1 December 1998 | Volume 129 Issue 11 Part 2 | Pages 940-945
Background: A population-based hemochromatosis screening program that uses serum transferrin saturation has been proposed, but few data exist on the number of U.S. adults that such a program would identify for further testing.
Objective: To determine the prevalence of an initially elevated serum transferrin saturation and the prevalence of concurrently elevated serum transferrin saturation and serum ferritin levels in the adult population of the United States.
Design: Nationally representative cross-sectional survey of the noninstitutionalized U.S. civilian population.
Participants: 15 839 men and nonpregnant women 20 years of age and older who were examined in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994).
Measurements: Single measurements of serum transferrin saturations and serum ferritin levels. Cut-off values used to define elevated serum transferrin saturation ranged from greater than 45% to greater than 62%.
Results: The prevalence of initially elevated serum transferrin saturation ranged from 1% to 6%. Approximately 11% to 22% of those with elevated serum transferrin saturation had concurrently elevated serum ferritin levels. The prevalence of elevated serum transferrin saturation was lower in women than in men when the same cut-off value was used to define elevated serum transferrin saturation. The prevalence of elevated serum transferrin saturation in non-Hispanic black persons and Mexican-Americans was similar to or slightly less than that in non-Hispanic white persons. The prevalence of elevated serum transferrin saturation in persons 20 to 49 years of age was as high as or higher than that in older adults.
Conclusions: A hemochromatosis screening program that uses a cut-off value of greater than 60% to define elevated serum transferrin saturation would identify an estimated 1.4 to 2.5 million U.S. adults for further testing.
The National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducted NHANES III to assess the health and nutritional status of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population of the United States [15]. Details of the survey's design, sample, and operation have been published elsewhere [15]. A single phlebotomy was performed on the nationally representative sample examined in the survey at any time between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. Persons who were scheduled for examination between 8 a.m. and noon were asked to fast for 12 hours, and persons who were scheduled for examination after noon were asked to fast for 6 hours.
We limited our study sample to the 15 839 men and nonpregnant women 20 years of age and older for whom data on serum transferrin saturation was available, regardless of time of blood collection or length of fast. Not all persons selected for inclusion in the NHANES III sample agreed to be interviewed or examined. Thus, our study sample comprises 68% of the nonpregnant adults who were originally selected for NHANES III, 84% of those who were interviewed, and 96% of those who had physical examinations. The NHANES III study was approved by the institutional review board of the National Center for Health Statistics. All respondents provided written informed consent [15].
Variables
The biochemical variables used in our study were serum iron level, total iron-binding capacity, serum ferritin level, and C-reactive protein level [16, 17]. Serum transferrin saturation was calculated by dividing serum iron level by total iron-binding capacity. Assays for serum iron level, total iron-binding capacity, and serum ferritin level were performed by the Division of Environmental Health Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC (Atlanta, Georgia). Serum iron levels and total iron-binding capacity were measured colorimetrically by using an Alpkem RFA analyzer (Alpkem, Clackamas, Oregon); a 1% thiourea solution was added to complex Cu++ to prevent copper interference [16]. Serum ferritin levels were measured by using the Quantimmume IRMA kit (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, California).
Respondents were given the results of their serum ferritin tests, and they received a special alert if their serum ferritin levels exceeded 2000 µg/L. Because no widely accepted criteria for elevated serum transferrin saturation existed at the time of NHANES III, respondents were not given the results of tests for this variable. C-reactive protein levels, which reflect the presence or absence of inflammation, were measured at the Immunology Division of the University of Washington (Seattle, Washington) with latex-enhanced nephelometry.
The technician who performed each phlebotomy recorded the time of blood collection. Length of fast was the respondent-reported time since food or liquid, except water, had last been consumed. Ethnicity was also reported by the respondent, and ethnic categories were based on U.S. Bureau of the Census definitions. We limited comparisons of ethnic groups to non-Hispanic white persons (n = 6752), non-Hispanic black persons (n = 4227), and Mexican-Americans (n = 4233) because there were too few persons in other ethnic groups to allow us to report data separately for those groups.
