| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 December 1998 | Volume 129 Issue 12 | Pages 1027-1030
Background: Omeprazole is metabolized by S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19) in the liver. In persons with a poor-metabolizer genotype for CYP2C19, the therapeutic efficacy of omeprazole may be increased.
Objective: To investigate whether CYP2C19 genotype status is associated with cure rates for Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic ulcer achieved by using dual therapy with omeprazole and amoxicillin.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: University hospital and health service center in Hamamatsu, Japan.
Patients: 62 patients with peptic ulcer and H. pylori infection.
Intervention: Omeprazole and amoxicillin.
Measurements: CYP2C19 genotype status and cure rates for H. pylori infection and peptic ulcer.
Results: Cure rates for H. pylori infection were 28.6% (95% CI, 13.1% to 48.7%), 60% (CI, 38.6% to 83.0%), and 100% (CI, 66.4% to 100%) in the rapid-, intermediate-, and poor-metabolizer groups, respectively. Healing rates for both duodenal and gastric ulcer in the three groups were roughly parallel with cure rates for H. pylori infection.
Conclusion: The results of the genotyping test for CYP2C19 seem to predict cure of H. pylori infection and peptic ulcer in patients who receive dual therapy with omeprazole and amoxicillin.
Omeprazole is metabolized in the liver by a genetically determined enzyme, S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19) [10-12]. In persons with a poor-metabolizer phenotype or genotype of CYP2C19, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of omeprazole is markedly increased [10-12] and the clinical effect of omeprazole should be greater. On the basis of this assumption, we prospectively studied whether differences in CYP2C19 genotype status would affect cure rates for H. pylori infection and peptic ulcer in patients who received dual therapy with omeprazole and amoxicillin.
For the treatment of ulcer, 20 mg of omeprazole was administered once daily after breakfast for 8 weeks to patients with gastric ulcer and for 6 weeks to patients with duodenal ulcer. In addition, 500 mg of amoxicillin was given four times daily to all patients for the first 2 weeks of omeprazole treatment. Patient adherence to therapy and occurrence of side effects were assessed by interview. Gastroduodenoscopy and determination of H. pylori infection were done before and 1 month after treatment. Endoscopists were blinded to patients' treatment status and genotypes. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before the study began, and our protocol was approved by the Human Institutional Review Board of Hamamatsu University School of Medicine.
During gastroduodenoscopy, we performed routine inspection of the upper gastrointestinal tract and obtained gastric juice and several biopsy specimens from both the antrum and the corpus of the greater curvature for rapid urease testing, bacteriologic culture, histologic examination, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), as reported elsewhere [13]. All patients also had 13C-urea breath testing [13].
Cure of H. pylori infection was determined according to the results of culture, histologic examination, rapid urease testing, 13C-urea breath testing, and PCR. Failure to cure H. pylori infection was defined as a positive result on any of these tests.
Genotyping procedures identifying CYP2C19 wild-type gene and the two mutated alleles, CYP2C19m1 in exon 5 and CYP2C19m2 in exon 4, were performed by a PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism method, as described by de Morais and colleagues [14, 15], with minor modifications as reported by Kubota and coworkers [16].
