Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Blank, R. D.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Numeracy

right arrow Robert D. Blank, MD, PhD

1 May 1998 | Volume 128 Issue 9 | Page 783


TO THE EDITOR:

In their recent article, Schwartz and colleagues [1] raise the important issue of whether patients have sufficient quantitative reasoning ability to understand risk–benefit information about mammography. They show that women's ability to gauge their risks for breast cancer and potential benefit from mammography correlates with greater numeracy, as measured by a three-item questionnaire. It is hard to overstate the importance of this finding because it has profound implications for clinical practice and for our understanding of informed consent in this and other settings. The authors' findings lead naturally to another, even more disturbing question: How "numerate" are physicians? Just as patients may be unable to assess quantitative information, physicians may not be able to present information clearly and accurately. Has this been investigated? Are there measured differences between the numerical skills of internists, family practitioners, and gynecologists? If we as a population are failing to effectively present quantitative information to our patients, then it is imperative that we recognize and remedy that failure.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

The Hospital for Special Surgery; New York, NY 10021


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, Welch HG. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127:966-72.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Blank, R. D.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online