Definition of Elevated Serum Transferrin Saturation and Elevated Serum Ferritin Level
Elevated serum transferrin saturation was defined as greater than 45%, greater than 50%, greater than 55%, greater than 60%, or greater than 62%; all of these cut-off values had previously been proposed or used in population-based studies of elevated serum transferrin saturation [1-3, 7-14]. We defined elevated serum ferritin levels as greater than 400 µg/L for men, greater than 200 µg/L for women 20 to 49 years of age, and greater than 300 µg/L for women 50 years of age and older [2, 18]. To limit the number of analyses when we compared prevalences of elevated serum transferrin saturation according to ethnicity or age, we used cut-off values of greater than 60% for men and greater than 55% for women rather than applying the full range of values. We chose these values because they had previously been used in a study of elevated serum transferrin saturation done by the CDC [19].
Data Analysis
We used sampling weights to calculate prevalence estimates; these weights account for oversampling and nonresponse to the household interview and physical examination but not for nonparticipation in phlebotomy or for missing data on serum transferrin saturation. The sampling weights were based on the March 1990 and March 1993 Current Population Survey, adjusted for undercounts, for the civilian noninstitutionalized U.S. population [20]. We performed all analyses with SUDAAN [21], a family of statistical procedures for analysis of data from complex sample surveys. To estimate the total number of persons in the United States with elevated serum transferrin saturation, we multiplied the prevalences found in our study with the appropriate census count for the noninstitutionalized U.S. civilian population 20 years of age and older at the midpoint of the survey. In our results, we note estimates that do not meet the criteria for statistical reliability on the basis of sample size (which ranged from 39 to 872 persons, depending on the estimate) and relative SE (SE/prevalence, <30%) [22]. These estimates are presented here because of the importance of hemochromatosis to the public health, even though NHANES III was not designed to reliably estimate the prevalences of rare conditions (conditions that occur in <10% of the population) [23].
In preliminary analyses, we found that time of blood collection, length of fast, and C-reactive protein level differed significantly by ethnicity and age. Diurnal variation, fasting, and inflammation are known to affect serum transferrin saturation independently of iron status [24-27]. Thus, we compared the prevalence of elevated serum transferrin saturation by ethnicity and age in both the total study sample and in a subsample of participants who had blood drawn before noon, fasted for at least 12 hours, and had a C-reactive protein level less than 1 mg/dL [16]. POPULATION-BASED DATA
Prevalence of Elevated Serum Transferrin Saturation in Adults in the United States
Hereditary hemochromatosis is now recognized as a common genetic disease [1]. This recognition, along with the ability we now have to prevent the most severe outcomes of the disease if it is detected early [2, 3], has increased interest in screening for hemochromatosis. Population-based screening done by using serum transferrin saturation has been recommended by the College of American Pathologists [2]. Several studies [4-6] have indicated that such screening will be cost-effective, but the prevalence of elevated serum transferrin saturation-and, thus, the number of adults who would be identified for further testing-in the general U.S. population is not known. We therefore used data from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) to estimate the number of adults who would be identified for further testing in the first step of a screening program for hemochromatosis. Because various cut-off values to define elevated serum transferrin saturation have been used or proposed [1-3, 7-14], we used several different values. We also examined the prevalence of elevated serum transferrin saturation by respondent sex, ethnicity, and age. Finally, we calculated the percentage of adults who had concurrently elevated serum transferrin saturations and serum ferritin levels on a single occasions; this estimate is not based on a persistently elevated serum transferrin saturation but may approximate the prevalence of possible cases of hemochromatosis with some degree of hepatic iron overload.
Methods
![]()
Top
Methods
Results
Discussion
Author & Article Info
References
Data Source
Results
![]()
Top
Methods
Results
Discussion
Author & Article Info
References
The prevalence of elevated serum transferrin saturation ranged from approximately 1% to 6% in the total U.S. adult population (sexes combined), depending on the cut-off value used to define elevated serum transferrin saturation (Table 1). When the same value was used to define elevated serum transferrin saturation for men and women, the prevalence of elevated serum transferrin saturation was 1.3 to 1.8 times greater in men than in women.
