| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 April 1998 | Volume 128 Issue 8 | Page 698
Through the telling of stories, I have had the good fortune to visit more than 40 training programs. Prompted by questions from housestaff at earlier visits, I began to hold private sessions at later visits with housestaff only-faculty excluded-sessions I called "Forbidden Topics," where nothing discussed leaves the room. We talk about money medical malpractice, and medical marriages.
Soon, they tell me what they cannot tell their faculty: of the absolute lack of mentoring, the dearth of role models, the paucity of wise counsel. Reluctantly, they admit to an attitude of patient as onus. They learn that attitude from each other, they tell me, and from their immediate superiors. Faculty are seldom around these days, after all, forced as they are to forgo teaching to earn money for the institution.
I hear, too, of sexual harassment from their superiors, of how many young women and some men are victims of it and horrified by it, but how a few learn to exploit it to get a leg up on the rest, as did Cass in the story. I come away from these sessions feeling as you do. Dr. Sirridge, that this is not a description of medicine as the caring profession I have known either. And that these young people are being cheated.
Cass's story, while wholly fiction, is nevertheless of reality. It is, I agree, offensive. Reality sometimes is. If there is to be change, it will be up to you and your colleagues, Dr. Sirridge. But it will not be through denial. Nor do I have any easy answers for a medical faculty under siege itself. But you could start with the examples of Fitzgerald at UC Davis, Rubenstein at Chicago, Kreisberg at Birmingham, and Khan at Nassau County. They seem to know how to nurture their housestaffs.
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
REPLY
Medicine: A Caring Profession?
IN RESPONSE:
Author and Article Information
![]()
Top
Author & Article Info
Bridgton, ME 04009
![]()
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. B. Weeks and A. E. Wallace Time and Money: A Retrospective Evaluation of the Inputs, Outputs, Efficiency, and Incomes of Physicians Arch Intern Med, April 28, 2003; 163(8): 944 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Yank and D Barnes Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: cross-sectional survey of editors and authors J. Med. Ethics, April 1, 2003; 29(2): 109 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||