Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Delanty, N.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

The Language of Case Histories

right arrow Norman Delanty, MD

15 May 1998 | Volume 128 Issue 10 | Page 877


TO THE EDITOR:

I read with interest and pleasure Dr. Donnelly's essay [1], and I agree with most of its sentiments. My complaint about language in case history presentation is more specific. I am a graduate of an Irish medical school who has been in the United States for the past 3 and a half years. Since coming here, I have found the use of the term "status post" in referring to aspects of the patient's history (recent or remote) to be appalling, both linguistically and humanely. "The patient had bypass surgery" is much gentler to my ear than "the patient is status post CABG." More important, I think that this ugly phrase is mechanistic and even degrading. Am I alone? Could I even dare suggest that we become status post "status post" and drop this abomination from our medical histories and case presentations?


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA 19104


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Donnelly WJ. The language of medical case histories. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127:1045-8.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Delanty, N.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online