|
The prevalence of elevated serum transferrin saturation was similar in non-Hispanic black men and non-Hispanic white men, but it was lower in non-Hispanic black women than in non-Hispanic white women (Figure 1). The prevalence of elevated serum transferrin saturation was not statistically significantly different in Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic white persons for either sex. Results for non-Hispanic black women must be interpreted with caution because prevalence estimates for this group did not meet the criteria for statistical reliability. For both men and women, the prevalence of elevated serum transferrin saturation in adults younger than 50 years of age was as great as or greater than it was in the two older age groups (Figure 2). However, because estimates for several groups did not meet the criteria for statistical reliability, these findings must be interpreted with caution.
|
|
When we restricted our sample to persons who had phlebotomy in the morning, fasted for at least 12 hours, and had normal C-reactive protein levels, we found the same prevalence pattern by age (data not shown). The pattern of age-adjusted prevalence by ethnicity was also similar in the total and restricted samples, except that in the restricted sample, prevalence was slightly lower in non-Hispanic black men than in non-Hispanic white men (data not shown).
Among adults who had elevated serum transferrin saturation as defined by various cut-off values, approximately 11% to 22% had a concurrently elevated serum ferritin level (Table 2). Thus, the prevalence of concurrently elevated serum transferrin saturation and serum ferritin level in the total population is approximately 0.2% to 0.7% (data not shown). The greater the cut-off value for elevated serum transferrin saturation, the greater the prevalence of concurrently elevated serum ferritin levels.
|
Among persons with an elevated serum transferrin saturation, a higher proportion of women than of men also had an elevated serum ferritin level. This may be due in part to the lower cut-off values used to define an elevated serum ferritin level in women.
Discussion
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is important to emphasize that our results indicate only the prevalence of initially elevated serum transferrin saturation that would be expected if a screening program for hemochromatosis were implemented. Blood was drawn only once from each respondent in the representative sample in NHANES III; thus, it was not possible to determine the prevalence of persistently elevated serum transferrin saturation in the population. Only some of those persons with an elevated serum transferrin saturation on one occasion would have an elevated value on a second occasion. The percentage of persons with an initial single elevated serum transferrin saturation who have persistently elevated serum transferrin saturation is not well defined, but estimates range from 35% to 50% [1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14]. Thus, although our results provide vital information needed to estimate the probable outcome of a screening program, they cannot alone justify implementation of such a program. As Cogswell and colleagues note [28], much remains to be learned about the natural history of hemochromatosis and iron overload. Furthermore, many other issues, ranging from ethical and legal considerations to laboratory standardization, must also be considered in the decision about whether to implement a screening program [28].
The lack of a second measure of serum transferrin saturation in NHANES III prevented us from precisely estimating the prevalence of persistently elevated serum transferrin saturation coupled with an elevated serum ferritin level; the College of American Pathologists screening guidelines [2] recommend liver biopsy for persons with both of these conditions. However, we found that 11% to 22% of those with an initially elevated serum transferrin saturation (0.2% to 0.7% of the total population) had a concurrently elevated serum ferritin level. This may approximate the percentage of persons who would be considered for liver biopsy according to this screening algorithm.
We found similar or only slightly different prevalences of initially elevated serum transferrin saturation in the various age and ethnic groups. The significance of this finding is uncertain because we do not know whether the proportion of those with an initially elevated serum transferrin saturation who ultimately receive a diagnosis of hemochromatosis differs by age or ethnicity. The prevalence of both classic, HLA-linked hemochromatosis and HFE mutations seems to be less common in nonwhite persons [2, 29, 30]. However, a primary iron overload syndrome that differs from classic hereditary hemochromatosis in clinical symptoms, iron deposition site in the liver, and linkage with the HLA gene has been described in African-Americans [31, 32]. Serum transferrin saturation in African-Americans who had received a diagnosis of iron overload was lower than that typically associated with hereditary hemochromatosis [31]; this suggests that a lower cut-off value for elevated serum transferrin saturation might be more appropriate for screening in black persons. More information (including an evaluation of serum transferrin saturation as a screening tool) is needed about hemochromatosis and primary iron overload syndromes in nonwhite persons.