Numeric data are given as the mean ±SD. Statistical differences in mean age, body weight, ratios of gastric ulcer to duodenal ulcer, and cure rates for H. pylori infection among the genotype groups were determined by using one-way analysis of variance and the Fisher exact test. Calculations were done with SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). All P values were two-sided; P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Five different allelic patterns were noted in the 62 patients. Of the 62 patients, 28 were homozygous for the wild-type alleles (rapid-metabolizer group) in both exon 5 and exon 4 (wild-type/wild-type), 21 were heterozygous for the CYP2C19 (m1) mutation without the CYP2C19m2 mutation (wild-type/CYP2C19m1), 4 were heterozygous for the CYP2C19m2 mutation without CYP2C19m1 mutation (wild-type/CYP2C19m2), 4 were heterozygous for the CYP2C19m1 mutation and the CYP2C19m2 mutation (CYP2C19m1/CYP2C19m2), and 5 were homozygous for the CYP2C19m1 mutation without the CYP2C19m2 mutation (CYP2C19m1/CYP2C19m1). Patients were arbitrarily classified into three genotype groups as follows: Group 1 was the nonmutation group (wild-type/wild-type) (n = 28), group 2 was the one-mutation group (wild-type/CYP2C19m1 or wild-type/CYP2C19m2) (n = 25), and group 3 was the two-mutation group (CYP2C19m1/CYP2C19m1 or CYP2C19m1/CYP2C19m2) (n = 9) (Table 1). The CYP2C19 phenotypes of groups 1, 2, and 3 correspond to the rapid-extensive metabolizer, intermediate-extensive metabolizer, and poor-metabolizer phenotypes of CYP2C19, respectively [11, 16]. The relative mean area under the curve for omeprazole in the rapid-, intermediate-, and poor-metabolizer groups has been reported to be 1:3.7:20 [11]. BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Effect of Genetic Differences in Omeprazole Metabolism on Cure Rates for Helicobacter pylori Infection and Peptic Ulcer
Eradication of Helicobacter pylori is very efficacious in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal disease [1-3]. Current strategies for the cure of H. pylori infection include triple therapy with a proton-pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin or metronidazole [1-6], but the development of resistance of H. pylori to the latter two drugs has been reported [7-9]. Although dual therapy with omeprazole and amoxicillin achieves somewhat lower cure rates for H. pylori infection [4, 6], it avoids many of the problems associated with clarithromycin and metronidazole. Therefore, an understanding of the determinants of the success or failure of attempts to cure H. pylori infection with dual therapy is clinically important.
Methods
![]()
Top
Methods
Results
Discussion
Author & Article Info
References
The study sample consisted of 62 Japanese patients with gastric ulcer (n = 33) or duodenal ulcer (n = 29). Sixty-one patients were male, and 1 was female; the mean age (±SD) was 46.5 ± 6.0 years. All patients had endoscopically proven ulcer and were positive for H. pylori on rapid urease testing, culture, and histologic examination.
Results
![]()
Top
Methods
Results
Discussion
Author & Article Info
References
No clinically undesirable signs or symptoms attributable to the dual therapy used in our study were recognized during the study period. All patients completed the study according to the protocol. Adherence to the prescribed medication regimen was 100% in 43 patients, about 90% in 18 patients, and about 75% in 1 patient. Helicobacter pylori was eradicated in 58%, 33%, and 100% of patients whose adherence was 100%, 90%, and 75%, respectively.
|
Helicobacter pylori infection was cured in 32 of the 62 patients (51.6% [95% CI, 38.5% to 64.6%]). The cure rates of H. pylori infection for the three genotype groups are shown in Table 2. The cure rate was highest in group 3, intermediate in group 2, and lowest in group 1. Ulcer healing was achieved in 27 of the 33 patients with gastric ulcer and 24 of the 29 patients with duodenal ulcer. In patients in whom H. pylori infection was cured, all ulcer lesions were healed at follow-up endoscopic examination. Ulcer healing rates for patients with gastric ulcer in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 58.8% (CI, 27.7% to 84.8%) (7 of 12 patients), 92.9% (CI, 75.3% to 99.8%) (13 of 14 patients), and 100.0% (59.0% to 100.0%) (7 of 7 patients), respectively. Ulcer healing rates for patients with duodenal ulcer were 81.3% (CI, 54.4% to 96.0%) (13 of 16 patients), 81.8% (48.2% to 97.7%) (9 of 11 patients), and 100.0% (15.8% to 100.0%) (2 of 2 patients), respectively.
