Article
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Google Scholar
|
|
|
PubMed
|
|
|
|
LETTER
Botulinum Toxin in Long-Term Therapy for Achalasia
Vito Annese, MD;
Vittorio D'Onofrio, MD; and
Angelo Andriulli, MD
15 April 1998 | Volume 128 Issue 8 | Page 696
TO THE EDITOR:
Surgical myotomy and pneumatic dilatation, the standard treatment for esophageal achalasia, carry a significant risk for major complications, notably gastroesophageal reflux and perforation [1, 2]. Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin has been reported as a safe and effective novel short-term treatment [3]. The results were similar to those seen with dilatation [4]; moreover, the toxin was also effective in patients in whom myotomy or dilatation was unsuccessful [5].
We prospectively investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of endoscopic injection of 100 U of Botox (Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California) into the lower esophageal sphincter in 54 consecutive patients. Response was assessed on the basis of symptoms (frequency of dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain, scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 3), esophageal manometry, and esophageal radionuclide emptying.
One month after treatment, 47 patients (87%) were responders (symptom score
2). The alleviation of symptoms was paralleled by reductions in lower esophageal sphincter pressure (mean ±SD, 21 ± 9 mm Hg compared with 33 ± 11 mm Hg in nonresponders; P < 0.002) and esophageal retention (27% ± 17% compared with 50% ± 22%; P < 0.001) (Figure 1). After a mean follow-up of 16 ± 9 months (range, 5 to 39 months), 40 patients (74%) were still in remission, although 16 and 9 patients had been injected two and three times, respectively, when symptoms recurred. The Kaplan-Meier probability of remission at 3 years was 70%. The efficacy of the first and second injection lasted for 7.3 ± 5 and 10.2 ± 6.3 months, respectively. Neither serious adverse events nor symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were reported. Responders were older (53 ± 19 years compared with 40 ± 18 years; P < 0.04) and less symptomatic (symptom score, 5.4 ± 1.3 compared with 6.5 ± 1.1; P < 0.008) than nonresponders. Pretreatment esophageal function tests, however, did not predict outcome.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Modifications in symptom score, basal left esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, and percentage of esophageal retention 1 month after the first injection of botulinum toxin.
|
|
Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin is effective and safe for the long-term treatment of achalasia. Two thirds of patients have a sustained response if therapy is repeated when symptoms relapse. Failures occurred more frequently within the first months, in younger patients, and in patients with a long duration of dysphagia and higher symptom scores.
|
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital; San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
1. Richter JE. Motility disorders of the esophagus. In: Yamada T, ed. Textbook of Gastroenterology. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1995:1174-213.
2. Vantrappen G. Being toxic to the esophagus. Gut. 1997; 41:131-2.
3. Pasricha PJ, Ravich WJ, Hendrix TR, Sostre S, Jones B, Kalloo AN. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of achalasia. N Engl J Med. 1995; 322:774-8.
4. Annese V, Basciani M, Perri F, Lombardi G, Frusciante V, Simone P, et al. Controlled trial of botulinum toxin injection versus placebo and pneumatic dilation in achalasia. Gastroenterology. 1996; 111:1418-24.
5. Annese V, Basciani M, Lombardi G, Caruso N, Perri F, Simone P, et al. Perendoscopic injection of botulinum toxin is effective in achalasia after failure of myotomy or pneumatic dilation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996; 44:461-5.
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
Article
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Google Scholar
|
|
|
PubMed
|
|
|
|