Limitations of our study include the variability introduced by collection of blood at different times of day, variable fasting times, and possible confounding of serum transferrin saturation and serum ferritin levels by the presence of infection or other inflammatory conditions. Serum iron levels, and hence serum transferrin saturations, are subject to diurnal variation: They are highest in the morning, intermediate in the afternoon, and lowest in the evening [17, 24, 25]. Some authors have reported that patients with hemochromatosis have elevated serum transferrin saturations throughout the day [33], but diurnal variation may still affect the cost of a screening program if it increases the number of persons without hemochromatosis who are inappropriately identified for follow-up testing. Serum iron levels increase after consumption of iron [26], and fasting reduces within-person variability in serum iron levels [34]. Finally, confounding resulting from inflammation may have affected overall prevalence rates because serum transferrin saturation is depressed and serum ferritin levels are elevated in both acute and chronic inflammatory conditions [27, 35, 36]. However, we found that patterns of elevated serum transferrin saturation by age and ethnicity were similar in the complete study sample and in the subsample that was created to minimize confounding from fasting, diurnal variation, and inflammation. This suggests, but cannot firmly establish, that the effect of these potential biases was small. In addition, because a population-wide screening program would probably be conducted under circumstances similar to those used in NHANES III, the estimates that were not adjusted for these factors are probably the most relevant to anticipation of the outcome of a population screening program.
Another possible limitation of our study is non-response bias. We did not obtain usable data on serum transferrin saturation for approximately 32% of the originally selected study sample. Nonresponse bias in the NHANES III sample was reduced by an adjustment factor included in the calculation of the sample weights [37]. This adjustment does not address nonresponse among the 4% of examined adults for whom data on serum transferrin saturation were missing, but this small proportion is unlikely to have introduced serious bias. In addition, a previous nonresponse study found that adult respondents and nonrespondents to various parts of the survey did not seem to differ substantially in characteristics relevant to iron status [38]. Thus, our estimates are unlikely to be seriously biased by non-response. Of note, our estimates apply only to non-institutionalized adult populations because institutionalized persons were excluded from the NHANES III sample by design.
By using various cut-off values for an elevated serum transferrin saturation, we have estimated the percentage of adults that would be targeted for further testing for hemochromatosis if the first step of a population-based screening program for this disease were implemented in the United States. With the cut-off value for elevated serum transferrin saturation recommended by the College of American Pathologists (60%) [2], the prevalence of elevated serum transferrin saturation in our study multiplied by the most recent census data [21] shows that approximately 1.4 to 2.5 million adults would be targeted for further testing. With cut-off values of greater than 60% for men and greater than 55% for women, approximately 1.8 to 3.8 million adults would receive further testing. In either case, the numbers are not trivial. Our results should be useful to those considering implementation of a population-wide hemochromatosis screening program that uses serum transferrin saturation.
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
References
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Bradley LA, Haddow JE, Palomaki GE. Population screening for haemochromatosis: a unifying analysis of published intervention trials J Med Screen. 1996;3:178-84.
2. Witte DL, Crosby WH, Edwards CQ, Fairbanks VF, Mitros FA. Practice guideline development task force of the College of American Pathologists. Hereditary hemochromatosis Clin Chim Acta. 1996;245:139-200.
3. Edwards CQ, Kushner JP. Screening for hemochromatosis N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1616-20.
4. Phatak PD, Guzman G, Woll JE, Robeson A, Phelps CE. Cost-effectiveness of screening for hereditary hemochromatosis Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:769-76.
5. Buffone GJ, Beck JR. Cost-effectiveness analysis for evaluation of screening programs: hereditary hemochromatosis Clin Chem. 1994;40:1631-6.
6. Balan V, Baldus W, Fairbanks V, Michels V, Burritt M, Klee G. Screening for hemochromatosis: a cost-effectiveness study based on 12,258 patients Gastroenterology. 1994;107:453-9.
7. Leggett BA, Halliday JW, Brown NN, Bryant S, Powell LW. Prevalence of haemochromatosis amongst asymptomatic Australians Br J Haematol. 1990;74:525-30.
8. Jonsson JJ, Johannesson GM, Sigfusson N, Magnusson B, Thjodleifsson B, Magnusson S. Prevalence of iron deficiency and iron overload in the adult Icelandic population J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1289-97.
9. Baer DM, Simons JL, Staples RL, Rumore GJ, Morton CJ. Hemochromatosis screening in asymptomatic ambulatory men 30 years of age and older Am J Med. 1995;98:464-8.
10. Karlsson M, Ikkala E, Reunanen A, Takkunen H, Vuori E, Makinen J. Prevalence of hemochromatosis in Finland Acta Med Scand. 1988;224:385-90.