|
Discussion
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
We suggest several reasons why dual treatment may yield greater success in curing H. pylori infection in patients with the poor-metabolizer genotype (group 3) than in those with the extensive-metabolizer genotypes (groups 1 and 2). First, because the metabolic disposition of omeprazole co-segregates with genetically determined CYP2C19 enzyme activity, the plasma concentration-time curve of omeprazole (that is, the systemic availability of the drug in circulation) is markedly increased in persons with the poor-metabolizer phenotype or genotype of CYP2C19 [10-12]. Consequently, the duration of high intragastric pH levels would be longer in patients with the poor-metabolizer genotype than in those with the extensive-metabolizer genotypes. Second, because amoxicillin is unstable and its antibacterial activity is decreased under low pH conditions, increasing the intragastric pH to neutral levels by using acid-inhibitory agents such as omeprazole may increase the availability of active antibiotic [17]. Third, omeprazole has been reported to increase amoxicillin concentrations in gastric juice [18]. Accordingly, when omeprazole and amoxicillin are coadministered, amoxicillin would be more stable and would be available in the stomach for longer periods at levels exceeding its minimum inhibitory concentration in patients with the poor-metabolizer genotype. Finally, omeprazole itself has been reported to have anti-H. pylori activity [19], which is presumably enhanced in patients with the poor-metabolizer genotype. Thus, both the higher cure rates for H. pylori infection and an increased acid-inhibitory effect of omeprazole may contribute to the excellent ulcer healing rates seen in patients with the poor-metabolizer genotype of CYP2C19 who have either gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer disease.
Substantial ethnic differences have been reported in the incidence of the poor-metabolizer genotype of CYP2C19. The frequency of this genotype is much lower (3% to 5%) in white U.S. or European populations than in Japanese persons (18% to 23%) [9-11]. Thus, it seems reasonable that dual therapy with omeprazole (20 to 40 mg/d) and amoxicillin (2000 mg/d) has generally not achieved adequate cure rates for H. pylori infection and ulcer disease in white persons [4, 6]. However, Bayerdorffer and associates [20] reported that dual therapy with high dosages of omeprazole (40 mg three times daily) and amoxicillin (750 mg three times daily) could achieve a cure rate of 91% in white persons, even though most of the patients probably had extensive-metabolizer genotypes. A dose of at least 120 mg of omeprazole in dual therapy may therefore be required to achieve a sufficiently high cure rate of H. pylori infection in persons with extensive-metabolizer genotypes.
Our results must be interpreted within the context of our study's limitations. First, we did not measure plasma omeprazole levels and were therefore unable to directly correlate H. pylori infection and ulcer cure rates with plasma drug availability. Second, our sample size was small. Our findings must be considered preliminary; further study is required in larger groups of patients and should include measurement of plasma omeprazole concentrations. The additional costs of establishing the genotypic status of patients through direct genetic testing and of using larger doses of omeprazole in dual therapy in persons with extensive-metabolizer genotypes may be offset by the reduced costs and toxicity associated with avoidance of a second antibiotic, but the clinical usefulness and cost-effectiveness of genotyping as a clinical tool in the management of H. pylori-associated gastrointestinal disease remain to be determined.
Drs. Ohashi and Kosuge: Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 3600, Handa-cho, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan.
Dr. Kamata: Hamamatsu Health Service Center, Honda Motor Co., Ltd., Hamamatsu Factory, 1-13-1, Aoihigashi, Hamamatsu 433-8501, Japan.
Dr. Kawasaki: Second Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 3600, Handa-cho, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan.
Dr. Kubota: Research Testing Department, SRL, Inc., Hachioji Laboratory 153, Komiya-cho, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-8535, Japan.
Dr. Ishizaki: Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Clinical Pharmacy, Kumamoto University, Oe-Honmachi, 5-1, Kumamoto 862-0973, Japan.
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
References
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Goodwin CS, Mendali MM, Northfield TC.Helicobacter pylori infection. Lancet. 1997; 349:265-9.
2. Soll AH. Consensus conference. Medical treatment of peptic ulcer disease. Practice guidelines. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. JAMA. 1996; 275:622-9.
3. Ofman JJ, Etchason J, Fullerton S, Kahn KL, Soli AH. Management strategies for Helicobacter pylori-seropositive patients with dyspepsia: clinical and economic consequences. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126:280-91.
4. al-Assi MT, Cole RA, Karttunen TJ, el-Zimaity H, Genta RM, Graham DY. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection with omeprazole-amoxicillin combination therapy versus ranitidine/sodium bicarbonate-amoxicillin. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995; 90:1411-4.
