REPLY
Ultrasonographic Screening for Deep Venous Thrombosis after Arthroplasty
David R. Anderson, MD;
K. Sue Robinson, MD; and
Michael Gross, MD
1 April 1998 | Volume 128 Issue 7 | Page 601
IN RESPONSE:
As Dr. Pedell points out, the mean length of stay after total hip or knee arthroplasty has decreased since we completed our study. Our study showed that an average of 10 days of warfarin prophylaxis given in the hospital only provided safe and effective patient care. With current lengths of hospital stay after joint arthroplasty as short as 4 days, the question is raised about whether outpatient warfarin treatment is warranted to ensure that patients receive prophylaxis for at least 10 days.
Our study does shed some light on this matter. We agree with Dr. Pedell that the state of mobilization at the time of hospital discharge is likely to be a factor in the risk for the development of postdischarge venous thromboembolism. At hospital discharge, 85% of the patients in our study were "fully mobile," and no correlation was observed between length of stay and risk for subsequent postdischarge venous thromboembolism. About 15% of the patients were discharged from the hospital before day 6. On the basis of this information, we believe that patients who receive prophylaxis for 5 days and are fully mobile at hospital discharge on day 5 do not require postdischarge prophylaxis. Postdischarge prophylaxis lasting up to 5 days should be considered for patients discharged on day 5 who are not fully mobile.
As stated by Dr. Rajput and Mr. Nanavati, controlled studies have shown that prolonging prophylaxis 3 weeks beyond hospital discharge reduces the rate of venography-confirmed deep venous thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty [1, 2]. However, it is uncertain whether prolonging prophylaxis for this length of time results in a clinically important reduction in the rate of symptomatic or fatal thromboembolic complications after total hip or knee arthroplasty. In the absence of outcomes data from controlled trials, the potential benefits of outpatient prophylaxis must be carefully weighed against the risks and the costs of medication and monitoring in any individual patient.
|
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
1. Planes A, Vochelle N, Darmon JY, Fagola M, Bellaud M, Huet Y. Risk of deep-venous thrombosis after hospital discharge in patients having undergone total hip replacement: double-blind randomised comparison of enoxparain versus placebo. Lancet. 1996; 348:224-8.
2. Bergqvist D, Benoni G, Bjorgell O, Fredin H, Hedlundh U, Nicolas S, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335:696-700.
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.