11. Elliott R, Lin BP, Dent OF, Tait A, Smith CI. Prevalence of hemochromatosis in a random sample of asymptomatic men Aust N Z J Med. 1986;16:491-5.
12. Lindmark B, Eriksson S. Regional differences in the idiopathic hemochromatosis gene frequency in Sweden Acta Med Scand. 1985;218:299-304.
13. Olsson KS, Eriksson K, Ritter B, Heedman PA. Screening for iron overload using transferrin saturation Acta Med Scand. 1984;215:105-12.
14. Edwards CQ, Griffen LM, Goldgar D, Drummond C, Skolnick MH, Kushner JP. Prevalence of hemochromatosis among 11,065 presumably healthy blood donors N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1355-62.
15. Plan and Operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-94. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics; 1994: DHHS publication no. (PHS) 94-1308. (Vital and Health Statistics; series 1; no. 32).
16. Gunter EW, Lewis BL, Koncikowski SM. Laboratory methods used for the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988-1994 [CD-ROM]. Hyattsville, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996. Available from National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.
17. Looker AC, Gunter EW, Johnson CL. Methods to assess iron status in various NHANES surveys Nutr Rev. 1995;53:246-54.
18. Custer EM, Finch CA, Sobel RE, Zettner A. Population norms for serum ferritin J Lab Clin Med. 1995;126:88-94.
19. Iron overload disorders among Hispanics-San. Diego, California, 1995 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996;45:991-3.
20. Mohadjer L, Montaquila J, Waksberg J, Bell B, James P, Flores-Cervantes I, et al. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Weighting and Estimation Methodology. Rockville, MD: WESTAT, Inc.; 1996.
21. Shah, BV, Barnwell BG, Hunt PN, LaVange LM. SUDAAN User's Manual. Release 5.50. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 1991.
22. Methodological Subcommittee on the HNIS/NCHS Analytic Working Group. Joint policy on variance estimation and statistical reporting standards on NHANES III and CSFII reports: HNIS/NCHS Analytic Working Group recommendations. In: Analytic and Reporting Guidelines, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988-94) Reference Manuals and Reports [CD-ROM]. Hyattsville, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996. Available from National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.
23. Ezzati TM, Massey JT, Waksberg J, Chu A, Maurer KR. Sample Design: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Hyattsville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics; 1992: DHHS publication no. 92-1387. (Vital and Health Statistics; series 2; no. 113).
24. Hamilton LD, Gubler CJ, Cartwright GE, Wintrobe MM. Diurnal variation in the plasma iron level of man Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1950;75:65-8.
25. Statland BE, Winkel P, Bokelund H. Variation of serum iron concentration in young healthy men: within-day and day-to-day changes Clin Biochem. 1976;9:26-9.
26. Crosby WH, O'Neil-Cutting MA. A small-dose iron tolerance test as an indicator of mild iron deficiency JAMA. 1984;251:1986-7.
27. Yip R, Dallman PR. The roles of inflammation and iron deficiency as causes of anemia Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;48:1295-300.
28. Cogswell ME, McDonnell SM, Khoury MJ, Franks AL, Burke W, Brittenham G. Iron overload, public health, and genetics: evaluating the evidence for hemochromatosis screening Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:971-9.
29. Merryweather-Clarke AT, Pointon JJ, Shearman JD, Robson KJ. Global prevalence of putative haemochromatosis mutations J Med Genet. 1997;34:275-8.
30. Monaghan KG, Rybicki BA, Shurafa M, Feldman GL. Mutation analysis of the HFE gene associated with hereditary hemochromatosis in African Americans Am J Hematol. 1998;58:213-7.
31. Barton JC, Edwards CQ, Bertoli LF, Shroyer TW, Hudson SL. Iron overload in African Americans Am J Med. 1995;99:616-23.
32. Wurapa RK, Gordeuk VR, Brittenham GM, Khiyami A, Schechter GP, Edwards CQ. Primary iron overload in African Americans Am J Med. 1996;101:9-18.
33. Edwards CQ, Griffen LM, Kaplan J, Kushner JP. Twenty-four hour variation of transferrin saturation in treated and untreated haemochromatosis homozygotes J Intern Med. 1989;226:373-9.