5. Walsh JH, Peterson WL. The treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in the management of peptic ulcer diseases. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333:984-91.
6. Unge P. Review of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996; 31(Suppl 215):74-81.
7. Cederbrant G, Kahlmeter G, Ljungh A. Proposed mechanism for metronidazole resistance in Helicobacter pylori. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992; 29:115-20.
8. Results of a multicentre European survey in 1991 of metronidazole resistance in Helicobacter pylori. European Study Group on Antibiotic Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992; 11:777-81.
9. Peterson WL, Graham DY, Marshall B, Blaser MJ, Genta RM, Klein PD, et al. Clarithromycin as monotherapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a randomized, double-blind trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993; 88:1860-4.
10. Sohn DR, Kobayashi K, Chiba K, Lee KH, Shin SG, Ishizaki T. Disposition kinetics and metabolism of omeprazole in extensive and poor metabolizers of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation recruited from an Oriental population. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992; 262:1195-202.
11. Chang M, Tybring G, Dahl ML, Gotharson E, Sagar M, Seensalu R, et al. Interphenotype differences in disposition and effect on gastrin levels of omeprazole-suitability of omeprazole as a probe for CYP2C19. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995; 39:511-8.
12. Ieiri I, Kubota T, Urae A, Kimura M, Wada Y, Mamiya K, et al. Pharmacokinetics of omeprazole (a substrate of CYP2C19) and comparison with two mutant alleles, C
P2C19m1 in exon 5 and C
P2C19m2 in exon 4, in Japanese subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996; 59:647-53.
13. Furuta T, Kaneko E, Suzuki M, Arai H, Futami H. Quantitative study of Helicobacter pylori in gastric mucus by competitive PCR using synthetic DNA fragments. J Clin Microbiol. 1996; 34:2421-5.
14. de Morais SM, Wilkinson GR, Blaisdell J, Nakamura K, Meyer UA, Goldstein JA. The major genetic defect responsible for the polymorphism of S-mephenytoin metabolism in humans. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269:15419-22.
15. de Morais SM, Wilkinson GR, Blaisdell J, Meyer UA, Nakamura K, Goldstein JA. Identification of a new genetic defect responsible for the polymorphism of (S)-mephenytoin metabolism in Japanese. Mol Pharmacol. 1994; 46:594-8.
16. Kubota T, Chiba K, Ishizaki T. Genotyping of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation in an extended Japanese population. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996; 60:661-6.
17. Grayson ML, Eliopoulos GM, Ferraro MJ, Moellering RC Jr. Effect of varying pH on the susceptibility of Campylobacter pylori to antimicrobial agents. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989; 8:888-9.
18. Goddard AF, Jessa MJ, Barrett DA, Shaw PN, Idstrom JP, Cederberg C, et al. Effect of omeprazole on the distribution of metronidazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin in human gastric juice. Gastroenterology. 1996; 111:358-67.
19. Midolo PD, Turnidge JD, Lambert JR, Bell JM. Oxygen concentration influences proton pump inhibitor activity against Helicobacter pylori in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996; 40:1531-3.
