolism during heparin treatment for deep vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157:2562-8.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Prandoni How I treat venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer Blood, December 15, 2005; 106(13): 4027 - 4033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Writing Committee for the Galilei Investigators Subcutaneous Adjusted-Dose Unfractionated Heparin vs Fixed-Dose Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in the Initial Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism Arch Intern Med, May 24, 2004; 164(10): 1077 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. J. van Dongen, R. Vink, B. A. Hutten, H. R. Buller, and M. H. Prins The Incidence of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism After Treatment With Vitamin K Antagonists in Relation to Time Since First Event: A Meta-analysis Arch Intern Med, June 9, 2003; 163(11): 1285 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Alatri, P. Bucciarelli, and M. Moia Subcutaneous Heparin for Deep Venous Thrombosis Ann Intern Med, June 15, 1999; 130(12): 1027 - 1027. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||