34. Lammi-Keefe CJ, Lickteig ES, Ahluwalia N, Haley NR. Day-to-day variation in iron status indexes is similar for most measures in elderly women with and without rheumatoid arthritis J Am Diet Assoc. 1996;96:247-51.
35. Witte DL. Can serum ferritin be effectively interpreted in the presence of the acute-phase response? [Editorial] Clin Chem. 1991;37:484-5.
36. Hulthen L, Lindstedt G, Lundberg PA, Hallberg L. Effect of a mild infection on serum ferritin concentration-clinical and epidemiological implications Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998;52:376-9.
37. Ezzati T, Khare M. Nonresponse adjustments in a national health survey. In: 1992 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Assoc; 1992:339-44.
38. Mohadjer L, Bell B, Waksberg J. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Accounting for Item Nonresponse Bias. Rockville, MD: WESTAT, Inc.; 1996.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M Bhavnani, D Lloyd, J Marples, K Pendry, and M Worwood Targeted screening for genetic haemochromatosis: a combined phenotype/genotype approach. J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2006; 59(5): 501 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Qaseem, M. Aronson, N. Fitterman, V. Snow, K. B. Weiss, D. K. Owens, and for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee Screening for Hereditary Hemochromatosis: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, October 4, 2005; 143(7): 517 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Schmitt, R. M. Golub, and R. Green Screening Primary Care Patients for Hereditary Hemochromatosis with Transferrin Saturation and Serum Ferritin Level: Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, October 4, 2005; 143(7): 522 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Mainous III, J. M. Gill, and C. J. Everett Transferrin Saturation, Dietary Iron Intake, and Risk of Cancer Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2005; 3(2): 131 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Mainous III, J. M. Gill, and P. J. Carek Elevated Serum Transferrin Saturation and Mortality Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2004; 2(2): 133 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Mainous III, B. Wells, P. J. Carek, J. M. Gill, and M. E. Geesey The Mortality Risk of Elevated Serum Transferrin Saturation and Consumption of Dietary Iron Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2004; 2(2): 139 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. McDonnell and R. G. Parrish Hereditary Hemochromatosis and Its Elusive Natural History Arch Intern Med, November 10, 2003; 163(20): 2421 - 2423. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Mainous III, J. M. Gill, and W. S. Pearson Should We Screen for Hemochromatosis?: An Examination of Evidence of Downstream Effects on Morbidity and Mortality Arch Intern Med, August 12, 2002; 162(15): 1769 - 1774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. McLaren, K.-T. Li, V. R. Gordeuk, V. Hasselblad, and G. D. McLaren Relationship between transferrin saturation and iron stores in the African American and US Caucasian populations: analysis of data from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Blood, October 15, 2001; 98(8): 2345 - 2351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Steinberg, M. E. Cogswell, J. C. Chang, S. P. Caudill, G. M. McQuillan, B. A. Bowman, L. M. Grummer-Strawn, E. J. Sampson, M. J. Khoury, and M. L. Gallagher Prevalence of C282Y and H63D Mutations in the Hemochromatosis (HFE) Gene in the United States JAMA, May 2, 2001; 285(17): 2216 - 2222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Iron Overload and Public Health Journal Watch (General), December 22, 1998; 1998(1222): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Phatak, R. L. Sham, R. F. Raubertas, K. Dunnigan, M. T. O'Leary, C. Braggins, and J. D. Cappuccio Prevalence of Hereditary Hemochromatosis in 16 031 Primary Care Patients Ann Intern Med, December 1, 1998; 129(11_Part_2): 954 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. McDonnell, P. D. Phatak, V. Felitti, A. Hover, and G. D. McLaren Screening for Hemochromatosis in Primary Care Settings Ann Intern Med, December 1, 1998; 129(11_Part_2): 962 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Cogswell, S. M. McDonnell, M. J. Khoury, A. L. Franks, W. Burke, and G. Brittenham Iron Overload, Public Health, and Genetics: Evaluating the Evidence for Hemochromatosis Screening Ann Intern Med, December 1, 1998; 129(11_Part_2): 971 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Wetterhall, M. E. Cogswell, and K. V. Kowdley Public Health Surveillance for Hereditary Hemochromatosis Ann Intern Med, December 1, 1998; 129(11_Part_2): 980 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||