20. Bayerdorffer E, Miehlke S, Mannes GA, Sommer A, Hochter W, Weingart J, et al. Double-blind trial of omeprazole and amoxicillin to cure Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcers. Gastroenterology. 1995; 108:1412-7.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Williams, T. Andersson, T. B. Andersson, R. Blanchard, M. O. Behm, N. Cohen, T. Edeki, M. Franc, K. M. Hillgren, K. J. Johnson, et al. PhRMA White Paper on ADME Pharmacogenomics J. Clin. Pharmacol., July 1, 2008; 48(7): 849 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lofgren, R. M. Baldwin, M. Hiratsuka, A. Lindqvist, A. Carlberg, S. C. Sim, M. Schulke, M. Snait, A. Edenro, R. Fransson-Steen, et al. Generation of Mice Transgenic for Human CYP2C18 and CYP2C19: Characterization of the Sexually Dimorphic Gene and Enzyme Expression Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 955 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Court A Pharmacogenomics Primer J. Clin. Pharmacol., September 1, 2007; 47(9): 1087 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Roden, R. B. Altman, N. L. Benowitz, D. A. Flockhart, K. M. Giacomini, J. A. Johnson, R. M. Krauss, H. L. McLeod, M. J. Ratain, M. V. Relling, et al. Pharmacogenomics: Challenges and Opportunities. Ann Intern Med, November 21, 2006; 145(10): 749 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Meletiadis, S. Chanock, and T. J. Walsh Human Pharmacogenomic Variations and Their Implications for Antifungal Efficacy Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2006; 19(4): 763 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W Devlin, L. S Welage, and K. M Olsen Proton Pump Inhibitor Formulary Considerations in the Acutely Ill Part 1: Pharmacology, Pharmacodynamics, and Available Formulations Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2005; 39(10): 1667 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Wilkinson Drug Metabolism and Variability among Patients in Drug Response N. Engl. J. Med., May 26, 2005; 352(21): 2211 - 2221. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Yasui-Furukori, M. Saito, T. Uno, T. Takahata, K. Sugawara, and T. Tateishi Effects of Fluvoxamine on Lansoprazole Pharmacokinetics in Relation to CYP2C19 Genotypes J. Clin. Pharmacol., November 1, 2004; 44(11): 1223 - 1229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kim, J. A. Johnson, and H. Derendorf Differences in Drug Pharmacokinetics Between East Asians and Caucasians and the Role of Genetic Polymorphisms J. Clin. Pharmacol., October 1, 2004; 44(10): 1083 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Q. P. Yin, B. Tomlinson, A. H. L. Chow, M. M. Y. Waye, and M. S. S. Chow Omeprazole as a CYP2C19 Marker in Chinese Subjects: Assessment of Its Gene-Dose Effect and Intrasubject Variability J. Clin. Pharmacol., June 1, 2004; 44(6): 582 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Ma, A. N. Nafziger, and J. S. Bertino Jr. Genetic Polymorphisms of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and the Effect on Interindividual, Pharmacokinetic Variability in Extensive Metabolizers J. Clin. Pharmacol., May 1, 2004; 44(5): 447 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Lehmann, J. J. Medicis, and P. D. Franklin Polymorphisms and the Pocketbook: The Cost-Effectiveness of Cytochrome P450 2C19 Genotyping in the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection Associated with Duodenal Ulcer J. Clin. Pharmacol., December 1, 2003; 43(12): 1316 - 1323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Chen, S. S. Ferguson, M. Negishi, and J. A. Goldstein Identification of Constitutive Androstane Receptor and Glucocorticoid Receptor Binding Sites in the CYP2C19 Promoter Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2003; 64(2): 316 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W E Evans Pharmacogenomics: marshalling the human genome to individualise drug therapy Gut, May 1, 2003; 52(90002): ii10 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Weinshilboum Inheritance and Drug Response N. Engl. J. Med., February 6, 2003; 348(6): 529 - 537. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J.J. Wood Racial Differences in the Response to Drugs -- Pointers to Genetic Differences N. Engl. J. Med., May 3, 2001; 344(18): 1393 - 1396. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ingelman-Sundberg Implications of Polymorphic Cytochrome P450-Dependent Drug Metabolism for Drug Development Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2001; 29(4): 570 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Roden and N. J. Brown Preprescription Genotyping : Not Yet Ready for Prime Time, but Getting There Circulation, March 27, 2001; 103(12): 1608 - 1610. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shu, L.-S. Wang, Z.-H. Xu, N. He, W.-M. Xiao, W. Wang, S.-L. Huang, and H.-H. Zhou 5-Hydroxylation of Omeprazole by Human Liver Microsomal Fractions from Chinese Populations Related to CYP2C19 Gene Dose and Individual Ethnicity J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2000; 295(2): 844 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Emilien, M. Ponchon, C. Caldas, O. Isacson, and J.-M. Maloteaux Impact of genomics on drug discovery and clinical medicine QJM, July 1, 2000; 93(7): 391 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||